The opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations of this article are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army.
Assessing peri-implant tissue infection prevention in a percutaneous model†
Article first published online: 19 NOV 2009
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31528
Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Volume 92B, Issue 2, pages 397–408, February 2010
Additional Information
How to Cite
Perry, E. L., Beck, J. P., Williams, D. L. and Bloebaum, R. D. (2010), Assessing peri-implant tissue infection prevention in a percutaneous model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 92B: 397–408. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31528
- †
Publication History
- Issue published online: 6 JAN 2010
- Article first published online: 19 NOV 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 19 AUG 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 14 AUG 2009
- Manuscript Received: 2 DEC 2008
Funded by
- Department of Defense TATRC Award. Grant Number: W81XWH-05-1-0628
- Office of Research and Development
- Rehabilitation R&D Service
- George E. Wahlen DVA SLC Health Care System
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- osseointegration;
- percutaneous;
- infection;
- antimicrobial;
- Ceragenins™
Abstract
Background: Infection remains the main challenge to percutaneous, intramedullary osseointegrated implant technology. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if a broad spectrum antimicrobial, Ceragenin™ (CSA-13) could prevent pin track infections in a percutaneous tibial pin site in a sheep model. Methods: In 20 sheep, a smooth titanium alloy pin/implant was inserted percutaneously through the medial skin and both cortices of the proximal tibia. In 10 sheep, the pin/skin interface was treated with a CSA-13-embedded foam pad. Ten sheep served as controls receiving an untreated pad. At the end of 24 weeks, or if they presented with clinical signs of infection, the animals were euthanized. Histological stains were processed from soft tissue and bone, and bacterial cultures were taken from tissue, bone, and blood. In addition to clinical signs, sheep were considered infected if at least one tissue culture and/or histologically stained sample was positive. Results: Compared with the controls, CSA-13 did not prevent pin track infection (p = 0.88). Large gaps around the pin indicated a lack of skin-pin adhesion. Conclusions: In this application, CSA-13 was not effective in preventing pin track infections. This study suggests that maintaining skin attachment, at the implant surface of osseointegrated implants, is essential as a primary barrier to infection. Local antimicrobial treatments should be considered a secondary barrier to bacterial invasion of the pin/skin interface and deeper tissues. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010

1552-4981/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=5379427095157799a12abb49232afce4b0bfd067)
1552-4981/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=3b172f0bcfe0aecb9beba7fe07bb4506053aca55)