• 1
    Miller PD. Clinical use of bone mass measurements in adults for the assessment and management of osteoporosis. In: FavusMJ, ed. Primer on the Metabolic Bone Disease and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 150161. 2006.
  • 2
    Guo XE, Liu XS, Wehrli FW. Advanced structural assessment of bone using CT and MRI. In: OrwollE, BilezikianJP, VanderschuerenD, eds. Osteoporosis in Men 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 547564. 2009.
  • 3
    Kazakia GJ, Majumdar S. New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006; 7: 6774.
  • 4
    Boutroy S, Bouxsein ML, Munoz F, Delmas PD. In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90: 65086515.
  • 5
    Laib A, Hauselmann HJ, Ruegsegger P. In vivo high resolution 3D-QCT of the human forearm. Technol Health Care. 1998; 6: 329337.
  • 6
    Boutroy S, van Rietbergen B, Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Bouxsein ML, Delmas PD. Finite Element Analyses Based on In Vivo HR-pQCT Images of the Distal Radius is Associated with Wrist Fracture in Postmenopausal Women. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 23: 392399.
  • 7
    Cohen A, Dempster DW, Muller R, et al. Assessment of trabecular and cortical architecture and mechanical competence of bone by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography: comparison with transiliac bone biopsy. Osteoporos Int. 2010; 21: 263273.
  • 8
    Cohen A, Liu XS, McMahon DJ, et al. Bone Microarchitecture and Stiffness in Premenopausal Women With Idiopathic Osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94: 43514360.
  • 9
    Liu XS, Cohen A, Shane E, et al. Individual Trabeculae Segmentation (ITS)-Based Morphological Analyses of High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Images Detect Abnormal Trabecular Plate and Rod Microarchitecture in Premenopausal Women with Idiopathic Osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25: 14961505.
  • 10
    Melton LJ 3rd, Riggs BL, van Lenthe GH, et al. Contribution of in vivo structural measurements and load/strength ratios to the determination of forearm fracture risk in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22: 14421448.
  • 11
    Sornay-Rendu E, Boutroy S, Munoz F, Delmas PD. Alterations of cortical and trabecular architecture are associated with fractures in postmenopausal women, partially independent of decreased BMD measured by DXA: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22: 425433.
  • 12
    Vico L, Zouch M, Amirouche A, et al. High-resolution pQCT analysis at the distal radius and tibia discriminates patients with recent wrist and femoral neck fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 23: 17411750.
  • 13
    Walker MD, McMahon DJ, Udesky J, Liu G, Bilezikian JP. Application of high resolution skeletal imaging to measurements of volumetric bone density and skeletal microarchitecture in Chinese American and Caucasian women: explanation of a paradox. J Bone Miner Res. 2009; 24: 19531959.
  • 14
    Lang TF, Guglielmi G, van Kuijk C, De Serio A, Cammisa M, Genant HK. Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures. Bone. 2002; 30: 247250.
  • 15
    Lang TF, Li J, Harris ST, Genant HK. Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999; 23: 130137.
  • 16
    Bauer JS, Muller D, Ambekar A, et al. Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17: 608615.
  • 17
    Gupta R, Cheung AC, Bartling SH, et al. Flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics. 2008; 28: 20092022.
  • 18
    Ito M, Ikeda K, Nishiguchi M, et al. Multi-detector row CT imaging of vertebral microstructure for evaluation of fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res. 2005; 20: 18281836.
  • 19
    Kubota T, Yamada K, Ito H, Kizu O, Nishimura T. High-resolution imaging of the spine using multidetector-row computed tomography: differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 29: 712719.
  • 20
    Krug R, Banerjee S, Han ET, Newitt DC, Link TM, Majumdar S. Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16: 13071314.
  • 21
    Eckstein F, Matsuura M, Kuhn V, et al. Sex differences of human trabecular bone microstructure in aging are site-dependent. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22: 817824.
  • 22
    Ladinsky GA, Vasilic B, Popescu AM, et al. Trabecular structure quantified with the MRI-based virtual bone biopsy in postmenopausal women contributes to vertebral deformity burden independent of areal vertebral BMD. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 23: 6474.
  • 23
    Link TM, Bauer J, Kollstedt A, et al. Trabecular bone structure of the distal radius, the calcaneus, and the spine: which site predicts fracture status of the spine best? Invest Radiol. 2004; 39: 487497.
  • 24
    Majumdar S, Link TM, Augat P, et al. Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur. Magnetic Resonance Science Center and Osteoporosis and Arthritis Research Group. Osteoporos Int. 1999; 10: 231239.
  • 25
    Patel PV, Prevrhal S, Bauer JS, et al. Trabecular bone structure obtained from multislice spiral computed tomography of the calcaneus predicts osteoporotic vertebral deformities. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 29: 246253.
  • 26
    Sornay-Rendu E, Cabrera-Bravo JL, Boutroy S, Munoz F, Delmas PD. Severity of vertebral fractures is associated with alterations of cortical architecture in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2009; 24: 737743.
  • 27
    Wehrli FW, Gomberg BR, Saha PK, Song HK, Hwang SN, Snyder PJ. Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2001; 16: 15201531.
  • 28
    Liu XS, Zhang XH, Sekhon KK, et al. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography can assess microstructural and mechanical properties of human distal tibial bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25: 746756.
  • 29
    Macneil JA, Boyd SK. Accuracy of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality. Med Eng Phys. 2007; 29: 10961105.
  • 30
    Laib A, Hildebrand T, Hauselmann HJ, Ruegsegger P. Ridge number density: a new parameter for in vivo bone structure analysis. Bone. 1997; 21: 541546.
  • 31
    Laib A, Ruegsegger P. Calibration of trabecular bone structure measurements of in vivo three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography with 28-microm-resolution microcomputed tomography. Bone. 1999; 24: 3539.
  • 32
    Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P. A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microsc. 1997; 185: 6775.
  • 33
    Parfitt AM, Mathews CH, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin Invest. 1983; 72: 13961409.
  • 34
    Guo XE, Goldstein SA. Is trabecular bone tissue different from cortical bone tissue? Forma. 1997; 12: 185196.
  • 35
    Hollister SJ, Brennan JM, Kikuchi N. A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress. J Biomech. 1994; 27: 433444.
  • 36
    Lang T, LeBlanc A, Evans H, Lu Y, Genant H, Yu A. Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight. J Bone Miner Res. 2004; 19: 10061012.
  • 37
    Lang TF, Keyak JH, Heitz MW, et al. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. Bone. 1997; 21: 101108.
  • 38
    Crawford RP, Cann CE, Keaveny TM. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2003; 33: 744750.
  • 39
    Keyak JH, Kaneko TS, Tehranzadeh J, Skinner HB. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 219228.
  • 40
    Kopperdahl DL, Morgan EF, Keaveny TM. Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20: 801805.
  • 41
    Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: 1984.
  • 42
    MacNeil JA, Boyd SK. Load distribution and the predictive power of morphological indices in the distal radius and tibia by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2007; 41: 129137.
  • 43
    Sode M, Burghardt AJ, Kazakia GJ, Link TM, Majumdar S. Regional variations of gender-specific and age-related differences in trabecular bone structure of the distal radius and tibia. Bone. 2010; 25: 16521660.
  • 44
    Riggs BL, Melton LJ, Robb RA, et al. A population-based assessment of rates of bone loss at multiple skeletal sites: evidence for substantial trabecular bone loss in young adult women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2008; 23: 205214.
  • 45
    Boonen S, Cheng XG, Nijs J, et al. Factors associated with cortical and trabecular bone loss as quantified by peripheral computed tomography (pQCT) at the ultradistal radius in aging women. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997; 60: 164170.