SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Nelson DA, Barondess DA, Hendrix SL, Beck TJ. Cross-sectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(10):19927.
  • 2
    Nelson DA, Pettifor JM, Barondess DA, Cody DD, Uusi-Rasi K, Beck TJ. Comparison of cross-sectional geometry of the proximal femur in white and black women from Detroit and Johannesburg. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(4):5605.
  • 3
    Nelson D, Beck T, Wu G, Lewis C, Bassford T, Cauley J, Leboff M, Going S, Chen Z. Ethnic differences in femur geometry in the women's health initiative observational study. Osteoporos Int. 2010;22(5):137788.
  • 4
    Beck TJ, Petit MA, Wu G, LeBoff MS, Cauley JA, Chen Z. Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(8):136979.
  • 5
    Travison T, Beck T, Esche G, Araujo A, McKinlay J. Age trends in proximal femur geometry in men: variation by race and ethnicity. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(3):27787.
  • 6
    Zhang F, Tan LJ, Lei SF, Deng HW. The differences of femoral neck geometric parameters: effects of age, gender and race. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(7):120514.
  • 7
    Wang X-F, Duan Y, Beck TJ, Seeman E. Varying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age. Bone. 2005;36(6):97886.
  • 8
    Marshall LM. Race and ethnic variation in proximal femur structure and BMD among older men. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:12130.
  • 9
    Yan L, Crabtree NJ, Reeve J, Zhou B, Dequeker J, Nijs J, Falch JA, Prentice A. Does hip strength analysis explain the lower incidence of hip fracture in the People's Republic of China? Bone. 2004;34(3):5848.
  • 10
    Sowers MR, Greendale GA, Bondarenko I, Finkelstein JS, Cauley JA, Neer RM, Ettinger B. Endogenous hormones and bone turnover markers in pre- and perimenopausal women: SWAN. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14(3):1917.
  • 11
    Sternfeld B, Ainsworth BE, Quesenberry CP. Physical activity patterns in a diverse population of women. Prev Med. 1999;28(3):31323.
  • 12
    Baecke J, Burema J, Frijters J. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36(5):93642.
  • 13
    Huang MH, Schocken M, Block G, Sowers M, Gold E, Sternfeld B, Seeman T, Greendale GA. Variation in nutrient intakes by ethnicity: results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause. 2002;9(5):30919.
  • 14
    Finkelstein JS, Lee M-LT, Sowers M, Ettinger B, Neer RM, Kelsey JL, Cauley JA, Huang M-H, Greendale GA. Ethnic variation in bone density in premenopausal and early perimenopausal women: effects of anthropometric and lifestyle factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):305767.
  • 15
    Beck TJ, Looker AC, Ruff CB, Sievanen H, Wahner HW. Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(12):2297304.
  • 16
    Martin RB, Burr DB. Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry. J Biomech. 1984;17(3):195201.
  • 17
    Kaptoge S, Beck TJ, Reeve J, Stone KL, Hillier TA, Cauley JA, Cummings SR. Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(12):189204.
  • 18
    Mayhew PM, Thomas CD, Clement JG, Loveridge N, Beck TJ, Bonfield W, Burgoyne CJ, Reeve J. Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk. Lancet. 2005;366(9480):12935.
  • 19
    Young WC. Elastic stability formulas for stress and strain. In: Young WC, editor. Roark's formulas for stress and strain 6th edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; p. 688. 1989.
  • 20
    Rivadeneira F, Zillikens MC, De Laet CE, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, Beck TJ, Pols HA. Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(11):178190.
  • 21
    Chin K, Evans MC, Cornish J, Cundy T, Reid IR. Differences in hip axis and femoral neck length in premenopausal women of Polynesian, Asian and European origin. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(4):3447.
  • 22
    Nakamura T, Turner CH, Yoshikawa T, Slemenda CW, Peacock M, Burr DB, Mizuno Y, Orimo H, Ouchi Y, Johnston CC. Do variations in hip geometry explain differences in hip fracture risk between Japanese and white Americans?. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9(7):10716.
  • 23
    Lovejoy CO. Evolution of human walking. Sci Am. 1988;259:11825.
  • 24
    Verhulp E, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R. Load distribution in the healthy and osteoporotic human proximal femur during a fall to the side. Bone. 2008;42(1):305.
  • 25
    de Bakker PM, Manske SL, Ebacher V, Oxland TR, Cripton PA, Guy P. During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures. J Biomech. 2009;42(12):191725.
  • 26
    Johannesdottir F, Poole KES, Reeve J, Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Mogensen B, Jonsson BY, Sigurdsson S, Harris TB, Gudnason VG, Sigurdsson G. Distribution of cortical bone in the femoral neck and hip fracture: a prospective case-control analysis of 143 incident hip fractures; the AGES-REYKJAVIK Study. Bone. 2011;48(6):126876.
  • 27
    Im G, Lim M. Proximal hip geometry and hip fracture risk assessment in a Korean population. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(3):8037.
  • 28
    Cauley JA, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Arabi A, Fujiwara S, Ragi-Eis S, Calderon A, Chionh SB, Chen Z, Curtis JR, Danielson ME, Hanley DA, Kroger H, Kung AWC, Lesnyak O, Nieves J, Pluskiewicz W, ElRassi R, Silverman S, Schott A-M, Rizzoli R, Luckey M. Official positions for FRAX® clinical regarding international differences: from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX®. J Clin Densitometry. 2011;14(3):24062.
  • 29
    Cheng S, Levy A, Lefaivre K, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B. Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(10):257586.
  • 30
    Ishii S, Cauley J, Greendale G, Danielson M, Safaei Nili N, Karlamangla A. Ethnic differences in composite indices of femoral neck strength. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(4):138190.
  • 31
    Crabtree NJ, Kroger H, Martin A, Pols HAP, Lorenc R, Nijs J, Stepan JJ, Falch JA, Miazgowski T, Grazio S, Raptou P, Adams J, Collings A, Khaw KT, Rushton N, Lunt M, Dixon AK, Reeve J. Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture cases and controls. The EPOS Study. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(1):4854.
  • 32
    Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P, Jämsä T. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(4):27480.
  • 33
    Gnudi S, Sitta E, Fiumi N. Bone density and geometry in assessing hip fracture risk in post-menopausal women. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(959):8937.
  • 34
    Szulc P, Duboeuf F, Schott A, Dargent-Molina P, Meunier P, Delmas P. Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(2):2316.
  • 35
    Melton LJ, Beck TJ, Amin S, Khosla S, Achenbach SJ, Oberg AL, Riggs BL. Contributions of bone density and structure to fracture risk assessment in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(5):4607.
  • 36
    Lacroix AZ, Beck TJ, Cauley JA, Lewis CE, Bassford T, Jackson R, Wu G, Chen Z. Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density?. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(6):91929.
  • 37
    Beck T. Measuring the structural strength of bones with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: principles, technical limitations, and future possibilities. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14 (suppl 5): 818.