Therapists' adherence and competence and treatment discrimination in the NIDA Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study
Article first published online: 5 NOV 2003
Copyright © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Volume 60, Issue 1, pages 29–41, January 2004
How to Cite
Barber, J. P., Foltz, C., Crits-Christoph, P. and Chittams, J. (2004), Therapists' adherence and competence and treatment discrimination in the NIDA Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. J. Clin. Psychol., 60: 29–41. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10186
- Issue published online: 17 DEC 2003
- Article first published online: 5 NOV 2003
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Grant Number: R01-DA
- National Institute of Mental Health. Grant Numbers: P30-MH45178, MH 64610
The National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study was designed to assess the efficacy of four different psychosocial interventions (cognitive therapy, supportive–expressive dynamic therapy, and individual and group drug counseling) for cocaine dependence. This report addresses the treatment integrity and discriminability of the three individual treatments. Therapists' adherence and competence for all three individual treatments during early and late sessions were rated reliably by three sets of independent expert judges (one set of expert clinicians for each treatment condition). Results indicated that therapists and counselors made use of the therapeutic techniques described in their respective treatment manuals rather than those from different treatment manuals. Thus, treatments were easily discriminable by the independent judges. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.