Research Article
Voices of the five doctoral training councils in psychology: Seeking common ground on Combined-Integrated doctoral training in psychology
Article first published online: 21 JUL 2004
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20029
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue
1097-4679/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=43ac4db4a2f77657e5f46efdab08d3cfed771880)
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Special Issue: The Consensus Conference and Combined-Integrated Model of Doctoral Training in Professional Psychology (Part 1)
Volume 60, Issue 9, pages 957–967, September 2004
Additional Information
How to Cite
Blom-Hoffman, J., Okun, B. F., Lifter, K., Blashfield, R., Crowley, S. L., Goodyear, R. K., Strein, W. and Winfrey, L. L. (2004), Voices of the five doctoral training councils in psychology: Seeking common ground on Combined-Integrated doctoral training in psychology. J. Clin. Psychol., 60: 957–967. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20029
Publication History
- Issue published online: 11 AUG 2004
- Article first published online: 21 JUL 2004
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Doctoral training programs in psychology are accredited by the American Psychological Association in four areas: Clinical, Counseling, School, and Combined-Integrated (C-I) psychology. Each area of doctoral preparation in psychology has its own council, which represents its interests within the field and to external constituents. Despite the fact that Combined-Integrated training programs have existed since the mid-1970s, the Consortium representing this area's interests only formed in the past two years. The purpose of this article was to obtain input from representatives of all five training councils regarding the role of the newly formed council in relation to the other councils and the role of Combined-Integrated training. We begin with a brief description of each of the five councils. We then summarize the representatives' responses to narrative questions regarding advantages and disadvantages associated with meeting to discuss the combined model. Finally, common and divergent themes across the councils in training psychologists are presented, and the future role for Combined-Integrated programs is discussed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.

1097-4679/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=740195308d618b43d37c23cda286f91bc5dcc746)
1097-4679/asset/olbannercenter.png?v=1&s=d808ae238d537a609423cf18fad5b0d10ffa0da6)
1097-4679/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=3fd3c8dd747a40891967a805a9789c36411b0db3)