1097-4679/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=740195308d618b43d37c23cda286f91bc5dcc746)
1097-4679/asset/olbannercenter.png?v=1&s=d808ae238d537a609423cf18fad5b0d10ffa0da6)
1097-4679/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=3fd3c8dd747a40891967a805a9789c36411b0db3)
Research Article
Rooting the tree of knowledge: A response to Henriques' “Psychology Defined”
Article first published online: 6 OCT 2004
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20068
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue
1097-4679/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=43ac4db4a2f77657e5f46efdab08d3cfed771880 "Journal of Clinical Psychology")
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Special Issue: Defining Psychology: Articles and Commentaries on a New Unified Theory (Part 1)
Volume 60, Issue 12, pages 1255–1258, December 2004
Additional Information
How to Cite
Presbury, J. (2004), Rooting the tree of knowledge: A response to Henriques' “Psychology Defined”. J. Clin. Psychol., 60: 1255–1258. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20068
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 NOV 2004
- Article first published online: 6 OCT 2004
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Neither science nor culture could exist without a participant–observer and a conceiving human mind. Being-in-the-world, or “Dasein,” as Heidegger termed it, is fundamental to any conceptual understanding we have of how things work in the universe. There is no view from nowhere. Psychology is the primordial ground in which the tree of knowledge has its roots. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol.