Research Article
Cultivating mindfulness: effects on well-being
Article first published online: 16 MAY 2008
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20491
© 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Shapiro, S. L., Oman, D., Thoresen, C. E., Plante, T. G. and Flinders, T. (2008), Cultivating mindfulness: effects on well-being. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64: 840–862. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20491
Publication History
- Issue published online: 5 JUN 2008
- Article first published online: 16 MAY 2008
Funded by
- Metanexus Institute
- John Templeton Foundation
- Academic Council of Learned Societies
- Contemplative Mind in Society
- Fetzer Institute
- Santa Clara University
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- mindfulness;
- mediation;
- college mental health;
- meditation;
- attention
Abstract
There has been great interest in determining if mindfulness can be cultivated and if this cultivation leads to well-being. The current study offers preliminary evidence that at least one aspect of mindfulness, measured by the Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS; K. W. Brown & R. M. Ryan, 2003), can be cultivated and does mediate positive outcomes. Further, adherence to the practices taught during the meditation-based interventions predicted positive outcomes. College undergraduates were randomly allocated between training in two distinct meditation-based interventions, Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR; J. Kabat-Zinn, 1990; n=15) and E. Easwaran's (1978/1991) Eight Point Program (EPP; n=14), or a waitlist control (n=15). Pretest, posttest, and 8-week follow-up data were gathered on self-report outcome measures. Compared to controls, participants in both treatment groups (n=29) demonstrated increases in mindfulness at 8-week follow-up. Further, increases in mindfulness mediated reductions in perceived stress and rumination. These results suggest that distinct meditation-based practices can increase mindfulness as measured by the MAAS, which may partly mediate benefits. Implications and future directions are discussed. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 64: 1–23, 2008.

1097-4679/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=740195308d618b43d37c23cda286f91bc5dcc746)
1097-4679/asset/olbannercenter.png?v=1&s=d808ae238d537a609423cf18fad5b0d10ffa0da6)
1097-4679/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=3fd3c8dd747a40891967a805a9789c36411b0db3)
1097-4679/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=43ac4db4a2f77657e5f46efdab08d3cfed771880)