The authors are grateful to Dr. Roger Blashfield for his very helpful comments regarding the design of the study and the interpretation and presentation of the data. The World Health Organization Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse has received direct support that contributed to the conduct of this study from several sources: The International Union of Psychological Science, the National Institute of Mental Health (USA), the World Psychiatric Association, the Spanish Foundation of Psychiatry and Mental Health (Spain), and the Santander Bank UAM/UNAM endowed Chair for Psychiatry (Spain/Mexico). P. Sharan received a grant from Eli Lilly (India) unrelated to this project; J. Mari received speaking fees from Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, and Janssen unrelated to this project.
Mental Health Professionals’ Natural Taxonomies of Mental Disorders: Implications for the Clinical Utility of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5
Version of Record online: 7 OCT 2013
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Volume 69, Issue 12, pages 1191–1212, December 2013
How to Cite
Reed, G. M., Roberts, M. C., Keeley, J., Hooppell, C., Matsumoto, C., Sharan, P., Robles, R., Carvalho, H., Wu, C., Gureje, O., Leal-Leturia, I., Flanagan, E. H., Correia, J. M., Maruta, T., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., de Jesus Mari, J., Xiao, Z., Evans, S. C., Saxena, S. and Medina-Mora, M. E. (2013), Mental Health Professionals’ Natural Taxonomies of Mental Disorders: Implications for the Clinical Utility of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5. J. Clin. Psychol., 69: 1191–1212. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22031
Most of the authors of this article are members of the WHO International Advisory Group for the Revision of ICD-10 Mental and Behavioural Disorders and/or of Working Groups that report to the International Advisory Group. G. Reed and S. Saxena are members of the WHO Secretariat, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, WHO. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and, except as specifically noted, do not represent the official policies or positions of the International Advisory Group or of WHO. The WHO Research Ethics Review Committee as well as applicable local Institutional Review Boards reviewed and approved all procedures.
João Correia is now at the Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Issue online: 23 OCT 2013
- Version of Record online: 7 OCT 2013
Options for accessing this content:
- If you are a society or association member and require assistance with obtaining online access instructions please contact our Journal Customer Services team.
- If your institution does not currently subscribe to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
- Login via other institutional login options http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/login-options.
- You can purchase online access to this Article for a 24-hour period (price varies by title)
- If you already have a Wiley Online Library or Wiley InterScience user account: login above and proceed to purchase the article.
- New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.
Login via OpenAthens
Search for your institution's name below to login via Shibboleth.
Registered Users please login:
- Access your saved publications, articles and searches
- Manage your email alerts, orders and subscriptions
- Change your contact information, including your password
Please register to:
- Save publications, articles and searches
- Get email alerts
- Get all the benefits mentioned below!