This research was supported in part by grants from the Raskob Foundation to Vanderbilt University and from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to the University of Iowa's Prevention Research Center (grant number: U48/CCU720075). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funding organizations.
Community organizations and sense of community: further development in theory and measurement†
Article first published online: 10 JUL 2008
© 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Journal of Community Psychology
Volume 36, Issue 6, pages 798–813, August 2008
How to Cite
Peterson, N. A., Speer, P. W., Hughey, J., Armstead, T. L., Schneider, J. E. and Sheffer, M. A. (2008), Community organizations and sense of community: further development in theory and measurement. J. Community Psychol., 36: 798–813. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20260
- Issue published online: 18 JUL 2008
- Article first published online: 10 JUL 2008
The Community Organization Sense of Community Scale (COSOC) is a frequently used or cited measure of the construct in community psychology and other disciplines, despite a lack of confirmation of its underlying 4-factor framework. Two studies were conducted to test the hypothesized structure of the COSOC, the potential effects of method bias on psychometric properties, and whether a revised measure (COSOC-R) yielded improved model-to-data fit. Study 1 included year 2002 data from two samples: (a) randomly selected community residents (n=724) of five cities in the United States, and (b) randomly selected organizational members (n=508) of community-organizing initiatives in the same five US cities. Study 2 included year 2006 data from organizational members (n=151) of community-based prevention partnerships located in the midwestern United States. Results from both samples in Study 1 confirmed that method bias from the mixed use of positively and negatively worded items had a detrimental effect on the factor structure of the original COSOC. Results of Study 2 strongly supported the hypothesized 4-factor structure of the COSOC-R (i.e., relationship to organization, organization as mediator, influence of the organization, and bond to community). Study 2 results also showed that the overall COSOC-R and its subscales were reliable and related in expected ways with psychological empowerment, community participation, and organizational involvement. Implications of the study and strategies to further develop the COSOC are discussed. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.