SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. WATER
  4. OSMOTIC STRESS
  5. CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS
  6. OSMOTIC STRESS IN MAMMALS
  7. CONTRIBUTIONS TO OSMOTIC STRESS IN VIVO
  8. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
  9. LITERATURE CITED

The cellular response to osmotic stress ensures that the concentration of water inside the cell is maintained within a range that is compatible with biologic function. Single cell organisms are particularly dependent on mechanisms that permit adaptation to osmotic stress because each individual cell is directly exposed to the external environment. Mammals, however, limit osmotic stress by establishing an internal aqueous environment in which intravascular water and electrolytes are subject to sensitive and dynamic, organism-based homeostatic regulation. Recent studies of NFAT5/TonEBP, an essential mammalian osmoregulatory transcription factor, demonstrate the unexpected yet critical significance of cell-based osmotic regulation in vivo. These results highlight the fundamental importance of maintaining intracellular water homeostasis in the face of varying cellular metabolic activity and distinct tissue microenvironments. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Optimal cellular function and viability rely on mechanisms that allow the cell to adapt to changes in physical or biochemical conditions found in the extracellular environment (Hochachka and Somero, 2002). Reference to these mechanisms as “cellular stress responses” reflects the fact that macromolecules and biochemical processes function optimally under very specific biochemical conditions (e.g., temperature, concentration, ionic strength, etc.). Deviation from these optimal biochemical conditions results in suboptimal function and thus cellular stress. Cellular stress responses mitigate the detrimental effect that changes in environmental conditions can have on cell function by providing the means by which the cell can homeostatically re-establish optimal function under otherwise sub-optimal conditions. The fundamental importance of these pathways is illustrated by functional genomic studies showing that the expression of a significant percentage of all genes within the yeast genome is altered in response to changes in various extracellular conditions (Gasch et al., 2000; Causton et al., 2001). Moreover, proteins involved in cellular stress responses represent the most highly conserved among all organisms (Kultz, 2003).

The physical and biochemical parameters of greatest relevance to eukaryotic cell function include nutrient availability, oxygenation, temperature, pH, and osmolality. Unicellular eukaryotic organisms such as yeast, as they exist in nature, are very likely exposed to extremes of each of these environmental conditions. However, cells of higher eukaryotes that maintain a homeostatically regulated internal environment (i.e., mammals) are exposed to very limited changes in temperature and osmolality under normal physiologic conditions. In mammals, the regulation of intravascular fluid volume and plasma electrolyte concentrations by the kidney results in a homeostatic balance in which plasma osmolality does not normally vary by more than 2–3% (Guyton and Hall, 1996). However, the critical function of the kidney to reabsorb water and thus concentrate urine is dependent on the physiologic generation of an extremely hyperosmotic environment within the renal medulla (Knepper and Rector, 1996). Osmotic stress in mammals has thus been thought to be of particular and perhaps unique relevance to cells located in the medulla of the kidney, as there has been no direct experimental evidence supporting the biologic significance of osmotic stress and the osmotic stress response to cells outside the kidney.

In this review, a new perspective on osmotic stress in mammals is presented that is based on recent studies of the osmoregulatory transcription factor, NFAT5/TonEBP (hereafter referred to as NFAT5). The unanticipated importance of the mammalian osmotic stress response pathway defined by NFAT5 to the function of lymphocytes in vivo during an immune response not only demonstrates the biologic importance of the mammalian osmotic stress response outside the kidney, but further suggests that dependence on an osmotic stress response is a function of not only extracellular osmotic stress, but also cellular metabolic activity. These insights highlight the critical yet largely unappreciated importance of intracellular water homeostasis to normal cell function in vivo.

WATER

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. WATER
  4. OSMOTIC STRESS
  5. CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS
  6. OSMOTIC STRESS IN MAMMALS
  7. CONTRIBUTIONS TO OSMOTIC STRESS IN VIVO
  8. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
  9. LITERATURE CITED

Approximately 60% of body weight in man consists of water with two-thirds being present inside cells and most of the remaining water comprising the interstitial fluid outside cells that forms the extracellular environment (Guyton and Hall, 1996). Water has thus appropriately been referred to as the “universal solvent” of life because the myriad cellular biochemical processes that define biologic systems take place in the aqueous or water-soluble phase (Henderson, 1913; Hochachka and Somero, 2002). Consistent with this, thermodynamic and kinetic parameters typically used to describe biochemical reactions assume that the concentration of water, as a solvent, is in vast excess relative to the specific reactants and therefore has no effect on reaction equilibria and kinetics. However, distinct theoretical and experimental perspectives (Parsegian et al., 2000) indicate that the notion of water functioning solely as a solvent does not adequately reflect the importance of the chemical activity of water on biochemical reactions in vivo. Rather, water is more accurately considered to be not only the solvent but also a critical reactant, the concentration of which can influence a potentially wide spectrum of biochemical processes. These perspectives are supported experimentally by an “osmotic stress” approach that assesses the effect of altering the activity of water on a defined biochemical process through the use of solutes that lower the activity of water but do not otherwise interact with the system, thus allowing quantitation of the number of water molecules participating in that process (Rand, 2004). This approach has been applied to a variety of biochemical processes, including membrane channel dynamics, water soluble enzyme activity, and DNA–protein interactions, in each case demonstrating that reducing the activity of water itself can have a significant effect on the biochemical process in question, whether it be through effects on the preferential hydration of protein surfaces or on specific biochemical reactions that involve changes in hydration (Rand et al., 2000).

The importance of the concentration of water within the cell can also be framed in terms of the macromolecular crowding and confinement model, which considers the effects of excluded volume on biochemical processes within an the cell (Ellis, 2001; Minton, 2001). The environment that exists within a living cell is clearly not composed of a dilute aqueous solution of reactants. Rather, the complex intracellular environment is more accurately described as “crowded,” wherein macromolecules, in aggregate, exist at high concentration and occupy a significant fraction (∼20–30%) of total cell volume (Minton, 2001). Based on this analysis, the degree of crowding by macromolecules, representing excluded volume (i.e., the extent to which available volume is reduced), significantly affects biochemical processes. As a result, the functions of macromolecules within the cell are exquisitely sensitive to small alterations in available intracellular volume that might result from changes in the intracellular concentration of water (Ellis, 2001; Ho, 2003). Biologic systems have thus presumably evolved to function within well-defined ranges of concentration of not only reactants but also water, with the homeostatic regulation of the concentration of water within the cell thus representing a fundamentally critical process. The biologic implication of this concept is that small changes in the concentration of water within the cell have the potential to globally alter biochemical processes, and in so doing establish an intracellular environment detrimental to normal cell function and viability.

OSMOTIC STRESS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. WATER
  4. OSMOTIC STRESS
  5. CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS
  6. OSMOTIC STRESS IN MAMMALS
  7. CONTRIBUTIONS TO OSMOTIC STRESS IN VIVO
  8. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
  9. LITERATURE CITED

The movement of water between aqueous solutions that are separated by a semi-permeable membrane is driven by differences in the concentration of solute particles (also referred to as osmolytes) on either side of the membrane, with water flowing down its concentration gradient from the solution with a lower osmolyte concentration into the solution with a higher concentration. This physical biochemical process, referred to as osmosis, is of fundamental and universal significance to all biologic organisms that utilize a semi-permeable membrane to separate the intracellular milieu from the extracellular environment. The osmotic flow of water crosses the plasma membrane occurs by passive diffusion through water-permeable protein channels called aquaporins (King et al., 2004). In the living cell, changes in osmolyte concentration occurring either within or outside the cell can thus lead to the very rapid flow of water across the plasma membrane and marked alterations in cell volume, but only to the extent that the osmolytes are membrane-impermeable. Given that osmosis resulting from differences in the concentration of membrane-impermeable osmolytes affects the tonicity or volume of the cell, osmotic stress mediated by osmolytes that are predominantly membrane-impermeable is also referred to as tonic stress. Exposure of a cell to a hypertonic environment in which the osmolality outside the cell is greater than that present within the cell results in the osmotic efflux of water, a reduction in cell volume (i.e., cell shrinkage) and an increase in the concentration of all intracellular constituents. The resulting biochemical disequilibrium gives rise to a wide spectrum of deleterious effects on cell function and, in the event biochemical homeostasis is not restored, ultimately results in apoptotic cell death (Table 1). Given the universal role of water as both solvent and reactant, such pleiotropic effects of hypertonic stress on cell function, previously referred as “molecular mayhem” (Proft and Struhl, 2004), are not surprising. However, the effects described above have been observed under ex vivo experimental conditions that involve exposing cultured cell lines to hypertonic stress through the addition of osmolytes such as sodium chloride or sorbitol to the culture medium. The relevance of such experimental manipulations to the biology of mammalian cells outside the kidney, as they exist in vivo, remains unclear.

Table 1. Pleiotropic effects of hypertonic stress on cell function
EffectaReferences
  • a

    Analyses of the effects of hypertonic stress on cell function derive primarily from ex vivo studies employing cultured cell lines.

DNA damageKultz and Chakravarty (2001); Dmitrieva et al. (2004)
Inhibition of DNA repairDmitrieva et al. (2004)
Induction of p53Dmitrieva et al. (2001a,b)
Cell cycle arrestMichea et al. (2000); Alexander et al. (2001); Belli et al. (2001); Dmitrieva et al., (2001b); Escote et al. (2004)
Disruption of mitochondrial functionDesai et al. (2002); Copp et al. (2004)
Dissociation of protein from chromatinProft and Struhl (2004)
Alteration in cytoskeletal architectureDi Ciano et al. (2002)
Induction of secondary oxidative stressZhang et al. (2004)
Inhibition of growth factor-dependent signalingCopp et al. (2004)
Inhibition of mTor pathwayCopp et al. (2004); Fumarola et al. (2004)
Inhibition of protein translation; polysome disaggregationMorley and Naegele (2002); Naegele and Morley (2004)
ApoptosisDmitrieva et al. (2001b); Copp et al. (2004)

CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. WATER
  4. OSMOTIC STRESS
  5. CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS
  6. OSMOTIC STRESS IN MAMMALS
  7. CONTRIBUTIONS TO OSMOTIC STRESS IN VIVO
  8. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
  9. LITERATURE CITED

Specific mechanisms are necessary to rapidly and dynamically compensate for the potentially lethal effects of osmotic stress. The cellular osmotic stress response represents the means by which cells adapt to osmotic stresses in order to optimize cell function and ensure survival. All cells respond to osmotic stress by altering the concentration of osmolytes within the cell in order to reduce or eliminate the difference in intracellular versus extracellular osmolyte concentration, thereby eliminating any change in intracellular water concentration and the concomitant change in cell volume that might occur by osmosis. An immediate cellular response to hyperotonic stress takes place within seconds and involves increases in the intracellular concentrations of charged ions such as potassium, sodium, and chloride that are mediated by pre-existing ion transport systems, including the Na+-K+-2Cl co-transporter, the Na+/H+ exchanger, and the Cl/HCO3 exchanger (McManus et al., 1995; Lang et al., 1998). The instantaneous reduction in cell volume due to the osmotic efflux of water induced by acute hypertonic stress is thus rapidly corrected by what is referred to as a regulatory volume increase. The use of charged ions as compensatory osmolytes, however, results in an increase in intracellular ionic strength that is not compatible with normal cell function. Therefore, the cellular response to hypertonic stress is also mediated by a delayed or adaptive response involving the transcriptional regulation of genes that allow ionic osmolytes to be replaced with non-ionic osmolytes (Burg et al., 1997; Handler and Kwon, 2001). Non-ionic osmolytes, also referred to as compatible or non-perturbing osmolytes, consist of small, non-charged organic molecules that do not affect cell function even at relatively high intracellular concentrations (Yancey et al., 1982). In mammalian cells, these include polyols such as sorbitol and myo-inositol, neutral amino acids, or their derivatives such as taurine or alanine, and methylamines such as betaine. Accumulation of compatible osmolytes within the cell thus maintains intracellular water homeostasis without otherwise impairing normal biochemical function.

The osmotic stress response pathway, best characterized in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by functional genetic and biochemical studies (Hohmann, 2002; Westfall et al., 2004), represents a paradigmatic signaling pathway that functions to sense the extracellular environment and translate that information into an appropriate program of gene expression (Fig. 1A). In yeast, this pathway links the putative osmotic sensor proteins Sln1 and Sho1 to the evolutionarily conserved mitogen-activated kinase Hog1, the homolog of the mammalian p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase. Hog1 regulates the transcription factors Sko1, Hot1, and Msn2p/Msn4, which control genes involved in glycerol synthesis such as glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD1), thus providing a means to increase the intracellular concentration of compatible osmolytes (Fig. 1B).

thumbnail image

Figure 1. The adaptive cellular osmotic stress response pathway. A: Outline of a generic stress response pathway. Adaptation to changes in the extracellular environment, commonly referred to as “cellular stress,” involves the detection or sensing of a change in extracellular conditions, and intracellular signaling events that link the sensing mechanism to adaptive or compensatory changes in gene expression. B: Comparison of the adaptive osmotic stress response pathways of yeast and man. Our current understanding of the osmotic stress response pathway is more complete in yeast as compared to man. However, it would appear that while the Hog1 MAP kinase in yeast sub-serves a pivotal role, this role has been delegated in mammalian cells to a much wider spectrum of kinases, including not only p38, the mammalian homolog of the yeast Hog1 MAP kinase, but also the tyrosine kinase fyn, protein kinase A (PKA), and the DNA damage-inducible kinase ATM. Given the fundamental difference in the biology of yeast as a unicellular organism that is bound by a cell wall with that of mammalian cells that are defined only by a plasma membrane and exist within multi-cellular tissues, the mechanisms involved in sensing osmotic stress likely differ between yeast and man. However, the osmotic sensing mechanism in mammalian cells remains undefined.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The mammalian adaptive osmotic stress response pathway (Fig. 1B) has only more recently been defined as a result of the identification of the mammalian osmoregulatory transcription factor NFAT5, originally designated tonicity enhancer binding protein or TonEBP (Miyakawa et al., 1999b). TonEBP was first identified in a functional genetic screen for proteins capable of binding to a specific tonicity-responsive DNA sequence present within the enhancer region of genes induced in response to hypertonic stress (Miyakawa et al., 1999b), and was also purified by DNA affinity chromatography and designated osmotic response element binding protein (Ko et al., 2000). TonEBP was also identified independently based on protein sequence similarity within the DNA binding domain to transcription factors of the dorsal/rel/NFκB/NFATc family and was designated NFAT5 (Lopez-Rodriguez et al., 1999), NFATL1 (Trama et al., 2000), and NFATz (Pan et al., 2000). Similar to the transcriptional response to osmotic stress in yeast, NFAT5 also regulates the expression of osmocompensatory genes (Fig. 1B). Although the list of NFAT5 target genes is likely incomplete, those genes identified to date function to either increase the intracellular concentration of compatible osmolytes or, in the case of HSP70, to presumably facilitate normal protein folding in an intracellular environment that has been altered as a result of the osmotic loss of intracellular water or an increase in intracellular ionic strength (Table 2). NFAT5 is itself regulated by hypertonicity at multiple levels, including RNA accumulation, protein stability, post-translational modification, and subcellular localization (Trama et al., 2000; Woo et al., 2000; Dahl et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2002). Phosphorylation of NFAT5 by kinases such as p38, fyn (Ko et al., 2002), protein kinase A (Ferraris et al., 2002), and ATM (Irarrazabal et al., 2004) regulate both cytosol-to-nuclear translocation and the function of transcriptional activation domains present within the protein (Lee et al., 2003). Direct interaction between NFAT5 and either PKA or ATM has been demonstrated (Ferraris et al., 2002; Irarrazabal et al., 2004), suggesting that NFAT5 may be a direct substrate for these kinases.

Table 2. NFAT5/TonEBP target genes
Target geneaFunctionReferences
  • a

    Unless otherwise noted, identification of a gene as an NFAT5/TonEBP target is based on a combination of genetic and cell-based functional assays as well as direct DNA binding studies.

  • b

    Although ex vivo assays indicate that NFAT5/TonEBP directly regulates the TauT gene (Ito et al., 2004), NFAT5 null mice exhibit no reduction in TauT expression in the kidney in contrast to the significantly reduced expression of AR, SMIT, and BGT1 (Lopez-Rodriguez et al., 2004).

  • c

    Loss of NFAT5 function in vivo results in the impaired induction of ATA2 mRNA in response to hypertonicity, thus providing functional genetic evidence that NFAT5 regulates ATA2 gene expression. However, direct regulation of the ATA2 gene by NFAT5 has not as yet been demonstrated. The ATA2 gene is thus most accurately considered a potential NFAT5-target gene.

Aldose reductase (AR)Catalyzes reduction of glucose to sorbitolKo et al. (1997); Lopez-Rodriguez et al. (2004)
Sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter (SMIT)Transports myo-inositol across plasma membrane using the Na+ Cl electrochemical gradientRim et al. (1998); Lopez-Rodriguez et al. (2004)
Sodium/chloride/betaine cotransporter (BGT1)Transports betaine across plasma membrane using the Na+ Cl electrochemical gradientMiyakawa et al. (1999a); Lopez-Rodriguez et al. (2004)
Urea transporter (UT-A)Vasopressin-regulated urea transporter; expressed primarily in renal medullaNakayama et al. (2000)
Taurine transporter (TauT)bMembrane transporter for the amino acid taurineIto et al. (2004)
Heat shock protein 70 gene (HSP70-2)Molecular chaperone; protects from urea-induced apoptosisWoo et al. (2002); Go et al. (2004)
Sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter-2 (ATA2, SNAT2)cSystem A neutral amino acid transporterTrama et al. (2002)
Osmotic stress protein of 94 kDa (Osp94)Putative molecular chaperone based on sequence homology to heat shock proteinsKojima et al. (2004)
Aquaporin 2 (AQP2)Plasma membrane water channelLopez-Rodriguez et al. (2004); Kasono et al. (2005)

The Pax2 transcription factor has also recently been shown to be induced by hypertonicity in renal medullary cell lines and in the kidney, where its expression varies with osmolality (Cai et al., 2005). Partial loss of Pax2 function mediated by small interfering RNA resulted in increased apoptotic cell death under hypertonic conditions (Cai et al., 2005). However, in contrast to the ubiquitous expression of NFAT5 mRNA (Trama et al., 2000), Pax2 exhibits a much more restricted pattern of expression (Dressler et al., 1990). Thus, the extent to which Pax2 contributes to the mammalian osmotic stress response remains unclear.

OSMOTIC STRESS IN MAMMALS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. WATER
  4. OSMOTIC STRESS
  5. CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS
  6. OSMOTIC STRESS IN MAMMALS
  7. CONTRIBUTIONS TO OSMOTIC STRESS IN VIVO
  8. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
  9. LITERATURE CITED

The critical importance of NFAT5 in mediating adaptation to hyperosmotic stress within the kidney was demonstrated by targeted disruption of the Nfat5 gene in the mouse, which resulted in a null allele (Lopez-Rodriguez et al., 2004). Although the majority of homozygous Nfat5−/− animals died late in gestation or perinatally, approximately 3% of the homozygous progeny survived past weaning. These animals exhibited marked atrophy of the renal medulla that was associated with impaired activation of several NFAT5-regulated osmoprotective genes (Lopez-Rodriguez et al., 2004). Consistent with this result, transgenic over-expression of a dominant inhibitory form of NFAT5 in the epithelial cells of the renal collecting tubules resulted in an impaired capacity to concentrate urine, leading to progressive hydronephrosis, that was also associated with defects in the expression of osmo-regulatory genes (Lam et al., 2004). Thus, as expected based on the unique physiology of the mammalian kidney, which is characterized by the generation of a hyperosmotic environment within the renal medulla during antidiuresis, the osmotic stress response pathway defined by the NFAT5 transcription factor is clearly essential for normal renal function.

In contrast to the increasingly well-defined and critical role for NFAT5 and the adaptive osmotic stress response pathway within the context of the unique physiology of the kidney, the function of NFAT5 and the significance of the osmotic stress response outside the kidney have only more recently become apparent. Initial studies demonstrated that while NFAT5 mRNA is ubiquitously expressed in all tissues, expression of NFAT5 protein was largely restricted to the thymus and activated lymphocytes (Trama et al., 2000). However, given that the osmolality of blood, and presumably that of interstitial tissue fluids, are maintained within a very narrow window of osmolality as described above, the function of NFAT5 and the relevance of the osmotic stress response in lymphocytes have remained unclear. Initial functional studies of role of NFAT5 in the immune system demonstrated that partial loss of NFAT5 function mediated by transgenic expression of a dominant inhibitory form of the NFAT5 protein resulted in lymphoid hypocellularity and impaired T lymphocyte growth and survival under conditions of hyperosmotic stress (Trama et al., 2002). This result was further substantiated in mice engineered by gene targeting to express a non-functional, dominantly inhibitory NFAT5 deletion mutant that exhibited partial loss of NFAT5 function in the heterozygous state and complete loss of function in the homozygous state (Go et al., 2004). Although homozygous animals die perinatally, consistent with the phenotype of animals that are homozygous for the null allele (Lopez-Rodriguez et al., 2004), heterozygous animals were viable and exhibited an immunologic phenotype very similar to that of animals expressing a dominant negative transgene, including an impaired T cell-dependent antibody response upon immunization (Go et al., 2004). Moreover, direct measurements demonstrated that normal lymphoid tissue osmolality was greater than that of blood (Go et al., 2004), providing evidence that hyperosmotic conditions are not limited to the renal medulla. Interestingly, while heterozygous animals exhibited no defect in renal function under conditions of normal hydration, water deprivation revealed an impaired ability to concentrate urine specifically in male mice (Park et al., 2004). To the extent that NFAT5 function is limited to the regulation of osmocompensatory gene expression (Table 1), functional genetic studies thus indicate that T cell development in the thymus and lymphocyte function during an immune response exhibit greater dependence on an functional osmotic stress response pathway than does renal function under conditions of normal (i.e., ad lib) hydration (Trama et al., 2002; Go et al., 2004).

CONTRIBUTIONS TO OSMOTIC STRESS IN VIVO

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. WATER
  4. OSMOTIC STRESS
  5. CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS
  6. OSMOTIC STRESS IN MAMMALS
  7. CONTRIBUTIONS TO OSMOTIC STRESS IN VIVO
  8. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
  9. LITERATURE CITED

Further consideration of the critical role of the osmotic stress response to lymphocyte function provides interesting insights into not only osmotic stress associated with specific tissue microenvironments, but also the potential effects of cell metabolism on intracellular water homeostasis as a source of cellular osmotic stress. Direct measurement of tissue osmolality by vapor pressure osmometry indicates that, in contrast to the highly precise regulation of intravascular osmolality, tissue osmolality appears to be significantly more variable, with lymphoid and hepatic tissues being hyperosmolar as compared to blood, brain, or lung (Go et al., 2004). Osmotic stress under normal physiologic conditions outside the kidney thus appears to represent a previously unappreciated form of extracellular environmental stress. However, relative to the extremes of hyperosmotic stress to which cells of the renal medulla may be exposed during antidiuresis, the osmolality of tissues such as the spleen or thymus, as measured using vapor pressure osmometry, is only modestly elevated above that of blood (Go et al., 2004). One significant limitation in the measurement of tissue osmolality by vapor pressure osmometry is poor spatial resolution. Such measurements are incapable of measuring the osmolality present within a distinct tissue microenvironment such as the germinal center of a lymph node where extensive cell proliferation takes place. In addition, this approach does not permit distinction between intravascular and extravascular (interstitial) tissue fluid. Thus, the values for tissue osmolality obtained by vapor pressure osmometry may represent an underestimate of the actual osmolality to which cells may be exposed in vivo within specific tissue microenvironments.

Assuming that the extracellular osmotic stress to which lymphocytes are exposed in vivo is in fact limited, the expression of NFAT5 protein in thymus and activated lymphocytes (Trama et al., 2000) and the observed dependence of lymphocyte function on the NFAT5 osmotic stress response pathway (Trama et al., 2002; Go et al., 2004) would suggest that there are other mechanisms through which lymphocytes are exposed to osmotic stress in the thymus and during an immune response occurring within peripheral lymphoid tissues. Interestingly, immature thymocytes and activated lymphocytes undergo rapid cell proliferation, which is associated with a high rate of metabolic activity (Shortman et al., 1990; Frauwirth and Thompson, 2004). In addition, although most tissues express low or indetectable levels of the NFAT5 protein, NFAT5 protein is readily detectable in essentially all constitutively proliferating cell lines maintained in tissue culture (Lopez-Rodriguez et al., 1999; Miyakawa et al., 1999b; Ko et al., 2000; Trama et al., 2000). These observations suggest that cell proliferation or the state of cellular metabolic activity may determine the extent to which a cell is dependent on the osmotic stress response. As previously suggested (Ho, 2003), changes that occur within the cell as a result of active metabolism/cell division likely give rise to the same alterations in intracellular water homeostasis that also result from exposure to overt extracellular hypertonicity. Active cell metabolism and cell proliferation lead to a decrease in available intracellular volume as a result of the induction of macromolecular biosynthesis. In addition, biosynthesis involves the consumption of precursors such as amino acids and inositol, which function as intracellular osmolytes. These changes result in a decrease in the concentration of intracellular water and thus represent an osmotic stress that is functionally identical to exposing a cell to extracellular hypertonicity. Consistent with this hypothesis, culture of human fibroblasts under isotonic conditions lacking free amino acids, which leads to a reduction in the concentration of intracellular amino acids and a concomitant reduction in cell volume, results in activation of NFAT5, as measured by increased NFAT5 protein abundance and enhanced nuclear translocation (Franchi-Gazzola et al., 2001). Thus, the osmotic stress response pathway defined by NFAT5 appears to mediate cellular adaptation not only to overt extracellular osmotic stress, but also rather to any process that affects intracellular water homeostasis.

The critical importance of the NFAT5 osmotic stress response to both kidney function (Lam et al., 2004; Lopez-Rodriguez et al., 2004) and adaptive immunity (Trama et al., 2002; Go et al., 2004) highlights a concept in which functional osmotic stress represents the manifestation of alterations in intracellular water homeostasis occurring by distinct mechanisms within uniquely different physiologic contexts (Fig. 2). Altered intracellular water homeostasis in the kidney results predominantly from the marked extracellular hyperosmotic stress generated within the renal medulla that is necessary to permit reabsorption of water. Given that cells present within the renal medulla are typically non-proliferative, nor are they highly active metabolically, the contribution of intracellular osmotic stress is limited. In contrast, while extracellular osmotic stress within lymphoid tissues is limited, particularly in comparison to the renal medulla, altered intracellular water homeostasis and thus osmotic stress likely results from the high level of metabolic activity associated with rapid cell proliferation. Extracellular osmotic stress and cellular metabolic activity in combination may be thus considered to give rise to functional osmotic stress, which reflects the degree to which the concentration or activity of water within the cell no longer supports optimal biochemical functions. Thus, although the mechanisms contributing to functional osmotic stress in the kidney and in lymphoid tissues differ significantly, intracellular water homeostasis is altered to an extent that makes each tissue similarly dependent on the NFAT5 osmotic stress response.

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Extracellular and intracellular contributions to functional osmotic stress. A: In man, osmolality can range from 290 mOsm, which is the osmolality of blood, to as high as 1,500 mOsm, which represents the osmolality of the renal medulla during antidiuresis. The osmolality of tissues outside the kidney, in studies of low spatial resolution, ranges from that of blood for tissues such as brain and lung to as high as 350 mOsm for spleen, thymus, and liver (Go et al., 2004). Cellular metabolic activity varies from low, in the case of quiescent cells such as naïve lymphocytes, to intermediate for metabolically active but non-proliferating cells such as liver cells or renal tubular epithelial cells, to very high for rapidly dividing cells such as activated lymphocytes. Functional osmotic stress and dependence on the osmotic stress response is most likely determined not only by changes in extracellular osmolality but also by the state of cellular metabolic activity, both of which influence intracellular water homeostasis. A cell of low or intermediate metabolic activity present within a tissue microenvironment associated with high extracellular osmolality, such as cells of the renal medulla (B), may be subject to a level of functional osmotic stress equivalent to that of cells of very high metabolic activity that are present in a tissue microenvironment associated with low or intermediate osmolality, such as activated lymphocytes present within the germinal center of a lymph node during an immune response (C). [This figure appears in color in the online version at www.interscience.wiley.com.]

Download figure to PowerPoint

As previously mentioned, while mice with partial loss of NFAT5 function exhibited impaired lymphocyte function (Trama et al., 2002; Go et al., 2004), impaired renal function was observed only under conditions of water deprivation (Park et al., 2004). The greater sensitivity of lymphocytes to partial loss of NFAT5 function thus suggests that a high rate of metabolic activity (e.g., cell division) may render a cell particularly sensitive to osmotic stress as compared to a cell that is in a metabolically more quiescent state. For example, during the course of an adaptive immune response quiescent T and B lymphocytes are activated to undergo massive macromolecular biosynthesis and rapid cell division within a very short period of time in order to effectively counter the very rapid rate of replication of infectious pathogen. Small changes in the intracellular concentration of water may be much more deleterious to a metabolically highly active cell that is critically dependent on the proper integration of a wide spectrum of interdependent metabolic and biosynthetic pathways, as compared to a cell that is metabolically less active. As a result, the significantly lower level of extracellular osmotic stress that may be present in tissues other than the kidney, when combined with potential osmotic stress inherent in active cell metabolism or cell division, may be sufficient to render a cell critically dependent on the induction of an adaptive osmotic stress response. Considerations such as these suggest that the osmotic stress response must be considered within the context of intracellular water homeostasis, which is influenced not only by the extracellular environment present within a given tissue, but also by cellular metabolic activity.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. WATER
  4. OSMOTIC STRESS
  5. CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS
  6. OSMOTIC STRESS IN MAMMALS
  7. CONTRIBUTIONS TO OSMOTIC STRESS IN VIVO
  8. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
  9. LITERATURE CITED

Unexpected observations often reveal important new insights. The critical importance of the NFAT5 osmotic stress response pathway to the adaptive immune response in vivo has given rise to interesting new insights concerning intracellular water homeostasis in mammals and the potential contribution of both the extracellular tissue microenvironment and cell-intrinsic metabolic activity to osmotic stress. The availability of animal models and cell lines deficient in NFAT5 activity, and thus defective in the osmotic stress response defined by NFAT5, should provide useful tools to further explore the importance of intracellular water homeostasis in mammals within various biologic contexts. Moreover, realization of the fundamental importance of intracellular water homeostasis to mammalian cell biology will no doubt provide the impetus to further define the molecular basis of the mammalian osmotic stress response pathway. Finally, given the fundamental importance of intracellular water homeostasis to basic cell biology, further consideration of osmotic stress and the mammalian osmotic stress response within the context of pathophysiologic conditions such as cancer or inflammation may lead to novel therapeutic approaches to treat human diseases.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. WATER
  4. OSMOTIC STRESS
  5. CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC STRESS
  6. OSMOTIC STRESS IN MAMMALS
  7. CONTRIBUTIONS TO OSMOTIC STRESS IN VIVO
  8. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
  9. LITERATURE CITED
  • Alexander MR, Tyers M, Perret M, Craig BM, Fang KS, Gustin MC. 2001. Regulation of cell cycle progression by Swe1p and Hog1p following hypertonic stress. Mol Biol Cell 12(1): 5362.
  • Belli G, Gari E, Aldea M, Herrero E. 2001. Osmotic stress causes a G1 cell cycle delay and downregulation of Cln3/Cdc28 activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 39(4): 10221035.
  • Burg MB, Kwon ED, Kultz D. 1997. Regulation of gene expression by hypertonicity. Annu Rev Physiol 59: 437455.
  • Cai Q, Dmitrieva NI, Ferraris JD, Brooks HL, van Balkom BW, Burg M. 2005. Pax2 expression occurs in renal medullary epithelial cells in vivo and in cell culture, is osmoregulated, and promotes osmotic tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(2): 503508.
  • Causton HC, Ren B, Koh SS, Harbison CT, Kanin E, Jennings EG, Lee TI, True HL, Lander ES, Young RA. 2001. Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 12(2): 323337.
  • Copp J, Wiley S, Ward MW, Van Der Geer P. 2005. Hypertonic shock inhibits growth factor receptor signaling, induces caspase 3 activation, and causes reversible fragmentation of the mitochondrial network. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 288(2): C403C415.
  • Dahl SC, Handler JS, Kwon HM. 2001. Hypertonicity-induced phosphorylation and nuclear localization of the transcription factor TonEBP. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 280(2): C248253.
  • Desai BN, Myers BR, Schreiber SL. 2002. FKBP12-rapamycin-associated protein associates with mitochondria and senses osmotic stress via mitochondrial dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(7): 43194324.
  • Di Ciano C, Nie Z, Szaszi K, Lewis A, Uruno T, Zhan X, Rotstein OD, Mak A, Kapus A. 2002. Osmotic stress-induced remodeling of the cortical cytoskeleton. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 283(3): C850C865.
  • Dmitrieva N, Michea L, Burg M. 2001a. p53 Protects renal inner medullary cells from hypertonic stress by restricting DNA replication. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281(3): F522F530.
  • Dmitrieva NI, Michea LF, Rocha GM, Burg MB. 2001b. Cell cycle delay and apoptosis in response to osmotic stress. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 130(3): 411420.
  • Dmitrieva NI, Cai Q, Burg MB. 2004. Cells adapted to high NaCl have many DNA breaks and impaired DNA repair both in cell culture and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(8): 23172322.
  • Dressler GR, Deutsch U, Chowdhury K, Nornes HO, Gruss P. 1990. Pax2, a new murine paired-box-containing gene and its expression in the developing excretory system. Development 109(4): 787795.
  • Ellis RJ. 2001. Macromolecular crowding: Obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem Sci 26(10): 597604.
  • Escote X, Zapater M, Clotet J, Posas F. 2004. Hog1 mediates cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase by the dual targeting of Sic1. Nat Cell Biol 6(10): 9971002.
  • Ferraris JD, Persaud P, Williams CK, Chen Y, Burg MB. 2002. cAMP-independent role of PKA in tonicity-induced transactivation of tonicity-responsive enhancer/osmotic response element-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(26): 1680016805.
  • Franchi-Gazzola R, Visigalli R, Dall'Asta V, Sala R, Woo SK, Kwon HM, Gazzola GC, Bussolati O. 2001. Amino acid depletion activates TonEBP and sodium-coupled inositol transport. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 280(6): C1465C1474.
  • Frauwirth KA, Thompson CB. 2004. Regulation of T lymphocyte metabolism. J Immunol 172(8): 46614665.
  • Fumarola C, Monica SL, Guidotti GG. 2005. Amino acid signaling through the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway: Role of glutamine and of cell shrinkage. J Cell Physiol 204: 155165.
  • Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11(12): 42414257.
  • Go WY, Liu X, Roti MA, Liu F, Ho SN. 2004. NFAT5/TonEBP mutant mice define osmotic stress as a critical feature of the lymphoid microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(29): 1067310678.
  • Guyton AC, Hall JE. 1996. Textbook of medical physiology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.
  • Handler JS, Kwon HM. 2001. Transcriptional regulation by changes in tonicity. Kidney Int 60(2): 408411.
  • Henderson LJ. 1913. The fitness of the environment. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Ho SN. 2003. The role of NFAT5/TonEBP in establishing an optimal intracellular environment. Arch Biochem Biophys 413(2): 151157.
  • Hochachka PW, Somero GN. 2002. Biochemical adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hohmann S. 2002. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66(2): 300372.
  • Irarrazabal CE, Liu JC, Burg MB, Ferraris JD. 2004. ATM, a DNA damage-inducible kinase, contributes to activation by high NaCl of the transcription factor TonEBP/OREBP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(23): 88098814.
  • Ito T, Fujio Y, Hirata M, Takatani T, Matsuda T, Muraoka S, Takahashi K, Azuma J. 2004. Expression of taurine transporter is regulated through the TonE (tonicity-responsive element)/TonEBP (TonE-binding protein) pathway and contributes to cytoprotection in HepG2 cells. Biochem J Pt 382: 177182.
  • Kasono K, Saito T, Tamemoto H, Yanagidate C, Uchida S, Kawakami M, Sasaki S, Ishikawa SE. 2005. Hypertonicity regulates the aquaporin-2 promoter independently of arginine vasopressin. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20: 509515.
  • King LS, Kozono D, Agre P. 2004. From structure to disease: The evolving tale of aquaporin biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5(9): 687698.
  • Knepper MA, Rector FC Jr. 1996. Chapter 13. Urine concentration and dilution. In: BrennerBM, editor. The kidney. 5 edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
  • Ko BC, Ruepp B, Bohren KM, Gabbay KH, Chung SS. 1997. Identification and characterization of multiple osmotic response sequences in the human aldose reductase gene. J Biol Chem 272(26): 1643116437.
  • Ko BC, Turck CW, Lee KW, Yang Y, Chung SS. 2000. Purification, identification, and characterization of an osmotic response element binding protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 270(1): 5261.
  • Ko BC, Lam AK, Kapus A, Fan L, Chung SK, Chung SS. 2002. Fyn and p38 signaling are both required for maximal hypertonic activation of the osmotic response element-binding protein/tonicity-responsive enhancer-binding protein (OREBP/TonEBP). J Biol Chem 277(48): 4608546092.
  • Kojima R, Randall JD, Ito E, Manshio H, Suzuki Y, Gullans SR. 2004. Regulation of expression of the stress response gene, Osp94: identification of the tonicity response element and intracellular signalling pathways. Biochem J 380(Pt 3): 783794.
  • Kultz D. 2003. Evolution of the cellular stress proteome: from monophyletic origin to ubiquitous function. J Exp Biol 206(Pt 18): 31193124.
  • Kultz D, Chakravarty D. 2001. Hyperosmolality in the form of elevated NaCl but not urea causes DNA damage in murine kidney cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(4): 19992004.
  • Lam AK, Ko BC, Tam S, Morris R, Yang JY, Chung SK, Chung SS. 2004. Osmotic response element binding protein (OREBP) is an essential regulator of urine concentrating mechanism. J Biol Chem 279: 4804848054.
  • Lang F, Busch GL, Ritter M, Volkl H, Waldegger S, Gulbins E, Haussinger D. 1998. Functional significance of cell volume regulatory mechanisms. Physiol Rev 78(1): 247306.
  • Lee SD, Woo SK, Kwon HM. 2002. Dimerization is required for phosphorylation and DNA binding of TonEBP/NFAT5. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 294(5): 968975.
  • Lee SD, Colla E, Sheen MR, Na KY, Kwon HM. 2003. Multiple domains of TonEBP cooperate to stimulate transcription in response to hypertonicity. J Biol Chem 278: 4757147577.
  • Lopez-Rodriguez C, Aramburu J, Rakeman AS, Rao A. 1999. NFAT5, a constitutively nuclear NFAT protein that does not cooperate with Fos and Jun. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(13): 72147219.
  • Lopez-Rodriguez C, Antos CL, Shelton JM, Richardson JA, Lin F, Novobrantseva TI, Bronson RT, Igarashi P, Rao A, Olson EN. 2004. Loss of NFAT5 results in renal atrophy and lack of tonicity-responsive gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(8): 23922397.
  • McManus ML, Churchwell KB, Strange K. 1995. Regulation of cell volume in health and disease. N Engl J Med 333(19): 12601266.
  • Michea L, Ferguson DR, Peters EM, Andrews PM, Kirby MR, Burg MB. 2000. Cell cycle delay and apoptosis are induced by high salt and urea in renal medullary cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278(2): F209F218.
  • Minton AP. 2001. The influence of macromolecular crowding and macromolecular confinement on biochemical reactions in physiological media. J Biol Chem 276(14): 1057710580.
  • Miyakawa H, Rim JS, Handler JS, Kwon HM. 1999a. Identification of the second tonicity-responsive enhancer for the betaine transporter (BGT1) gene. Biochim Biophys Acta 1446(3): 359364.
  • Miyakawa H, Woo SK, Dahl SC, Handler JS, Kwon HM. 1999b. Tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein, a rel-like protein that stimulates transcription in response to hypertonicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(5): 25382542.
  • Morley SJ, Naegele S. 2002. Phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4E is not required for de novo protein synthesis following recovery from hypertonic stress in human kidney cells. J Biol Chem 277(36): 3285532859.
  • Naegele S, Morley SJ. 2004. Molecular cross-talk between MEK1/2 and mTOR signaling during recovery of 293 cells from hypertonic stress. J Biol Chem 279(44): 4602346034.
  • Nakayama Y, Peng T, Sands JM, Bagnasco SM. 2000. The TonE/TonEBP pathway mediates tonicity-responsive regulation of UT-A urea transporter expression. J Biol Chem 275(49): 3827538280.
  • Pan S, Tsuruta R, Masuda ES, Imamura R, Bazan F, Arai K, Arai N, Miyatake S. 2000. NFATz: A novel rel similarity domain containing protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 272(3): 765776.
  • Park JH, Kim DJ, Jeon US, Go WY, Ho SN, Woo SK, Kwon HM. Urinary concentration defects in TonEBP +/− mice. 2004.
  • Parsegian VA, Rand RP, Rau DC. 2000. Osmotic stress, crowding, preferential hydration, and binding: A comparison of perspectives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(8): 39873992.
  • Proft M, Struhl K. 2004. MAP kinase-mediated stress relief that precedes and regulates the timing of transcriptional induction. Cell 118(3): 351361.
  • Rand RP. 2004. Probing the role of water in protein conformation and function. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359(1448): 12771284; discussion 1284–1285.
  • Rand RP, Parsegian VA, Rau DC. 2000. Intracellular osmotic action. Cell Mol Life Sci 57(7): 10181032.
  • Rim JS, Atta MG, Dahl SC, Berry GT, Handler JS, Kwon HM. 1998. Transcription of the sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter gene is regulated by multiple tonicity-responsive enhancers spread over 50 kilobase pairs in the 5′-flanking region. J Biol Chem 273(32): 2061520621.
  • Shortman K, Egerton M, Spangrude GJ, Scollay R. 1990. The generation and fate of thymocytes. Semin Immunol 2(1): 312.
  • Trama J, Lu Q, Hawley RG, Ho SN. 2000. The NFAT-related protein NFATL1 (TonEBP/NFAT5) is induced upon T cell activation in a calcineurin-dependent manner. J Immunol 165(9): 48844894.
  • Trama J, Go WY, Ho SN. 2002. The osmoprotective function of the NFAT5 transcription factor in T cell development and activation. J Immunol 169(10): 54775488.
  • Westfall PJ, Ballon DR, Thorner J. 2004. When the stress of your environment makes you go HOG wild. Science 306(5701): 15111512.
  • Woo SK, Maouyo D, Handler JS, Kwon HM. 2000. Nuclear redistribution of tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein requires proteasome activity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 278(2): C323C330.
  • Woo SK, Lee SD, Na KY, Park WK, Kwon HM. 2002. TonEBP/NFAT5 stimulates transcription of HSP70 in response to hypertonicity. Mol Cell Biol 22(16): 57535760.
  • Yancey PH, Clark ME, Hand SC, Bowlus RD, Somero GN. 1982. Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science 217(4566): 12141222.
  • Zhang Z, Dmitrieva NI, Park JH, Levine RL, Burg MB. 2004. High urea and NaCl carbonylate proteins in renal cells in culture and in vivo, and high urea causes 8-oxoguanine lesions in their DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(25): 94919496.