Differential mesengenic potential and expression of stem cell-fate modulators in mesenchymal stromal cells from human-term placenta and bone marrow

Authors

  • Pamela A. Jaramillo-Ferrada,

    1. Tissue Engineering and Microfluidics Laboratory, Australian Institute for Bioengineering & Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    2. Stem Cell Engineering Group, Australian Institute for Bioengineering & Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ernst J. Wolvetang,

    1. Stem Cell Engineering Group, Australian Institute for Bioengineering & Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Justin J. Cooper-White

    Corresponding author
    1. Tissue Engineering and Microfluidics Laboratory, Australian Institute for Bioengineering & Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    • Tissue Engineering and Microfluidics Laboratory, Australian Institute for Bioengineering & Nanotechnology (AIBN), Cnr College and Cooper Rd (Building 75), The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Placenta has attracted increasing attention over the past decade as a stem cell source for regenerative medicine. In particular, the amniochorionic membrane has been shown to harbor populations of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). In this study, we have characterized ex vivo expanded MSCs from the human amniotic (hAMSCs) and chorionic (hCMSCs) membranes of human full-term placentas and adult bone marrow (hBMSCs). Our results show that hAMSCs, hCMSCs, and hBMSCs express typical mesenchymal (CD73, CD90, CD105, CD44, CD146, CD166) and pluripotent (Oct-4, Sox2, Nanog, Lin28, and Klf4) markers but not hematopoietic markers (CD45, CD34). Ex vivo expanded hAMSCs were found to be of fetal origin, while hCMSCs cultures contained only maternal cells. Cell proliferation was significantly higher in hCMSCs, compared to hAMSCs and hBMSCs. Integrin profiling revealed marked differences in the expression of α subunits between the three cell sources. Cadherin receptors were consistently expressed on a subset of progenitors (ranging from 1% to 60%), while N-CAM (CD56) was only expressed in hAMSCs and hCMSCs but not in hBMSCs. When induced to differentiate, hAMSCs and hCMSCs displayed strong chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential but very limited capacity for adipogenic conversion. In contrast, hBMSCs showed strong differentiation potential along the three lineages. These results illustrate how MSCs from different ontological sources display differential expression of cell-fate mediators and mesodermal differentiation capacity. J. Cell. Physiol. 227: 3234–3242, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ancillary