1097-4660/asset/JCTB_left.gif?v=1&s=c95b855a493b3ffd369c7c4c298c02287506cf71)
1097-4660/asset/JCTB_right.gif?v=1&s=2384d55c286ae4e457a2a834b9640301974768c9)
Research Article
Methane treatment in biotrickling filters packed with inert materials in presence of a non-ionic surfactant
Article first published online: 30 APR 2012
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.3811
Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry
Issue
Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology
Special Issue: Biotechniques for Air Pollution Control and Bioenergy
Volume 87, Issue 6, pages 848–853, June 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Avalos Ramirez, A., Jones, J. P. and Heitz, M. (2012), Methane treatment in biotrickling filters packed with inert materials in presence of a non-ionic surfactant. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 87: 848–853. doi: 10.1002/jctb.3811
Publication History
- Issue published online: 17 MAY 2012
- Article first published online: 30 APR 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 FEB 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 28 FEB 2012
- Manuscript Received: 9 OCT 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- methane;
- biotrickling filter;
- non-ionic surfactant;
- inert packing material
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The treatment of methane in bioreactors with an aqueous phase such as biofilters is limited by low methane water solubility. In the case of biotrickling filters (BTF), the continuous trickling water is a barrier to methane transfer. In a previous study, the use of non-ionic surfactants improved the performance of biofilters treating methane.
RESULTS: Three BTFs treating methane were operated for 1 year under fixed operating conditions of methane concentration of 4.8 g m−3 and air flow rate of 0.25 m−3 h−1. Three kinds of packing material were tested and a non-ionic surfactant (Brij 35) was periodically added to the nutrient solution at a concentration of 0.5% w/w. Methane conversion was a function of the type of packing materials and the presence of Brij 35 in the nutrient solution. When Brij 35 was added, the methane conversion doubled with respect to the BTFs without surfactant.
CONCLUSION: The addition of Brij 35 to the nutrient solution increased the performance of the BTF for the three packing materials tested. The non-ionic surfactant also affected the carbon dioxide production. The BTFs were stable when the packed bed was washed to remove the excess of biomass. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry