Topical Paper
Circadian organization and the role of the pineal in birds
Article first published online: 23 MAR 2001
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1068
Copyright © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Issue
1097-0029/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=43ac34a0c5790efa9b3c9852600b3b1d1fb6e338)
Microscopy Research and Technique
Special Issue: The Avian Pineal Gland
Volume 53, Issue 1, pages 48–62, 1 April 2001
Additional Information
How to Cite
Underwood, H., Steele, C. T. and Zivkovic, B. (2001), Circadian organization and the role of the pineal in birds. Microsc. Res. Tech., 53: 48–62. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1068
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 MAR 2001
- Article first published online: 23 MAR 2001
- Manuscript Accepted: 19 MAY 2000
- Manuscript Received: 25 APR 2000
Funded by
- NIH. Grant Number: ROI NS20961
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- avian;
- melatonin;
- suprachiasmatic nucleus;
- extraretinal photoreception;
- ocular pacemaker
Abstract
All organisms exhibit significant daily rhythms in a myriad of functions from molecular levels to the level of the whole organism. Significantly, most of these rhythms will persist under constant conditions, showing that they are driven by an internal circadian clock. In birds the circadian system is composed of several interacting sites, each of which may contain a circadian clock. These sites include the pineal organ, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, and, in some species, the eyes. Light is the most powerful entraining stimulus for circadian rhythms and, in birds, light can affect the system via three different pathways: the eyes, the pineal, and extraretinal photoreceptors located in the deep brain. Circadian pacemakers in the pineal and in the eyes of some avian species communicate with the hypothalamic pacemakers via the rhythmic synthesis and release of the hormone melatonin. Often the hypothalamic pacemakers are unable to sustain persistent rhythmicity in constant conditions in the absence of periodic melatonin input from the pineal (or eyes). It has also been proposed that pineal pacemakers may be unable to sustain rhythmicity in constant conditions without periodic neural input from the SCN. Significant variation can occur among birds in the relative roles that the pineal, the SCN, and the eyes play within the circadian system; for example, in the house sparrow pacemakers in the pineal play the predominant role, in the pigeon circadian pacemakers in both the pineal and eyes play a significant role, and in Japanese quail ocular pacemakers play the predominant role. Microsc. Res. Tech. 53:48–62, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1097-0029/asset/JEMT_left.gif?v=1&s=328bfc988dc6023d3c0e23054e952bf3444cffc8)