Research Article
X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research
Article first published online: 21 JAN 2010
DOI: 10.1002/jez.589
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company
Issue

Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology
Volume 313A, Issue 5, pages 262–279, 1 June 2010
Additional Information
How to Cite
Brainerd, E. L., Baier, D. B., Gatesy, S. M., Hedrick, T. L., Metzger, K. A., Gilbert, S. L. and Crisco, J. J. (2010), X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research. J. Exp. Zool., 313A: 262–279. doi: 10.1002/jez.589
Publication History
- Issue published online: 11 MAY 2010
- Article first published online: 21 JAN 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 DEC 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 5 NOV 2009
- Manuscript Received: 12 MAY 2009
Funded by
- W.M. Keck Foundation
- RIH Orthopaedic Foundation
- Bushnell Faculty Research Fund
- U.S. National Science Foundation. Grant Numbers: 0552051, 0532159, 0840950
Abstract
X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM) comprises a set of 3D X-ray motion analysis techniques that merge motion data from in vivo X-ray videos with skeletal morphology data from bone scans into precise and accurate animations of 3D bones moving in 3D space. XROMM methods include: (1) manual alignment (registration) of bone models to video sequences, i.e., Scientific Rotoscoping; (2) computer vision-based autoregistration of bone models to biplanar X-ray videos; and (3) marker-based registration of bone models to biplanar X-ray videos. Here, we describe a novel set of X-ray hardware, software, and workflows for marker-based XROMM. Refurbished C-arm fluoroscopes retrofitted with high-speed video cameras offer a relatively inexpensive X-ray hardware solution for comparative biomechanics research. Precision for our biplanar C-arm hardware and analysis software, measured as the standard deviation of pairwise distances between 1 mm tantalum markers embedded in rigid objects, was found to be ±0.046 mm under optimal conditions and ±0.084 mm under actual in vivo recording conditions. Mean error in measurement of a known distance between two beads was within the 0.01 mm fabrication tolerance of the test object, and mean absolute error was 0.037 mm. Animating 3D bone models from sets of marker positions (XROMM animation) makes it possible to study skeletal kinematics in the context of detailed bone morphology. The biplanar fluoroscopy hardware and computational methods described here should make XROMM an accessible and useful addition to the available technologies for studying the form, function, and evolution of vertebrate animals. J. Exp. Zool. 313A:262–279, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1932-5231/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=3a5bfae8658d16961e7b8f5387220b6eb73c4e31)