Research Article
Comparison of the morphology of the limbs of juvenile and adult horses (Equus caballus) and their implications on the locomotor biomechanics
Article first published online: 8 MAR 2010
DOI: 10.1002/jez.598
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company
Issue

Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology
Volume 313A, Issue 5, pages 292–300, 1 June 2010
Additional Information
How to Cite
Grossi, B. and Canals, M. (2010), Comparison of the morphology of the limbs of juvenile and adult horses (Equus caballus) and their implications on the locomotor biomechanics. J. Exp. Zool., 313A: 292–300. doi: 10.1002/jez.598
Publication History
- Issue published online: 11 MAY 2010
- Article first published online: 8 MAR 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 FEB 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 16 DEC 2009
- Manuscript Received: 19 MAY 2009
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
We analyzed the morphology and the walk–trot and trot–gallop transition velocities of nine juvenile horses and compared them with their mothers. We also compared the relative stride length and the duty factor of the juveniles with respect to adults at three equivalent trotting speeds (Froude numbers 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0), to determine dynamic similarity. Juveniles had a negative allometry in their leg bones, mainly because of little size changes of the distal portions. The negative allometry of extremities allows juveniles to increase stride length without increasing step frequency, which can be biomechanically advantageous. The Froude number during the walk–trot velocity transition of juveniles was similar to that of adult horses, but walk–trot transition velocity in juveniles was greater than expected for their mass. However, during the change trot–gallop, the trot–gallop velocity transition was conserved, but the Froude number was lower. Thus, juvenile horses did not move in a manner that was dynamically similar to the adult horses. At low speed (walk–trot), the gait approaches the behavior predicted by the inverted pendulum model, but at high speed (trot–gallop) dominates the inertial forces. The trot–gallop gait change would be conducted at speeds that would minimize energy costs of transport owing to collisions and changes in the trajectory of the center of mass. J. Exp. Zool. 313A:292–300, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1932-5231/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=3a5bfae8658d16961e7b8f5387220b6eb73c4e31)