In-situ CO2 monitoring network evaluation and design: A criterion based on atmospheric CO2 variability
Version of Record online: 25 FEB 2013
©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume 118, Issue 4, pages 2007–2018, 27 February 2013
How to Cite
2013), In-situ CO2 monitoring network evaluation and design: A criterion based on atmospheric CO2 variability, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 2007–2018, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50168., , , and (
- Issue online: 17 APR 2013
- Version of Record online: 25 FEB 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 16 JAN 2013 12:00AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 7 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 4 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Received: 3 JUL 2012
All Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
|2012JD018419Rts01.txt||plain text document||3K||List of existing observation locations used in the synthetic data experiments. Latitude and longitude are in degrees, above ground level is in meters, and σR (model-data mismatch parameter) is expressed as a standard deviation in ppm.|
|2012JD018419Rts02.txt||plain text document||3K||List of proposed additional measurement locations for the 1 CL and ½ CL networks. All 2008 towers are included in 1 CL and ½ CL networks, as are all 1 CL towers included in the ½ CL network. Latitude and longitude are in degrees, and σR (model-data mismatch parameter) is expressed as a standard deviation in ppm. All towers are assumed to be representative of the bottom layer in PCTM-CASA (i.e., 80 m).|
|2012JD018419Rreadme.txt||plain text document||2K||Supporting Information|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.