Modeling past and future surface mass balance of the Northern Patagonia Icefield
Article first published online: 6 MAY 2013
©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Volume 118, Issue 2, pages 571–588, June 2013
How to Cite
2013), Modeling past and future surface mass balance of the Northern Patagonia Icefield, J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf., 118, 571–588 doi:10.1002/jgrf.20038., , , and (
- Issue published online: 18 JUL 2013
- Article first published online: 6 MAY 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 22 FEB 2013 01:39PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 20 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Received: 20 JUL 2012
- sea-level rise;
- mass balance
 Glaciers are strongly retreating and thinning in Patagonia. We present new inferences about the climatic situation and the surface mass balance on the Northern Patagonia Icefield in the past and the future using a combined modeling approach. The simulations are driven by NCAR/NCEP Reanalysis and ECHAM5 data, which were physically downscaled using the Weather Research and Forecasting regional climate model and simple sub-grid parameterizations. The surface mass balance model was calibrated with geodetic mass balance data of three large non-calving glaciers and with point mass balance measurements. An increase of accumulation on the Northern Patagonia Icefield was detected from 1990–2011 as compared to 1975–1990. Using geodetic mass balance data, calving losses from the Northern Patagonia Icefield could be inferred, which doubled in 2000–2009 as compared to 1975–2000. The 21st century projection of future mass balance of the Northern Patagonia Icefield shows a strong increase in ablation from 2050 and a reduction of solid precipitation from 2080, both due to higher temperatures. The total mass loss in the 21st century is estimated to be 592±50 Gt with strongly increasing rates towards the end of the century. The prediction of the future mass balance of the Northern Patagonia Icefield includes several additional sources of errors due to uncertainties in the prediction of future climate and due to possible variations in ice dynamics, which might modify the geometry of the icefield and change the rate of mass losses due to calving.