Emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from a headwater stream network of interior Alaska
Article first published online: 11 APR 2013
©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Volume 118, Issue 2, pages 482–494, June 2013
How to Cite
2013), Emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from a headwater stream network of interior Alaska, J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci, 118, 482–494, doi:10.1002/jgrg.20034., , , , and (
- Issue published online: 9 JUL 2013
- Article first published online: 11 APR 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 15 FEB 2013 01:47PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 21 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Received: 7 JUN 2012
- carbon dioxide;
 Boreal ecosystems store significant quantities of organic carbon (C) that may be vulnerable to degradation as a result of a warming climate. Despite their limited coverage on the landscape, streams play a significant role in the processing, gaseous emission, and downstream export of C, and small streams are thought to be particularly important because of their close connection with the surrounding landscape. However, ecosystem carbon studies do not commonly incorporate the role of the aquatic conduit. We measured carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) concentrations and emissions in a headwater stream network of interior Alaska underlain by permafrost to assess the potential role of stream gas emissions in the regional carbon balance. First-order streams exhibited the greatest variability in fluxes of CO2 and CH4, and the greatest mean pCO2. High-resolution time series of stream pCO2 and discharge at two locations on one first-order stream showed opposing pCO2 responses to storm events, indicating the importance of hydrologic flowpaths connecting CO2-rich soils with surface waters. Repeated longitudinal surveys on the stream showed consistent areas of elevated pCO2 and pCH4, indicative of discrete hydrologic flowpaths delivering soil water and groundwater having varying chemistry. Up-scaled basin estimates of stream gas emissions suggest that streams may contribute significantly to catchment-wide CH4 emissions. Overall, our results indicate that while stream-specific gas emission rates are disproportionately high relative to the terrestrial landscape, both stream surface area and catchment normalized emission rates were lower than those documented for the Yukon River Basin as a whole. This may be due to limitations of C sources and/or C transport to surface waters.