All the authors lecture Economics/Finance at the University of Mauritius.
The net contribution of the Mauritian export processing zone using benefit–cost analysis
Article first published online: 6 OCT 2008
Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Journal of International Development
Volume 21, Issue 3, pages 379–392, April 2009
How to Cite
Sawkut, R., Vinesh, S. and Sooraj, F. (2009), The net contribution of the Mauritian export processing zone using benefit–cost analysis. J. Int. Dev., 21: 379–392. doi: 10.1002/jid.1489
- Issue published online: 26 MAR 2009
- Article first published online: 6 OCT 2008
- shadow prices;
- incentive systems
An EPZ is basically no more than a device whereby imports, to be used in the production of exports, can be acquired by manufacturers on a bonded duty-free basis. They are literally industrial zones with special incentives to attract foreign investors in which imported materials undergo some degree of processing before being exported again. The logic behind these zones was the creation of an area in which domestic policies do not hold and in which, therefore, a government could implement policies designed to enable individual firms to invest profitably on the basis of a country's comparative advantage. However, although there is significant literature on the impact of EPZs on host countries, nevertheless, the evidence has mainly been concerned with their benefits and costs and has stopped short of formal benefit-cost analysis. In essence, what the empirical studies have lacked, including those done on the Mauritius Export Processing Zone (MEPZ), has been an analytical framework within which the benefits and costs of EPZs can be identified conceptually and quantified empirically. In this respect, the objective of the current paper is to formally attempt to calculate the net contribution of the MEPZ using a modified version of the enclave model put forward by Warr (1988). The results show that although Mauritius has been able to attain its objective of reducing employment and raising foreign exchange through the creation of the EPZ, yet overall the EPZ has cost more to the economy than the benefits it has conferred to the economy. This is principally because of the incentives that were given to the producers working in the EPZ sector. The costs of these incentives were higher than the overall returns obtained from the sector. The two variables that negatively contributed to the sector were domestic borrowings and electricity usage. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.