Special Issue Article
Mineral resource abundance and regional growth in Spain, 1860–2000
Article first published online: 27 NOV 2008
DOI: 10.1002/jid.1515
Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-1328/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=fd413a4d60b54785477481c87152296ee1c95e79)
Journal of International Development
Special Issue: Historical Roots of Poverty (Mosley and Bowden)
Volume 20, Issue 8, pages 1122–1135, November 2008
Additional Information
How to Cite
Domenech, J. (2008), Mineral resource abundance and regional growth in Spain, 1860–2000. J. Int. Dev., 20: 1122–1135. doi: 10.1002/jid.1515
Publication History
- Issue published online: 27 NOV 2008
- Article first published online: 27 NOV 2008
Funded by
- Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Grant Number: SEJ2006-08188/ECON
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- resource curse;
- development;
- specialization;
- Spain
Abstract
The natural resource curse hypothesis predicts that natural resource windfalls can reduce the long run level of income per capita by crowding out manufacturing, slowing down the accumulation of human capital, damaging institutions and increasing inequality. This paper explores some of the central tenets of the natural resource curse literature by exploiting variation in mineral resources in Spain from 1860 to 1936. The conclusions of the paper are that, contrary to the natural resource curse hypothesis, natural resources had a positive, sizeable effect on industrialisation by 1920 and that they did not reduce real wage growth in the period 1860–1920. Moreover, extractive industries did not slow down the accumulation of human capital. When I look at the very long run by analysing real income per capita convergence from 1930 to 2000, there are no significant costs of early specialisation in extractive industries. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1328/asset/JID_left.gif?v=1&s=2818d3b089fa0daf3b7a7fa4f52314b778c44eda)
1099-1328/asset/JID_right.gif?v=1&s=1ff53e92336081b6ab028f85976ee49eb42ffb66)