Research Article
Constraints to expanding access to health interventions: an empirical analysis and country typology
Article first published online: 7 JAN 2003
DOI: 10.1002/jid.964
Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-1328/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=fd413a4d60b54785477481c87152296ee1c95e79)
Journal of International Development
Special Issue: Expanding Access to Health Interventions in Low and Middle-Income Countries: Constraints and Opportunities for Scaling-Up
Volume 15, Issue 1, pages 15–39, January 2003
Additional Information
How to Cite
Ranson, M. K., Hanson, K., Oliveira-Cruz, V. and Mills, A. (2003), Constraints to expanding access to health interventions: an empirical analysis and country typology. J. Int. Dev., 15: 15–39. doi: 10.1002/jid.964
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 JAN 2003
- Article first published online: 7 JAN 2003
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
This paper adopts three approaches to classifying countries by level of constraint, in order to inform the choice of strategies for expanding access to health interventions in different contexts. We find substantial heterogeneity across the 84 low-income and (all) sub-Saharan African countries analysed. Poor sub-Saharan African countries are the most highly constrained; Asian countries, in general, less constrained; and the two Asian giants, China and India, consistently fall above the median. Former Soviet Union countries rank low in terms of governance, but high for health systems variables. Only 10 per cent of the total population of the countries included lives in countries with the greatest constraints. The potential applications of the analysis are discussed, as are the limitations of the cross-sectional, macro level approach. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1328/asset/JID_left.gif?v=1&s=2818d3b089fa0daf3b7a7fa4f52314b778c44eda)
1099-1328/asset/JID_right.gif?v=1&s=1ff53e92336081b6ab028f85976ee49eb42ffb66)