Quantification of hepatic steatosis with MRI: The effects of accurate fat spectral modeling

Authors

  • Scott B. Reeder MD, PhD,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    2. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    4. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    • Department of Radiology, E3/311 CSC, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Philip M. Robson PhD,

    1. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Huanzhou Yu PhD,

    1. MR Applied Science Lab, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ann Shimakawa MSE,

    1. MR Applied Science Lab, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Catherine DG Hines MS,

    1. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Charles A. McKenzie PhD,

    1. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jean H. Brittain PhD

    1. MR Applied Science Lab, GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a chemical-shift–based imaging method for fat quantification that accounts for the complex spectrum of fat, and to compare this method with MR spectroscopy (MRS). Quantitative noninvasive biomarkers of hepatic steatosis are urgently needed for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Materials and Methods

Hepatic steatosis was measured with “fat-fraction” images in 31 patients using a multiecho chemical-shift–based water-fat separation method at 1.5T. Fat-fraction images were reconstructed using a conventional signal model that considers fat as a single peak at –210 Hz relative to water (“single peak” reconstruction). Fat-fraction images were also reconstructed from the same source images using two methods that account for the complex spectrum of fat; precalibrated and self-calibrated “multipeak” reconstruction. Single-voxel MRS that was coregistered with imaging was performed for comparison.

Results

Imaging and MRS demonstrated excellent correlation with single peak reconstruction (r2 = 0.91), precalibrated multipeak reconstruction (r2 = 0.94), and self-calibrated multipeak reconstruction (r2 = 0.91). However, precalibrated multipeak reconstruction demonstrated the best agreement with MRS, with a slope statistically equivalent to 1 (0.96 ± 0.04; P = 0.4), compared to self-calibrated multipeak reconstruction (0.83 ± 0.05, P = 0.001) and single-peak reconstruction (0.67 ± 0.04, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Accurate spectral modeling is necessary for accurate quantification of hepatic steatosis with MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:1332–1339. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) is an emerging cause of chronic liver disease, and is considered to be the hepatic manifestation of the “metabolic syndrome” (1–3), affecting 30% of adults and 10% of children in the United States (4–7). It is increasingly prevalent, paralleling the current epidemics of diabetes and obesity. The underlying cause of NAFLD, insulin resistance, leads to intracellular accumulation of triglycerides in hepatocytes (steatosis) (3, 8). An important subset of NAFLD is nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (9), which exhibits histologic markers of inflammation, fibrosis, and steatosis. Alarmingly, NAFLD afflicts children at an escalating rate, likely related to the widespread increase in childhood obesity and diabetes (4–7). NAFLD leads to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver failure in a large number of these children as they mature into young adults (4–7).

Nontargeted biopsy, the current gold standard for the detection of steatosis, suffers from tremendous sampling variability (10) because NAFLD is inherently heterogeneous. The underlying assumption that biopsy, which samples 1/50,000th of the liver, is representative of the entire organ, is being challenged. A recent study in 51 patients undergoing two closely localized biopsies angled 30° to 45° apart, demonstrated a κ-reliability score of 0.64 for grading steatosis, indicating poor agreement for reliable grading of NAFLD (11). Other studies have also shown similar sampling variability when more than one sample is analyzed (12–18).

The lack of a safe, inexpensive and noninvasive method for accurate identification and quantitative grading of NAFLD has been a major barrier to understanding its epidemiology and pathophysiology. Therefore, there has been recent interest in the development of noninvasive MRI methods for the detection and quantification of fatty liver (19–25). Unfortunately, the translation of these qualitative methods into quantitative methods for measuring hepatic fat content has been challenging, requiring correction and/or compensation for a variety of confounding factors, including: T1 bias (21, 25), noise bias (21), and the effects of T*2 (22, 25).

In addition, all chemical-shift MRI methods model the signal from fat as a single spectral peak at ∼3.3 ppm upfield from water (–210 Hz at 1.5T, –420 Hz at 3.0T). Unfortunately, fat contains multiple 1H peaks from the various chemical moieties of triglycerides, including olefinic groups with frequencies close to the water resonance (26). Figure 1 contains a single-voxel spectrum of fat from the adipose tissue of a normal volunteer, explicitly showing the multiple resonance peaks of fat. In this work, we demonstrate the importance of accurate spectral modeling for quantification of hepatic steatosis.

Figure 1.

Representative single-voxel PRESS proton spectrum acquired from the subcutaneous tissue of a normal volunteer at 1.5T, demonstrating six discrete spectral peaks of fat (*). Considerable signal from fat protons originate at peaks other than the main peak, explaining why chemical-shift–based water-fat separation methods that model fat as a single peak cannot achieve accurate separation of water and fat signals. These resonance peaks of fat correspond to frequencies of 47 Hz, –23 Hz, –117 Hz, –159 Hz, –210 Hz, and –236 Hz relative to water (arrow).

Accurate estimation of fatty liver with MRI requires an acquisition that is T1-independent, avoids noise-related bias, corrects for T*2, and accurately models the spectral complexity of fat. Although excellent correlation with gold standard measurements of fat can still be achieved if these factors are not considered (20, 27), the apparent fat concentration will not reflect the underlying biology (fat concentration). The apparent fat concentration will also be highly variable between scanners, because measurements will be dependent on specific imaging parameters and properties of the scanner, such as TR, TE, flip angle, number of echoes, echo spacing, field strength, etc. Widespread translation of an accurate fat quantification method should reflect the underlying biology and must be independent of scanning parameters and scanner properties, otherwise, its utility is greatly limited.

Steatosis represents the abnormal accumulation of intracellular triglycerides, which, unlike the lipid molecules bound in cellular membranes (cholesterols, sphingolipids, phospholipids, etc), are easily detected with conventional MRI and MR spectroscopy (MRS) techniques. Unlike MRI, MRS has been shown to correlate strongly with liver fat as measured by biopsy (28, 29), and MRS is considered by many as a noninvasive gold standard for quantifying hepatic fat. Unfortunately, MRS acquires signal from only a single, large voxel (8–10 cm3). However, the fact that MRS can quantify steatosis is highly motivating, because the underlying physics of MRS and MRI are the same. In this work we develop a chemical-shift water-fat separation method that improves the accuracy of hepatic steatosis quantification through accurate modeling of the multiple spectral peaks of fat and compare these “multipeak” chemical-shift water-fat separation methods with conventional single-peak methods and MRS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Our Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant study received approval from our institutional review board to scan both patients and volunteers. After obtaining informed consent, a total of 33 patients (1 normal volunteer, 11 with suspected steatosis, and 22 patients referred for MRI of the liver for unrelated reasons) were recruited for this prospective study. One patient was excluded due to very large body habitus, and a second patient due to a scan prescription error, which resulted in a gross misregistration between imaging and spectroscopy. Of the remaining 31 patients there were 15 men (average age = 48.9 ± 12 years, range = 23–68 years) and 16 women (average age = 49.0 ± 12 years, range = 21–71 years).

Imaging and Spectroscopy

All imaging and spectroscopy was performed on a 1.5T Signa HDx scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) using an eight-channel cardiac coil. Imaging was performed with a chemical-shift–based water-fat separation method known as iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation (IDEAL) (30–32), combined with a three-dimensional (3D) multiecho spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) acquisition using three flyback readout gradients (Fig. 2). Flyback gradients were used to avoid spatial misregistration of fat signal in the readout direction. When data are acquired with bipolar gradient waveforms, an artifact can result from the alternating chemical-shift direction (33).

Figure 2.

Schematic of the pulse sequence diagram of the three-echo SPGR IDEAL acquisition for fat-fraction measurement. The echo times (TE1, TE2, TE3) are carefully chosen to maximize the SNR performance of the acquisition for an effective signal averaging of 3.0 for all relative quantities of water and fat.

Echo times were carefully selected to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) performance of the water and fat estimation with an effective signal averaging of 3.0 for all fractions of water and fat (30–32). Echo times were chosen to achieve a relative phase between water and fat (assuming a single peak for fat at –210 Hz) such that the center echo was acquired in quadrature (π/2+πk; k = any integer) and the first and third echoes were acquired 2π/3 before and after the center echo, respectively. This combination of echo times achieves the best possible SNR performance for a single spectral peak model of fat (30, 32).

Complex images acquired at the optimized echo times were then processed with an online reconstruction algorithm that calculates separate water and fat images. Total reconstruction time for a 3D data set of fat-fraction images was approximately one to two minutes. After correcting the fat images for chemical-shift artifact in the readout direction (34) a fat-fraction image was calculated for each pixel,

equation image(1)

The use of a fat-fraction image is necessary to remove the effects of coil sensitivity and to provide a quantitative value for local fat content of the tissue. A magnitude discrimination method was used to avoid noise bias that occurs at low fat fractions, when calculating fat-fraction images from separated magnitude water and fat images (21). Finally, a small flip angle (5°) was used to minimize bias in fat-fraction estimates that are related to differences in T1 between water and fat (21, 25).

Most chemical-shift–based water-fat separation methods assume that water and fat can be modeled as single, narrow peaks, separated by a known chemical shift. In such a model, the complex signal from a voxel containing water (W) and fat (F) acquired at echo time tn (n = 1, …, N) can be written,

equation image(2)

where Δf is the chemical shift between water and fat (–210 Hz at 1.5T) and ψ is the local field inhomogeneity map (Hz). This is a nonlinear equation that can be solved in a variety of related methods (31, 35–37). After demodulation of the phase shifts caused by the field inhomogeneity map, estimates of water and fat are made using the matrix pseudoinverse multiplication to estimate water and fat in the least squares sense.

Modified signal models that accounts for multiple spectral peaks of different chemical species have been described for 13C chemical-shift imaging (38, 39), and this approach can be used for accurate spectral modeling of fat, accounting for signal from the multiple fat peaks (25, 40). For a species such as fat, that has multiple spectral peaks and relatively narrow nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) linewidth, the signal equation can be modeled as,

equation image(3)

where cn = ∑math image(rpemath image) is a complex term that is assumed to be known a priori, and is written for simplicity, with Δfp (p = 1, …, P) representing the frequencies of the P spectral peaks of fat, and rp representing the relative amplitudes of these peaks, both of which are assumed to be known. In addition, the relative amplitudes, rp, are normalized such that ∑math imagerp = 1 so that the estimated value for fat (F) reflects the total signal from fat protons. Note that Eq. [3] is analogous to Eq. [2], but with the simple phasor term replaced with a sum of weighted phasors (cn). With this modified signal model, the field map, and subsequently water and fat signals, are estimated in the usual manner. The frequencies of the multiple fat peaks are easily determined using a single-voxel NMR spectroscopic acquisition obtained as part of a calibration scan performed in a patient or volunteer from a separate examination. The frequencies of these peaks is relatively constant across different patients as well as different types of fat (26, 28, 41).

The relative amplitudes of the multiple spectral peaks can be determined using two approaches: 1) precalibration, where the relative amplitudes of the spectral peaks are measured from a 16-echo scan by fitting the signals to the six most prominent spectral peaks of fat, including correction for T*2; or 2) self-calibration, where the relative amplitudes of the three largest fat peaks (–210 Hz, –159 Hz, 47 Hz at 1.5T) are measured directly from the source data (40). Representative values for the relative amplitudes of fat peaks measured with the precalibrated and self-calibrated approaches were recently reported by Yu et al (40). Self-calibration approaches are attractive because they avoid concerns about variations in the relative amplitudes of the spectral peaks of fat for different tissues, as well as concerns over relative T1 and T*2 weighting in the various spectral peaks when using different acquisition parameters.

Two self-calibration approaches can be used. A three-peak self-calibration method can be used for three-echo acquisitions, and models only the three largest spectral peaks of fat in the signal model, and requires the acquisition of only three images at different echo times (40). A second self-calibration method estimates the relative amplitudes of the six largest fat peaks and requires the acquisition of at least six images at different echo times (40). In this work, we will use the three-peak self-calibration method acquiring three images at different echo times.

It is important to realize that the three IDEAL reconstruction methods (single peak, precalibrated multipeak, and self-calibrated multipeak) can all be performed using the same set of complex images. This has the advantage of direct comparison of the different methods using the same underlying source data. In this work, we compare the precalibrated and three-peak self-calibrated reconstruction with single peak (conventional) IDEAL to determine the importance of accurate spectral modeling for quantification of fat.

Image acquisition parameters for IDEAL included: three echoes per TR, TR = 7.4 msec, TE = 2.0 msec/3.6 msec/5.2 msec, bandwidth [BW] = ± 143 kHz, field of view [FOV]x = 35 cm, FOVy = 27–35 cm, slice = 8–10 mm, matrix size = 224–256 × 160–192, slices = 18–22, scan time = 18–22 seconds, acquired during a breathhold. IDEAL fat-fraction images were reconstructed with the single-peak model, and then using the two multipeak methods (precalibrated and self-calibrated). Figure 3 contains an example of a multiecho IDEAL-SPGR data set acquired in a normal volunteer, showing the separated water and fat images, and the subsequent fat-fraction image, calculated according to Eq. [1] for each image pixel.

Figure 3.

Separated water, fat, and calculated fat-fraction image acquired in a healthy volunteer acquired with the multiecho acquisition in Fig. 2 and reconstructed with the conventional single-peak IDEAL reconstruction, demonstrating how separated water and fat images are used to construct a fat-fraction image.

For comparison with IDEAL, a single-voxel breathheld spectroscopic acquisition was performed using point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) (42), without water suppression to measure a localized hepatic fat-fraction. A 2.0-cm to 2.5-cm cubic volume (8.0–15.6 cm3) was selected, usually in the posterior segment of the right lobe of the liver in a location free from large vessels. Acquisition parameters for PRESS included: TR/TE = 2500 msec/25 msec, BW = ± 2500 Hz, averages = 4, readout points = 2048, total scan time = 20 seconds during a single breathhold.

Data Analysis

Raw spectroscopy data were postprocessed (blinded to IDEAL results) using in-house analysis software (MATLAB v7.4.0; The Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) written to estimate the proton density from the area under the absorption spectrum of zeroth-order phase-corrected spectral data. Total areas under the water peak (including the small fat peaks at 47 Hz and –23 Hz from the water resonance) and the fat group were measured and the fat fraction calculated from the area under the fat group divided by the sum of water and fat groups (43). In addition, fat-fraction measurements were made from all three reconstructed IDEAL reconstruction methods (single-peak, multipeak precalibrated, and multipeak self-calibrated) using a square 2.0–2.5 cm2 region-of-interest (ROI) chosen to match the location of the PRESS voxel and to avoid large vessels. The ROI size was 164 to 334 pixels depending on the PRESS voxel size and image spatial resolution. Linear regression analysis between fat-fraction measurements from IDEAL and PRESS was performed for both conventional and multipeak IDEAL reconstruction methods using Excel (v11.3.5; Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Perfect agreement between IDEAL and PRESS would yield a slope of 1.0 and intercept of 0.0, and linear regression was also used to test whether the slope and intercept were significantly different from these expected values. Only authors who were not employees of GE Healthcare had control of data and information that might have presented a conflict of interest.

RESULTS

Figure 4 shows representative IDEAL fat-fraction images acquired in two patients with steatosis. Shown for comparison is the PRESS spectrum from the segment of the right lobe of the liver, demonstrating good agreement with IDEAL, when the two multipeak reconstruction methods were used. In addition, the PRESS spectrum demonstrates the presence of multiple fat peaks (denoted with asterisks). Figure 4a also explicitly demonstrates the utility of imaging to characterize heterogeneity of steatosis, such as fatty sparing in segment 4, near the gallbladder fossa (arrow).

Figure 4.

Examples of IDEAL fat-fraction images (reconstructed using the precalibrated multipeak algorithm) and the corresponding PRESS acquisition, in two patients with (a) severe steatosis and (b) mild steatosis. The squares shown on the fat-fraction images correspond to the location of the PRESS single-voxel acquisition, and the asterisks are shown in the severe steatosis PRESS spectrum to explicitly denote the multiple peaks of fat. The agreement between IDEAL and PRESS improves when using the multipeak reconstruction methods compared to the conventional single-peak reconstruction. Note the fatty sparing near the gall bladder fossa in segment 4 (arrow).

Figure 5 plots the fat-fraction measurements from both IDEAL and PRESS in all 31 patients, for both conventional (single-peak) IDEAL and both multipeak IDEAL reconstruction methods. Error bars on IDEAL fat-fraction measurements are based on the standard error from the ROI measurement, while the error bars on the PRESS fat-fraction measurements were estimated at approximately 5% (0.05) based on the variance in the fat fraction observed when manually adjusting the phasing of the spectral data. Table 1 summarizes the correlation coefficients, as well as the slopes and intercepts of the linear fitting and their statistical significance relative to the expected values of the slope (1.0) and intercept (0.0).

Figure 5.

IDEAL fat-fraction plotted against PRESS fat-fraction using (a) conventional single-peak (SP) reconstruction; (b) multipeak reconstruction with precalibration; and (c) multipeak reconstruction with three-point self-calibration. All IDEAL reconstruction methods show excellent correlation with spectroscopy (Table 1); however, the conventional IDEAL reconstruction underestimates the amount of fat, while both multipeak reconstructions demonstrate close agreement with spectroscopy. The dashed line represents the line of unity.

Table 1. Summary of Linear Regression Results From IDEAL and PRESS Data*
 r2SlopeIntercept
  • *

    Comparison of the three IDEAL reconstruction methods with PRESS; all three methods are highly correlated with PRESS, although precalibrated MP-IDEAL shows the best overall agreement, with a slope closest to 1.

  • a

    No statistically significant difference between the expected value of the slope (1.0) or intercept (0.0).

  • MP = multipeak, SP = single-peak.

SP-IDEAL vs. PRESS0.910.67 ± 0.04, P < 0.0011.02 ± 0.65%, P = 0.13a
Precalibrated MP-IDEAL vs. PRESS0.940.96 ± 0.04, P = 0.4a1.52 ± 0.71%, P = 0.04
Self-calibrated MP-IDEAL vs. PRESS0.910.83 ± 0.05, P = 0.0011.76 ± 0.76%, P = 0.03

In all three cases, the IDEAL fat-fraction estimates and PRESS fat-fraction were highly correlated. For the precalibrated multipeak (MP)-IDEAL reconstruction, the slope was not significantly different from 1.0 (0.96 ± 0.04; P = 0.40), although there was a marginally significant bias at lower fat-fraction values with an intercept of 1.52 ± 0.71% (P = 0.04). For self-calibrated MP-IDEAL, both the slope (0.83 ± 0.05; P < 0.001) and intercept (1.76 ± 0.76%; P = 0.03) were statistically different than the expected values of 1.0 and 0.0, respectively. Although the intercepts for both multipeak reconstruction methods were close to zero, they were slightly larger than zero with moderate statistical significance. This implies that there is a small but statistically significant bias when measuring fat at low fat-fraction using the three-echo IDEAL reconstruction method used in this work.

DISCUSSION

In this work, we have demonstrated a high degree of correlation between IDEAL fat-fraction measurements and spectroscopy for the quantification of hepatic steatosis in patients with fatty infiltration of the liver. In addition, we have demonstrated the importance of accurate spectral modeling of fat, by modifying the IDEAL signal model to include multiple peaks of fat. Using either a precalibrated or self-calibrated multipeak reconstruction method, excellent correlation between IDEAL and PRESS was observed, with a slope close to one, particularly for the precalibrated approach. Although the slope of the self-calibrated method improved performance, statistically it was significantly <1.0, indicating that the precalibration method provided superior agreement with PRESS than the three-point self-calibrated reconstruction. If one accepts MRS as a noninvasive gold standard, this work suggests that IDEAL fat-fraction imaging using precalibrated multipeak reconstruction can also provide accurate quantitative estimates of hepatic steatosis while offering complete volumetric assessment of the liver, which PRESS cannot offer.

It is necessary to remove potential sources of bias when developing quantitative biomarkers that attempts to measure hepatic steatosis, in a manner that is independent of specific imaging parameters. We have utilized approaches to avoid T1-related, as well as noise bias for low fat-fractions (21). In this work, we demonstrated the importance of accurate spectral modeling with multipeak reconstruction; however, we have ignored the effects of T*2 that can cause errors in the estimates of fat-fraction, particularly for short values of T*2. Shortened values of T*2 can occur in patients with iron overload, which is common in patients with NAFLD (44, 45). Recently, a modified IDEAL algorithm that incorporates T*2 into the IDEAL signal model in order to provide fat-fraction estimates corrected for the effects of T*2 was described (22). This work demonstrated the need to acquire at least six echoes for optimal separation of water and fat signals with T*2 correction, therefore, we did not include the effects of T*2 in the fat-fraction measurements in this study. However, future work will explore the use of six (or more) echo acquisitions that allow correction for the effects of both T*2 and the multiple spectral peaks of fat. Another publication has recently described related methods for avoiding the effects of T*2 with a different multiecho water-fat separation method (25). In our study, care was taken to avoid patients with known iron overload based on clinical history, serum laboratory values, and standard imaging sequences (T2-weighted imaging), although no such patients were encountered during recruitment. However, we hypothesize that the effects of T*2 were responsible for the very small, but statistically significant bias that occurred at low fat-fractions.

For the PRESS measurements, we reduced T1-related bias in the fat-fraction measurements by choosing a TR (2500 msec) about four to five times that of liver T1 (46). Even though we minimized T2 effects by using the shortest possible TE (25 msec), some T2-related bias from PRESS was unavoidable, because the T2 of liver is ∼50 msec (46). PRESS fat-fraction measurements were also biased slightly by the inclusion of the small fat peaks at 47 Hz and –23 Hz with the water peak measurement. This was unavoidable because the linewidth of a spectrum acquired in such a large voxel caused the water peak to engulf these small peaks, particularly at low fat-fractions. The relative total amplitude of these peaks are 0.14 (40), introducing a small degree of error. All other peaks of fat, however, were included in the fat signal measurement made from the PRESS spectra. Finally, noise bias is not a source of error when measuring fat-fraction from a phase-corrected real spectrum.

In this work, the multiecho reconstruction relied on the a priori knowledge of the resonance frequencies of the various fat peaks. There are several implicit assumptions made when considering multiple spectral peaks. The spectrum that is observed with the PRESS sequence primarily comes from triglycerides in the tissue, and we have assumed that that fat spectrum measured from subcutaneous tissue is representative of fat in a steatotic liver. Although there are likely to be small differences between the spectral characteristics of triglycerides in different regions of the body, the gross characteristics of these spectra are very similar and differences between them are likely to have minimal impact on fat-fraction measurements. For example, a 20% error in a peak with relative amplitude of 0.1, would result, at most, in an absolute fat-fraction error of 2% in a liver with 20% fat.

Although our results indicate a significant difference between the single-peak and multipeak methods, there was no significant difference between the two multipeak approaches. Regardless of small potential differences between the precalibration spectrum used for the multipeak reconstruction and the true spectrum, this approach is certainly far more accurate than modeling fat as a signal discrete peak at –210 Hz.

The superior performance of the precalibrated spectral modeling approach compared to the self-calibrated approach is likely due to the fact that the self-calibrated method only considered the largest three echoes (40). The self-calibrated method uses the different echoes to estimate the relative amplitudes of the fat peaks as independent chemical species. Therefore, an inherent limitation of the self-calibrated approach is that it can only estimate the relative amplitudes of as many peaks as there are echoes, which in this case is three. Thus, the self-calibrated approach likely does not provide as accurate spectral modeling as the precalibrated approach. In acquisitions that perform T*2 correction, at least six echoes are acquired (25, 40). In this situation, all six of the fat peaks can be modeled in the self-calibrated approach. Therefore, further investigation into the self-calibrated approach, in comparison to the precalibrated method are warranted as part of additional studies that acquire larger numbers of echoes.

The echo times used in this study were based on the echo combination known to maximize SNR performance when fat is modeled as a single peak (30, 32). However, the inclusion of multiple peaks of fat into the signal model will alter this SNR performance slightly and a different combination of echo times may provide better SNR. We expect this effect to be small, because the –210 Hz fat peak remains dominant. Fortunately, IDEAL can decompose water and fat signals over a wider range of echo times and small changes result in only slightly degraded SNR performance, without bias or other errors. Future work will perform a Cramér-Rao bound analysis to account for the multiple peaks of fat, to determine the maximum possible SNR performance and the combination of echoes needed to achieve this upper limit.

Another implicit assumption that was made in this work, as well as by others using MRI fat-fraction as a measure of steatosis, is that the water content of the liver is unaltered by other processes such as inflammation and fibrosis. For example, it is conceivable that as fibrosis progresses, the additional extracellular matrix laid down by hepatic astrocytes could reduce the amount of free water in the liver. This would alter the apparent fat-fraction by reducing the amount of water signal in Eq. [1]. We anticipate that this effect, if it occurs, would happen at later stages of fibrosis when detection and quantification of steatosis may be less clinically relevant. The effect of water content on fat-fraction measurements remains unknown and should be investigated in future studies.

Conclusive validation of fat-fraction measurements with MRI requires correlation with liver biopsy, although imaging-biopsy correlation is logistically more difficult. As discussed above, biopsy suffers from tremendous variability, and raises concerns about its use as a reliable gold standard. We believe that the imaging-spectroscopy correlation performed in this study demonstrates a very promising initial step toward the development and in vivo validation of quantitative biomarkers of hepatic steatosis. Future studies will investigate imaging-biopsy correlation for further validation of these new imaging methods.

Acknowledgements

S.B.R. was supported by a Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Scholar Award.

Ancillary