SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • coil performance;
  • SENSE;
  • SNR;
  • g-factor;
  • breast magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate three multicoil breast arrays for both conventional and SENSE-accelerated imaging.

Materials and Methods:

Two commercially available 8-element coils and a prototype 16-element coil were compared. One 8-element array had adjustable coils located next to the breast tissue and the other had a fixed coil arrangement; both were designed to allow parallel imaging in the left–right direction. The 16-element coil was designed to have coil sensitivity variation in both the left–right and superior–inferior directions, and also had adjustable coils. Their performance was assessed in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), g-factor, and uniformity with a custom-built phantom.

Results:

The 16-element array with adjustable coils provided the highest SNR, while the 8-element coil with a fixed coil arrangement had the best uniformity. All coils performed well for SENSE acceleration in the left–right direction. The 8-element coils did not have the capability for acceleration in the superior–inferior direction across the whole volume. The 16-element coil enabled acceleration in the superior–inferior direction in addition to the left–right direction.

Conclusion:

Smaller, adjustable coil elements located next to breast tissue can provide greater SNR than larger, fixed coil elements. A multicoil breast array with high intrinsic SNR and low g-factors enables high-quality parallel imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010; 31: 328–338. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.