Original Research
Visualization of deep veins and detection of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with balanced turbo field echo (b-TFE) and contrast-enhanced T1 fast field echo (CE-FFE) using a blood pool agent (BPA)
Article first published online: 23 JAN 2010
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22046
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Enden, T., Storås, T. H., Negård, A., Haig, Y., Sandvik, L., Gjesdal, K.-I., Sandset, P. M. and Kløw, N.-E. (2010), Visualization of deep veins and detection of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with balanced turbo field echo (b-TFE) and contrast-enhanced T1 fast field echo (CE-FFE) using a blood pool agent (BPA). J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 31: 416–424. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22046
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 JAN 2010
- Article first published online: 23 JAN 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 2 NOV 2009
- Manuscript Received: 12 SEP 2008
Funded by
- Norwegian Research Council
- University of Oslo and Medical Service Division
- Oslo University Hospital, Ulleval, Oslo. Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- venous thrombosis;
- veins;
- magnetic resonance imaging;
- contrast agents;
- blood pool agents
Abstract
Purpose:
To assess image quality, vessel visualization, preliminary diagnostic properties, and interobserver variability of a novel balanced turbo field echo (b-TFE) sequence and contrast-enhanced T1 fast field echo (CE-FFE) sequence with blood pool agent (BPA).
Materials and Methods:
A total of 15 healthy volunteers and six patients with ultrasound-verified proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were examined from the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the proximal calf veins.
Results:
The great majority of deep veins were completely visualized on both sequences. In healthy volunteers the IVC was completely visualized in five b-TFE and 11 CE-FFE scans, and partially in seven b-TFE and four CE-FFE scans (P = 0.008). Poorest image quality was in the pelvis. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was higher on b-TFE compared to CE-FFE, with significant difference in calf images (P = 0.036). Sensitivity was 100% for proximal DVT with both methods. Specificity was 70% (CE-FFE) and 80% (b-TFE) for proximal femoral DVT; 100% in distal femoral. Interobserver reliability was kappa 1.0 (b-TFE), 0.9 (CE-FFE) for proximal, and overall poor for distal DVT.
Conclusion:
Contrast-enhancement did not add valuable information in visualizing deep veins of the lower limbs compared to b-TFE, though the IVC was slightly better visualized. Diagnostic properties and interobserver reliability of both sequences were good for proximal DVT and poor for distal DVT. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010; 31: 416–424. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1522-2586/asset/JMRI_left.gif?v=1&s=b7fad2e13b2fe41d8e616be0fde3492c7a0033f8)
1522-2586/asset/JMRI_right.gif?v=1&s=62cf6203f6392175649e5bce75bc388c750f03e8)
