SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Lee SY, Ko GY, Gwon DI, et al. Living donor liver transplantation: complications in donors and interventional management. Radiology 2004; 230: 443449.
  • 2
    An SK, Lee JM, Suh KS, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI as the sole preoperative imaging technique: a prospective study of living liver donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 12231233.
  • 3
    Marsh JW, Gray E, Ness R, Starzl TE. Complications of right lobe living donor liver transplantation. J Hepatol 2009; 51: 715724.
  • 4
    Caiado AH, Blasbalg R, Marcelino AS, et al. Complications of liver transplantation: multimodality imaging approach. Radiographics 2007; 27: 14011417.
  • 5
    Franco J. Biliary complications in liver transplant recipients. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2005; 7: 160164.
  • 6
    Brown RS Jr, Russo MW, Lai M, et al. A survey of liver transplantation from living adult donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 818825.
  • 7
    Tung BY, Kimmey MB. Biliary complications of orthotopic liver transplantation. Dig Dis 1999; 17: 133144.
  • 8
    Schroeder T, Radtke A, Kuehl H, Debatin JF, Malago M, Ruehm SG. Evaluation of living liver donors with an all-inclusive 3D multi-detector row CT protocol. Radiology 2006; 238: 900910.
  • 9
    Kamel IR, Kruskal JB, Keogan MT, Goldberg SN, Warmbrand G, Raptopoulos V. Multidetector CT of potential right-lobe liver donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 645651.
  • 10
    Kamel IR, Kruskal JB, Pomfret EA, Keogan MT, Warmbrand G, Raptopoulos V. Impact of multidetector CT on donor selection and surgical planning before living adult right lobe liver transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 193200.
  • 11
    Ott DJ, Gelfand DW. Complications of gastrointestinal radiologic procedures: II. Complications related to biliary tract studies. Gastrointest Radiol 1981; 6: 4756.
  • 12
    Rholl KS, Smathers RL, McClennan BL, Lee JK. Intravenous cholangiography in the CT era. Gastrointest Radiol 1985; 10: 6974.
  • 13
    Lee VS, Morgan GR, Teperman LW, et al. MR imaging as the sole preoperative imaging modality for right hepatectomy: a prospective study of living adult-to-adult liver donor candidates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 14751482.
  • 14
    Carr JC, Nemcek AA Jr, Abecassis M, et al. Preoperative evaluation of the entire hepatic vasculature in living liver donors with use of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and true fast imaging with steady-state precession. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14: 441449.
  • 15
    Lee MW, Lee JM, Lee JY, et al. Preoperative evaluation of the hepatic vascular anatomy in living liver donors: comparison of CT angiography and MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 10811087.
  • 16
    Willmann JK, Gopfert K, Lutz AM, et al. Prospective intraindividual comparison between respiratory-triggered balanced steady-state free precession and breath-hold gradient-echo and time-of-flight magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of portal and hepatic veins. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 229240.
  • 17
    Lee VS, Krinsky GA, Nazzaro CA, et al. Defining intrahepatic biliary anatomy in living liver transplant donor candidates at mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography versus conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography. Radiology 2004; 233: 659666.
  • 18
    Lim JS, Kim MJ, Kim JH, et al. Preoperative MRI of potential living-donor-related liver transplantation using a single dose of gadobenate dimeglumine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 424431.
  • 19
    Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A, et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 195: 785792.
  • 20
    Spinazzi A, Lorusso V, Pirovano G, Kirchin M. Safety, tolerance, biodistribution, and MR imaging enhancement of the liver with gadobenate dimeglumine: results of clinical pharmacologic and pilot imaging studies in nonpatient and patient volunteers. Acad Radiol 1999; 6: 282291.
  • 21
    Vogl TJ, Pegios W, McMahon C, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine—a new contrast agent for MR imaging: preliminary evaluation in healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 887892.
  • 22
    Atri M, Bret PM, Fraser-Hill MA. Intrahepatic portal venous variations: prevalence with US. Radiology 1992; 184: 157158.
  • 23
    Macdonald DB, Haider MA, Khalili K, et al. Relationship between vascular and biliary anatomy in living liver donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 247252.
  • 24
    Choi JW, Kim TK, Kim KW, et al. Anatomic variation in intrahepatic bile ducts: an analysis of intraoperative cholangiograms in 300 consecutive donors for living donor liver transplantation. Korean J Radiol 2003; 4: 8590.
  • 25
    Erbay N, Raptopoulos V, Pomfret EA, Kamel IR, Kruskal JB. Living donor liver transplantation in adults: vascular variants important in surgical planning for donors and recipients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 109114.
  • 26
    Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann HJ. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 715724.
  • 27
    Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W. Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 559578.
  • 28
    Runge VM. A comparison of two MR hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates: Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22: 643650.
  • 29
    Lim JS, Kim MJ, Myoung S, et al. MR cholangiography for evaluation of hilar branching anatomy in transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 537545.