SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adams, J., & Hancock, T. (2000). Work experience as a predictor of MBA performance. College Student Journal, 34(2), 211216.
  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 1740.
  • Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. (2000). Compose teams to assure successful boundary activity. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 199201). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2005). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 941961.
  • Barley, S. R. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 61103.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99129.
  • Boland, R. J., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350372.
  • Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 20, pp. 227261). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  • Borgatti, S., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892895.
  • Brass, D. J. (2012). A social network perspective on organizational psychology. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 667695). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsui, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795819.
  • Bunderson, J. S., & Reagans, R. E. (2011). Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 22(5), 11821194.
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. The American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349399.
  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128152.
  • Cohen, B., & Zhou, X. (1991). Status processes in permanent work groups. American Sociological Review, 56, 179188.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95120.
  • Dahlin, K. B., Weingart, L. R., & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 11071123.
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350383.
  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 122.
  • Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443475.
  • Franz, T., & Larson, J. (2002). The impact of experts on information sharing during group discussion. Small Group Research, 33, 383411.
  • Galunic, C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombination in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 11931201.
  • Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451495.
  • Gino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 102115.
  • Gropper, D. M. (2007). Does the GMAT matter for executive MBA students? Some empirical evidence. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(2), 206216.
  • Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, and disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 11991228.
  • Hirschfeld, R. R., Field, H. S., Giles, W. F., Armenakis, A. A., & Jordan, M. H. (2006). Becoming team players: Team members' mastery of teamwork knowledge as a predictor of team task proficiency and observed teamwork effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 487474.
  • Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1328.
  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23, 193219.
  • Hsu, J. S. C., Chang, J. Y. T., Klein, G., & Jiang, J. J. (2011). Exploring the impact of team mental models on information utilization and project performance in system development. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 112.
  • Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801830.
  • Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001). Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: The importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research Policy, 30, 791804.
  • Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. In J. P. Walsh, & A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of Management Annuals (Vol. 4, pp. 317357). London: Routledge.
  • van Knippenber, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515541.
  • Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325340.
  • Lim, B. C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403418.
  • Marrone, J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36(4), 911940.
  • Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 3756.
  • Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273283.
  • Mehra, A., Kilduff, M. K., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 121146.
  • Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535546.
  • Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89106.
  • Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852863.
  • Nerkar, A., & Paruchuri, S. (2005). Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science, 51(5), 771785.
  • Newell, S., Tansley, C., & Huang, J. (2004). Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: The importance of bridging and bonding. British Journal of Management, 15, 4357.
  • Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100130.
  • Oh, H., Chung, M., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860875.
  • Oh, H., Labianca, G., & Chung, M. H. (2006). A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review, 31, 569582.
  • Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 85101.
  • Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 609623.
  • Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 235257.
  • Plucker, J., & Markel, M. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds). The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 5172). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879903.
  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185227.
  • Rachel, S. L., Erika, F. N., Kahn, P., Jr., Peter, H., & Batya, F. (2005). Creativity tasks and coding system—Used in the plasma display window study. Information School Technical Report Repository, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Ratcheva, V. (2009). Integrating diverse knowledge through boundary spanning processes—The case of multidisciplinary project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 206215.
  • Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240267.
  • Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 101133.
  • Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., & Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88, 313338.
  • Shin, J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 17091721.
  • Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315330.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of inter-group relations (2nd edn, pp. 724). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
  • Tortoriello, M., & Krackhardt, D. (2010). Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 167181.
  • Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Zhou, J., Shin, J., Brass, D., Choi, J., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 15441552.