Special Issue Article
Comparison of satellite-derived TOA shortwave clear-sky fluxes to estimates from GCM simulations constrained by satellite observations of land surface characteristics
Article first published online: 25 MAR 2010
DOI: 10.1002/joc.2107
Copyright © 2010 Royal Meteorological Society
Issue

International Journal of Climatology
Special Issue: Impacts of land use change on climate
Volume 30, Issue 13, pages 2088–2104, 15 November 2010
Additional Information
How to Cite
Anantharaj, V. G., Nair, U. S., Lawrence, P., Chase, T. N., Christopher, S. and Jones, T. (2010), Comparison of satellite-derived TOA shortwave clear-sky fluxes to estimates from GCM simulations constrained by satellite observations of land surface characteristics. Int. J. Climatol., 30: 2088–2104. doi: 10.1002/joc.2107
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 MAR 2010
- Article first published online: 25 MAR 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 12 JAN 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 30 DEC 2009
- Manuscript Received: 1 DEC 2008
Funded by
- National Aeronautic and Space Administration via. Grant Number: NNS06AA58G
- NOAA Office of Atmospheric Research Laboratories and Cooperative Institutes via. Grant Number: NA06OAR4600181
- National Science Foundation via. Grant Numbers: NSF ATM0437583, NSF 06398382
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- radiation energy budget;
- shortwave fluxes;
- global circulation model;
- CERES;
- MODIS land surface albedo;
- ocean albedo;
- vegetation albedo
Abstract
Clear-sky, upwelling shortwave flux at the top of the atmosphere
, simulated using the atmospheric and land model components of the Community Climate System Model 3 (CCSM3), is compared to corresponding observational estimates from the Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) sensor. Improvements resulting from the use of land surface albedo derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) to constrain the simulations are also examined. Compared to CERES observations, CCSM3 overestimates global, annual averaged
over both land and oceans. However, regionally, CCSM3 overestimates
over some land and ocean areas while underestimating it over other sites. CCSM3 underestimates
over the Saharan and Arabian Deserts and substantial differences exist between CERES observations and CCSM3 over agricultural areas. Over selected sites, after using ground-based observations to remove systematic biases that exist in CCSM computation of
, it is found that use of MODIS albedo improves the simulation of
. Inability of coarse resolution CCSM3 simulation to resolve spatial heterogeneity of snowfall over high altitude sites such as the Tibetan Plateau causes overestimation of
in these areas. Discrepancies also exist in the simulation of
over ocean areas as CCSM3 does not account for the effect of wind speed on ocean surface albedo. This study shows that the radiative energy budget at the TOA is improved through the use of MODIS albedo in Global Climate Models. Copyright © 2010 Royal Meteorological Society
1097-0088/asset/JOC_centre.gif?v=1&s=392766b4fccfb001371ef9b7a825690a48ffca93)
1097-0088/asset/JOC_right.gif?v=1&s=0dac9618b2b4992612d732ba56fc6b92cb55979a)