SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Atkinson GD, Holiday CR. 1977. Tropical cyclone minimum sea level pressure maximum sustained wind relationship for western North Pacific. Monthly Weather Review 105: 421427.
  • Anthes RA. 1982. Tropical cyclones: Their evolution structure and effects. American Meteorological Society 19: 208.
  • Bao S, Xie L, Pietrafesa JL. 2004. An asymmetric hurricane wind model for storm surge and wave forecasting. 27th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology.Monterey, CA.
  • CFHC. 2008. Central Florida Hurricane Center. http://flhurricane.com/cyclone/stormlist.php. accessed in December 2008.
  • Chan HF, Walker GO. 1979. Empirical studies of the peak surge due to tropical storms at Hong Kong. Journal of the Oceanographical Society of Japan 35: 110117.
  • Conner WC, Kraft RH, Harris DL. 1957. Empirical methods for forecasting the maximum storm tide due to hurricanes and other tropical storms. Monthly Weather Review 4(85): 113116.
  • Depperman CE. 1947. Notes on the origin and structure of Philippine Typhoons. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society 28: 399404.
  • Flather R. 1994. A storm surge prediction model for the northern bay of Bengal with application to cyclone disaster in April 1991. Journal of Physical Oceanography 24: 172190.
  • Gorokhovich Y, Doocys S. 2008. Cyclone Nargis: 3.2 million Burmese affected limited humanitarian assistance poses health threat as condition worsen. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Press release.
  • Holland GJ. 1980. An analytic model of wind and pressure profile in hurricanes. Monthly Weather Review 108: 12121218.
  • Hossain SMN, Sing A. 2003. Application of GIS for assessing human vulnerability to cyclone in India. Technical note.
  • Hoover RA. 1957. Empirical relationships of the central pressures in hurricanes to the maximum surge and storm tide. Monthly Weather Review 5 85: 167174.
  • Houston SH, Shaffer WA, Powell MD, Chen J. 1999. Comparisons of HRD and SLOSH surface wind fields in hurricanes: Implications for storm surge modeling. Weather and Forecasting 14(5): 671686.
  • Hsu SA, Babin A. 2005. Estimating the radius of maximum winds via satellite during hurricane Lili (2002) over the Gulf of Mexico. NWA Electronic Journal of Operational Meteorology 2005-EJ3. http://www.nwas.org/ej/2005/2005.php.
  • Huang WP, Hsu CA, Kung CS, Yim JZ. 2007. Numerical studies on typhoon surges in the Northern Taiwan. Coastal Engineering 54: 883894.
  • Jain I, Chittibabu P, Agnihotri N, Dube SK, Sinha PC, Rao AD. 2006. Simulation of storm surges along Myanmar Coast using a location specific numerical models. Natural Hazards 39: 7182.
  • Jan CD, Tseng CM, Wang JS, Cheng YH. 2006. Empirical relation between the typhoon surge deviation and the corresponding typhoon characteristics; a case study in Taiwan. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 11: 193200.
  • Jelensnianski CP. 1972. Special program to list amplitudes of surges from hurricanes. I Landfall storms NOAA Technical Memorandum. NWS TDL-46.
  • Joseph PV. 1994. Tropical cyclone hazards and warning and disaster mitigation system in India. Sadhana 4(119): 551556.
  • Katz R, Murphy A. 1997. Economic value of weather and climate forecasting. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  • Kumar VS, Mandal S, Kumar KA. 2003. Estimation of wind speed and wave height during cyclones. Ocean Engineering 30: 22392253.
  • Lee TL. 2006. Neural network prediction of a storm surge. Ocean Engineering 33: 483494.
  • Madsen H, Jakobsen F. 2004. Cyclone induced storm surge and flood forecasting in the northern Bay of Bengal. Coastal Engineering 51: 277296.
  • Natarajan R, Ramamurthy KM. 1995. Estimation of central pressure of cyclonic storms in the Indian seas. Indian Journal of Meteorology, Hydrology and Geophysics 26: 6566.
  • NDBC. 2008. National Data Buoy Center—National Weather Service NOOA. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/hmd.shtml. Accessed in December 2008.
  • NHC. 2008. National Weather Service—National Hurricane Center NOOA. http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane. Accessed in November 2008.
  • Pore NA. 1964. The relation of wind and pressure to extra tropical storm surges at Atlantic City. Journal of Applied Meteorology 2(3): 155163.
  • Puotinen ML. 2007. Modeling the risk of cyclone wave damage to coral reefs using GIS: a case study of the Great Barrier Reef 1969-2003. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21–1: 97120.
  • Russo EP. 1998. Estimating hurricane storm surge amplitudes for the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coastlines of The United States. OCEANS '98 Conference Proceedings 3: 13011305.
  • SEDAC. 2008. CIESIN socioeconomic data and application center. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/global.jsp. Accessed in January 2009.
  • Shapiro L. 1983. The asymmetric boundary layer flow under a translating hurricane. Journal of Atmospheric Science 40(8): 19841998.
  • Tancreto AE. 1958. A method for forecasting the maximum surge at Boston due to extra tropical storms. Monthly Weather Review 6(86): 197200.
  • TCG. 2008. Post Nargis recovery and preparedness plan Dec-2008. Tripartite Core Group: The Government of the Union of Myanmar. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations and United Nations.
  • USACE. 1984. Shore protection manual. United States Army Corps of Engineers Mississippi 3: 8184.
  • Vatvani DK, Gerritsen H, Stelling GS, Rao K. 2002. Cyclone induced storm surge and flood forecasting system for India. Proceedings of the 2002 Coastal Disasters Conference. San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Webster TL, Forbes DL, Dickie S, Shreenan R. 2004. Using topographic lidar to map flood risk from storm-surge events for Charlottetown. Prince Edward Island Canada. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 1(30): 6476.
  • Xie L, Bao S, Pietrafesa L, Foley K, Fuentes M. 2005. A real-time hurricane surface wind forecasting model: Formulation and verification. Monthly Weather Review 134: 13551361.
  • Zerger A. 2002. Examining GIS decision utility for natural hazard risk modeling. Environmental Modelling and Software 17(3): 287294.
  • Zerger A. Smith DI, Hunter GJ, Jones SD. 2002. Riding the storm: a comparison of uncertainty modelling techniques for storm surge risk management. Applied Geography 22: 307330.