SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anthes RA, Corell RW, Holland G, Hurrell JW, McCracken MC, Trenberth KE. 2006. Hurricanes and global warming—potential linkages and consequences. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 87: 623628.
  • Beck C, Philipp A. 2010. Evaluation and comparison of circulation type classifications of the European domain. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35: 374387.
  • Cassano JJ, Uotila P, Lynch A. 2006. Changes in synoptic weather patterns in the polar regions in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, part 1: arctic. International Journal of Climatology 26: 10271049.
  • Castro CL, Pielke RA, Leoncini G. 2005. Dynamical downscaling: assessment of value retained and added using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). Journal of Geophysical Research 110: D05108.
  • Cheng CS, Auld H, Li G, Klaasen J, Li Q. 2007a. Possible impacts of climate change on freezing rain in south-central Canada using downscaled future climate scenarios. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 7: 7187.
  • Cheng CS, Campbell M, Li Q, Li G, Auld H, Day N, Pengelly D, Gingrich S, Yap D. 2007b. A synoptic climatological approach to assess climatic impact on air quality in south-central Canada. Part I: historical analysis. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 182: 131148.
  • Cheng CS, Campbell M, Li Q, Li G, Auld H, Day N, Pengelly D, Gingrich S, Yap D. 2007c. A synoptic climatological approach to assess climatic impact on air quality in south-central Canada. Part II: future estimates. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 182: 117130.
  • Cheng CS, Li G, Li Q. 2010. A synoptic weather typing approach to simulate daily rainfall and extremes in Ontario, Canada: potential for climate change projections. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 49: 845866.
  • Christensen JH, Carter TR, Rummukainen M, Amanatidis G. 2007. Evaluating the performance and utility of regional climate models: the PRUDENCE project. Climatic Change 81: 16.
  • Collins WD, Bitz CM, Blackmon ML, Bonan GB, Bretherton CS, Carton JA, Chang P, Doney SC, Hack JA, Henderson TB, Kiehl JT, Large WG, McKenna DS, Santer BD, Smith RD. 2006. The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3). Journal of Climate 19: 21222143.
  • Cuell C, Bonsall B. 2009. An assessment of climatological synoptic typing by principal component analysis and k-means clustering. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 98: 361373.
  • Demuzere M, Werner M, van Lipzig NPM, Roeckner E. 2009. An analysis of present and future ECHAM5 pressure fields using a classification of circulation patterns. International Journal of Climatology 29: 17961810.
  • Enke W, Schneider F, Deutschländer T. 2005. A novel scheme to derive optimized circulation pattern classifications for downscaling and forecast purposes. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 82: 5163.
  • Ghosh S, Mujumdar PP. 2006. Future rainfall scenario over Orissa with GCM projections by statistical downscaling. Current Science 90: 396404.
  • Hayhoe K, Sheridan SC, Kalkstein LS, Greene JS. 2010. Climate change, heat waves, and mortality projections for Chicago. Journal of Great Lakes Research 36: 6573.
  • Hewitson BC, Crane RG. 2006. Consensus between GCM climate change projections with empirical downscaling: precipitation downscaling over South Africa. International Journal of Climatology 26: 13151337.
  • Hope PK. 2006. Projected future changes in synoptic systems influencing southwest Western Australia. Climate Dynamics 26: 765780.
  • Huth R. 2000. A circulation classification scheme applicable in GCM studies. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 67: 118.
  • Huth R. 2010. Synoptic-climatological applicability of circulation classifications from the COST733 collection: first results. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35: 388394.
  • Huth R, Beck C, Philipp A, Demuzere M, Ustrnul Z, Cahynová M, Kyselý J, Tveito OE. 2008. Classifications of atmospheric circulation patterns: recent advances and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1146: 105152.
  • IPCC. 2007a. Summary for policymakers.In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, New York.
  • IPCC. 2007b. In The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, New York.
  • Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D. 1996. NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 77: 437471.
  • Lynch A, Uotila P, Cassano JJ. 2006. Changes in synoptic weather patterns in the polar regions in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, part II: Antarctic. International Journal of Climatology 26: 11811199.
  • McKendry IG, Stahl K, Moore RD. 2006. Synoptic sea-level pressure patterns generated by a general circulation model: comparison with the types derived from NCEP/NCAR re-analysis and implications for downscaling. International Journal of Climatology 26: 17271736.
  • Meehl GA, Arblaster JM, Tebaldi C. 2005. Understanding future patterns of increased precipitation intensity in climate model simulations. Geophysical Research Letters 32: L18719.
  • Philipp A, Bartholy J, Beck C, Erpicum M, Esteban P, Fettweis X, Huth R, James P, Jourdain S, Kreienkamp F, Krennert T, Lykoudis S, Michalides SC, Pianko-Kluczynska K, Post P, Alvarez DR, Schiemann R, Spekat A, Tymvios FS. 2010. Cost733cat—a database of weather and circulation type classifications. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35: 360373.
  • Pielke RA, Landsea C, Mayfield M, Laver J, Pasch R. 2005. Hurricanes and global warming. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 86: 15711575.
  • Pielke RA, Landsea C, Mayfield M, Laver J, Pasch R. 2006. Reply to “Hurricanes and global warming—potential linkages and consequences.”. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 87: 628631.
  • Saunders IR, Byrne JM. 1996. Generating regional precipitation from observed and GCM synoptic-scale pressure fields, southern Alberta, Canada. Climate Research 6: 237249.
  • Saunders IR, Byrne JM. 1999. Using synoptic surface and geopotential height fields for generating grid-scale precipitation. International Journal of Climatology 19: 11651176.
  • Schoof JT, Pryor SC. 2006. An evaluation of two GCMs: simulation of North American teleconnection indices and synoptic phenomena. International Journal of Climatology 26: 267282.
  • Sheffield J, Wood EF. 2008. Projected changes in drought occurrence under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario, IPCC AR4 simulations. Climate Dynamics 31: 79105.
  • Shepherd JM, Knutson T. 2007. The current debate on the linkage between global warming and hurricanes. Geography Compass 1: 124.
  • Sheridan SC, Lee CC. 2010. Synoptic climatology and the general circulation model. Progress in Physical Geography 34: 101109.
  • Sheridan SC, Lee CC. 2011. The self-organizing map in synoptic climatological research. Progress in Physical Geography 35: 109119.
  • Schieneman R, Frei C. 2010. How to quantify the resolution of surface climate by circulation types: an example for Alpine precipitation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35: 403410.
  • Schwartz MD. 1996. An air mass-based approach to regional GCM validation. Climate Research 6: 227235.
  • Spekat A, Kreienkamp F, Enke W. 2010. An impact-oriented classification method for atmospheric patterns. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35: 352359.
  • SPSS Inc. 2001. The SPSS Two-Step cluster component: a scalable component to segment your customers more effectively. White Paper, Technical Report, SPSS, Chicago, IL.
  • Tvetio OE. 2010. An assessment of circulation type classifications for precipitation distribution in Norway. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 35: 395402.
  • Vrac M, Hayhoe K, Stein M. 2007. Identification of intermodal comparison of seasonal circulation patterns over North America. International Journal of Climatology 27: 603620.
  • Wetterhall F, Bárdossy A, Chen D, Halldin S, Xu C. 2009. Statistical downscaling of daily precipitation over Sweden using GCM output. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 96: 95103.
  • Wilby RL, Charles SP, Zorita E, Timbal B, Whetton P, Mearns LO. 2004. Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from statistical downscaling methods. IPCC task group on data and scenario support for impact and climate analysis (TGICA). Available at http://www.ipcc-data.org/guidelines/dgm_no2_v1_09_2004.pdf (Accessed 27 June 2011).
  • Yarnal B, Comrie AC, Frakes B, Brown DP. 2001. Developments and prospects in synoptic climatology. International Journal of Climatology 21: 19231950.
  • Yarnal B. 1993. Synoptic Climatology in Environmental Analysis: A primer, Belhaven Press: London.