SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Bourn J. 2003. Hip replacement, an update. Report by the Controller & Auditor General HC 956 Session 2002–2003, National Audit Office, London: The Stationery Office.
  • 2
    The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital. 2003. Annual report Haukland, Norway: NAR.
  • 3
    National Joint Registry for England and Wales 2004. 1st Annual report Published by NJR, Didcot, England.
  • 4
    Tägil M, 2000. The morselized and impacted bone graft. Animal experiments on proteins, impaction and load. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 290: 140.
  • 5
    Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, et al. 1997. Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79-A: 18341841.
  • 6
    Mikhail WEM, Weidenhielm LR, Wretenberg P, et al. 1999. Femoral bone regeneration subsequent to impaction grafting during hip revision. Histologic analysis of a human biopsy specimen. J Arthroplasty 14: 849853.
  • 7
    Leopold SS, Rosenburg AG, Bhatt RD, et al. 1999. Cementless acetabular revision. Evaluation at an average of 10.5 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369: 179186.
  • 8
    Van Kleunen JP, Anbari KK, Vu D, et al. 2006. Impaction allografting for massive femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty using collared textured stems. J Arthroplasty 21: 362371.
  • 9
    Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzen H, et al. 2002. Early complications after one hundred and forty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A: 13231328.
  • 10
    Cabanela ME, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. 2003. Impacted cancellous graft plus cement in hip revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417: 175182.
  • 11
    Schreurs BW, Arts JJ, Verdonschot N, et al. 2005. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87-A: 24992507.
  • 12
    Ling RE, Timperley AJ, Linder L. 1993. Histology of cancellous impaction grafting in the femur. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75-B: 693696.
  • 13
    Mikhail WEM, Weidenhielm LRA, Wretenberg P, et al. 1999. Femoral bone regeneration subsequent to impaction grafting during hip revision: histologic analysis of a human biopsy specimen. J Arthroplasty 14: 849853.
  • 14
    Linder L. 2000. Cancellous impaction grafting in the human femur: histological and radiographic observations in 6 autopsy femurs and 8 biopsies. Acta Orthop Scand 71: 543552.
  • 15
    Ullmark G, Obrant KJ. 2002. Histology of impacted bone-graft incorporation. J Arthroplasty 17: 150157.
  • 16
    Mazhar Tokgozoglu A, Aydin M, Atilla B, et al. 2000. Scintigraphic evaluation of impaction grafting for total hip arthroplasty revision. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120: 416419.
  • 17
    Piert M, Winter E, Becker GA, et al. 1999. Allogenic bone graft viability after hip revision arthroplasty assessed by dynamic [18F] fluoride ion positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 26: 615624.
  • 18
    Frei H, O'Connell J, Masri BA, et al. 2005. Biological and mechanical changes of the bone graft- cement interface after impaction allografting. J Orthop Res 23: 12711279.
  • 19
    Bruder SP, Jaiswal N, Ricalton NS, et al. 1998. Mesenchymal stem cells in osteobiology and applied bone regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355(Suppl): S247S256.
  • 20
    Kon E, Muraglia A, Corsi A, et al. 2000. Autologous bone marrow stromal cells loaded onto porous hydroxyapatite ceramic accelerate bone repair in critical-size defects of sheep long bones. J Biomed Mater Res 49: 328337.
  • 21
    Kruyt MC, de Bruijn JD, Yuan H, et al. 2004. Optimization of bone tissue engineering in goats: a preoperative seeding method using cryopreserved cells and localized bone formation in calcium phosphate scaffolds. Transplantation 77: 359365.
  • 22
    Blom AW, Cunningham JL, Hughes G, et al. 2005. The compatibility of ceramic bone graft substitutes as allograft extenders for use in impaction grafting of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 87-B: 421425.
  • 23
    McGee MA, Findlay DM, Howie DW, et al. 2004. The use of OP-1 in femoral impaction grafting in a sheep model. J Orthop Res 22: 10081015.
  • 24
    Haydon CM, Mehin R, Burnett S, et al. 2004. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A: 11791185.
  • 25
    Schreurs BW, Busch VJ, Welten ML, et al. 2004. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A: 23852392.
  • 26
    Shanbhag AS, Hasselman CT, Rubash HE. 1997. The John Charnley Award. Inhibition of wear debris mediated osteolysis in a canine total hip arthroplasty model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344: 3343.
  • 27
    Millett PJ, Allen KJ, Botrom MP. 2002. Effects of alendronate on particle induced osteolysis in a rat model. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A: 236249.
  • 28
    Jakobsen T, Baas J, Bechtold JE, et al. 2007. Soaking morselized allograft in bisphosphonate impairs implant fixation Proceeding in 53rd annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Diego, California.
  • 29
    Goel VK, Drinker H, Panjabi MM, et al. 1982. Selection of an animal model for implant fixation studies: anatomical aspects. Yale J Biol Med 55: 113122.
  • 30
    Bergmann G, Siraky J, Rohlmann A, et al. 1984. A comparison of hip joint forces in sheep, dog and man. J Biomech 17: 907921.