• 1
    Dorr LD, Wan Z. 1998. Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:144151.
  • 2
    Fackler CD, Poss R. 1980. Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 151:169178.
  • 3
    Kessler O, Patil S, Stefan W, et al. 2008. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: a subject-specific approach. J Orthop Res 26:443452.
  • 4
    McCollum DE, Gray WJ. 1990. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:159170.
  • 5
    Turner RS. 1994. Postoperative total hip prosthetic femoral head dislocations. Incidence, etiologic factors, and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res 301:196204.
  • 6
    Yuan L, Shih C. 1999. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:263266.
  • 7
    Bartz RL, Nobel PC, Kadakia NR, et al. 2000. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 82:13001307.
  • 8
    Nadzadi ME, Pedersen DR, Yack HJ, et al. 2003. Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. J Biomech 36:577591.
  • 9
    Petrella AJ, Stowe JQ, D'Lima DD, et al. 2009. Computer-assisted versus manual alignment in THA: a probabilistic approach to range of motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:5055.
  • 10
    Seel MJ, Hafez MA, Eckman K, et al. 2006. Three-dimensional planning and virtual radiographs in revision total hip arthroplasty for instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:3538.
  • 11
    D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. 2000. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head–neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:315321.
  • 12
    Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, et al. 2004. The influence of head and neck geometry on stability of total hip replacement: a mechanical test study. Acta Orthop Scand 75:415421.
  • 13
    Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ, et al. 2005. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 20:1119.
  • 14
    Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, et al. 2004. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:102107.
  • 15
    Scifert CF, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, et al. 1998. A finite element analysis of factors influencing total hip dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:152162.
  • 16
    Barrack RL, Butler RA, Laster DR, et al. 2001. Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling. J Arthroplasty 16:812.
  • 17
    Padgett DE, Lipman J, Robie B, et al. 2006. Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:4852.
  • 18
    Sun H, Inaoka H, Fukuoka Y, et al. 2007. Range of motion measurement of an artificial hip joint using CT images. Med Biol Eng Comput 45:12291235.
  • 19
    Bunn A, Colwell CW Jr, D'Lima DD. 2012. Bony impingement limits design-related increases in hip range of motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:418427.
  • 20
    Stewart KJ, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ, et al. 2004. Implementing capsule representation in a total hip dislocation finite element model. Iowa Orthop J 24:18.
  • 21
    Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, et al. 2002. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech 35:543548.
  • 22
    Murray DW. 1993. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:228232.
  • 23
    Hall RM, Unsworth A. 1997. Friction in hip prostheses. Biomaterials 18:10171026.
  • 24
    Gordon AC, Patil S, Walker RH, et al. 2005. Effect of prosthesis design variables on range of motion: computer modeling, in vitro, and intraoperative results. Trans 51st Orthop Res Soc 30:1222.
  • 25
    Hewitt JD, Glisson RR, Guilak F, et al. 2002. The mechanical properties of the human hip capsule ligaments. J Arthroplasty 17:8289.
  • 26
    Li G, Gil J, Kanamori A, et al. 1999. A validated three-dimensional computational model of a human knee joint. J Biomech Eng 121:657662.
  • 27
    Stewart KJ, Edmonds-Wilson RH, Brand RA, et al. 2002. Spatial distribution of hip capsule structural and material properties. J Biomech 35:14911498.
  • 28
    Benham MP, Wright DK, Bibb R. 2001. Modelling soft tissue for kinematic analysis of multi-segment human body models. Biomed Sci Instrum 37:111116.
  • 29
    Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD. 2005. Activity-dependence of the “safe zone” for impingement versus dislocation avoidance. Med Eng Phys 27:323328.
  • 30
    Wellman S, Hewitt JD, Glisson RR, et al. 2002. An intact posterior hip capsule increases resistance to dislocation in a cadaveric model of total hip arthroplasty. Trans 48th Orthop Res Soc 27:989.
  • 31
    Colwell CW Jr, Hozack WJ, Mesko JW, et al. 2007. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty early dislocation rate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465:155158.