Clinical Trials and Translational Medicine Commentary
Drug delivery trends in clinical trials and translational medicine: Challenges and opportunities in the delivery of nucleic acid-based therapeutics
Article first published online: 22 JUN 2010
DOI: 10.1002/jps.22243
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Total views since August 2010: 2319
Additional Information
How to Cite
Xu, L. and Anchordoquy, T. (2011), Drug delivery trends in clinical trials and translational medicine: Challenges and opportunities in the delivery of nucleic acid-based therapeutics. J. Pharm. Sci., 100: 38–52. doi: 10.1002/jps.22243
Publication History
- Issue published online: 8 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 22 JUN 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 APR 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 23 APR 2010
- Manuscript Received: 12 FEB 2010
Keywords:
- biotechnology;
- cationic lipids;
- DNA/oligonucleotide delivery;
- encapsulation;
- gene delivery;
- gene vectors;
- lipoplexes;
- macromolecular drug delivery;
- nanoparticles;
- nonviral gene delivery
Abstract
The ability to deliver nucleic acids (e.g., plasmid DNA, antisense oligonucleotides, siRNA) offers the potential to develop potent vaccines and novel therapeutics. However, nucleic acid-based therapeutics are still in their early stages as a new category of biologics. The efficacy of nucleic acids requires that these molecules be delivered to the interior of the target cell, which greatly complicates delivery strategies and compromises efficiency. Due to the safety concerns of viral vectors, synthetic vectors such as liposomes and polymers are preferred for the delivery of nucleic acid-based therapeutics. Yet, delivery efficiencies of synthetic vectors in the clinic are still too low to obtain therapeutic levels of gene expression. In this review, we focus on some key issues in the field of nucleic acid delivery such as PEGylation, encapsulation and targeted delivery and provide some perspectives for consideration in the development of improved synthetic vectors. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 100:38–52, 2011

1520-6017/asset/JPS_left.gif?v=1&s=becd26fac43b87042ad04af68bbe20d6a12e64fc)
1520-6017/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=254f44b422de0f476861bd1056a1789033e2171c)
