Problematic but promising ponds? Palaeoenvironmental evidence from the Norse Eastern Settlement of Greenland

Authors

  • Kevin J. Edwards,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Geography and Environment, University of Aberdeen, Elphinstone Road, Aberdeen AB24 3UF, UK
    2. Department of Archaeology, School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
    • Department of Geography and Environment, University of Aberdeen, Elphinstone Road, Aberdeen AB24 3UF, UK.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • J. Edward Schofield,

    1. Department of Geography and Environment, University of Aberdeen, Elphinstone Road, Aberdeen AB24 3UF, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jason R. Kirby,

    1. School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Gordon T. Cook

    1. SUERC Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, East Kilbride, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Pollen- and related proxy-based studies of human–environment interactions during the Norse and later periods within Greenland have primarily involved the investigation of peat, lake and soil deposits, all of which have taphonomic and sampling problems. Many small ponds exist, but they seem to have been relatively ignored in investigations of palaeoecologically based environmental history. To evaluate their usefulness for studies of ecologically related cultural history, especially where sites are in intimate association with the archaeology, a pond in the Norse Eastern Settlement has been examined to investigate three principal questions: (i) Does such a site contain a useful record of environmental history? (ii) Does it offer a record of sufficient resolution and sensitivity for the study of anthropogenic landscape impacts? (iii) Are there any apparent drawbacks to these sequences? Using data obtained from palynological, diatom, sedimentological and radiocarbon analyses, it is concluded that environmental data for each proxy – aside from 14C dating – are clearly capable of being explained in a reasonably straightforward and compatible manner and fulfil the hopes for the sampling medium. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ancillary