SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Additional supporting information can be found in the online version of this article:

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
jqs_2552_sm_SupplFigS1.pdf442KSupplementary Figure S1: Ice extent for the three reconstructions from Hubbard et al. (2009) considered in this study. Each column represents one of the three reconstructions (‘minimal’, ‘median’ and ‘maximal’) and each row illustrates ice extent for the time (in calibrated ka BP) indicated in the top left-hand corner of each frame. Ice extent is shown at the following times (in ka BP with increment of 1 ka): (a) 37-34, (b) 33-30, (c) 29-26, (d) 25-22, (e) 21-18, (f) 17-14 and (g) 13-10.
jqs_2552_sm_SupplFigS2.pdf31KSupplementary Figure S2: Relative sea-level curves for sites in northern UK for the minimal (solid black line), median (dashed black line), and maximal (dotted black line) ice reconstructions paired with their respective optimal Earth models (that is, for the entirety of the data), which are given in Table 1. The dashed and dotted grey curves show those components of the total RSL curve for the minimal reconstruction coming specifically from local and non-local ice, respectively. Note that these components do not include a eustatic (melt water) signal. The black and grey data points represent basal and intercalated SLIPs, respectively. Inverted triangles indicate observations that provide an upper limit on RSL (so-called ‘limiting dates’).

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.