In Focus: Short Communication
Balancing fertility management and economics in organic field vegetable rotations
Article first published online: 25 SEP 2007
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3063
Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry
Issue
1097-0010/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b47620dd25eabc179c6838560a664c2310e44227)
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Volume 87, Issue 15, pages 2791–2793, December 2007
Additional Information
How to Cite
Schmutz, U., Rayns, F. and Firth, C. (2007), Balancing fertility management and economics in organic field vegetable rotations. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87: 2791–2793. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3063
Publication History
- Issue published online: 9 NOV 2007
- Article first published online: 25 SEP 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 11 JUL 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 24 MAY 2007
- Manuscript Received: 20 DEC 2005
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- organic vegetables;
- rotations;
- fertility building;
- nutrient management;
- nutrient balances;
- fertility costs;
- rotational gross margin
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Organic field-scale vegetables are among the most profitable enterprises in organic farming systems. They are also some of the most nutrient-demanding crops, and many organic arable systems with field-scale vegetables are stockless. Without livestock manure inputs, nutrient supply depends on fertility-building crops, which generate only costs and no income. Different strategies of fertility management were compared on a central England research farm. Fertility management treatments consisted of different lengths of fertility building with green waste compost additions. Outputs and inputs in terms of nutrients and economics were monitored for 31 rotations during 1996–2002.
RESULTS: N, P and K rotational nutrient balances, as well as C inputs, showed a negative relationship with rotational gross margins. Variable and allocated fixed costs of fertility building were low, between 2 and 5% of variable costs (£0.5–2 ha−1 for 1 kg N ha−1 supplied to the rotation). The intensity of vegetable cropping in these rotations was moderate (25–40% vegetable crops in the rotation) and balancing of fertility management and economics was possible at this intensity without livestock manure or other permitted fertiliser additions.
CONCLUSION: Completely stockless systems (in analogy may be called vegan) are possible in organic vegetable production without compromising on fertility or economics. However, for a higher vegetable-cropping intensity (up to 90%) a more sophisticated mix of short-term fertility-building and N-trapping crops will be needed and such rotations may require further external addition of green waste or livestock manure. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry

1097-0010/asset/JSFA_left.gif?v=1&s=7d17531bd01947370db8c9b5d9c1f94f7e88aac7)
1097-0010/asset/JSFA_right.gif?v=1&s=7c092ee3d745e3f50f345c7293c1a3d5779ebd57)