Cytodiagnosis of soft tissue tumors

Authors

  • Dr. Jan Oland MD,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Surgery A, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
    • Department of Surgery “A”, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin 70300, Israel
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ada Rosen MD,

    1. Department of Surgery A, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Renata Reif MD, FAIC,

    1. Institute of Pathology and Cytology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Joel Sayfan MD,

    1. Department of Surgery A, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ruben Orda MD, MS

    1. Department of Surgery A, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The only acceptable definitive diagnosis of a soft tissue mass is histologic or cytologic examination. In recent years, fine-needle aspiration cytology is used in more and more centers for diagnosis of soft tissue masses. We studied 196 aspiration cytologies performed on soft tissue lesions. Out of these, in 48 cases a definitive surgical procedure or open biopsy for histology and further evaluation were performed. There were 25 sarcomas and 23 benign tumors. There was one false negative cytologic result in this group; no false positive cytologies were detected. It seems that cytodiagnosis of soft tissue masses performed by an experienced pathologist is the method of choice, permitting a good diagnostic evaluation, with almost none of the traumatic and oncologic disadvantages of the other methods of biopsy.

Ancillary