The study was financially supported by the Research Foundation - Flanders (Code G.0005.08); Levenslijn-Kinderfonds administered by Koning Boudewijnstichting. The authors like to thank the schools and students who participated in the study, Davy Coppens and Hanna Delefortie for their participation in data gathering, and Dr. K. De Corte and Dr. M. Van Hemelrijck for their revision of the manuscript.
Differences in posttraumatic stress reactions between witnesses and direct victims of motor vehicle accidents†
Article first published online: 8 JUN 2012
Copyright © 2012 International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Volume 25, Issue 3, pages 280–287, June 2012
How to Cite
Tierens, M., Bal, S., Crombez, G., Loeys, T., Antrop, I. and Deboutte, D. (2012), Differences in posttraumatic stress reactions between witnesses and direct victims of motor vehicle accidents. J. Traum. Stress, 25: 280–287. doi: 10.1002/jts.21692
- Issue published online: 21 JUN 2012
- Article first published online: 8 JUN 2012
The present study describes posttraumatic stress reactions in young witnesses of motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). This study investigated (a) whether witnesses of MVAs report fewer trauma symptoms than direct victims, but more than adolescents who were never exposed to an MVA; and (b) whether individual differences in sex, negative appraisal, avoidant coping, and social support account for variability in trauma symptoms beyond status as a witness as compared to a victim. Self-report data came from a community-based sample of 3,007 adolescents with an average age of 14.6 years and comprising 53% boys. Compared to direct victims of an MVA in which someone was injured, witnesses of MVAs with injury reported significantly less internalizing symptoms, such as symptoms of posttraumatic stress (d = 0.25), fear (d = 0.21), and depression (d = 0.17). Compared to adolescents who were never exposed to an MVA with injury, witnesses reported significantly more externalizing symptoms (d = 0.24). In multiple regression analyses the significant difference between witnesses and victims disappeared when sex, other stressful events, appraisals, and coping were added to the model. These findings suggest that adolescent witnesses, as well as direct victims, may be at risk for posttraumatic reactions.