SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Hughes, C., R. Gaffney, and C. R. Dickman. 2011. A Preliminary Study Assessing Risk to Tasmanian Devils From Poisoning for Red Foxes. The journal of wildlife management 75:385–392. DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.47

In Hughes et al. (2011), Greek text incorrectly appears in equations on pages 389 and 390. The affected paragraphs should have read:

From page 389

Male animals were more likely than females to exhibit all 5 measured behaviors: males uncovered surface-level bait 1.3 times more often (equation image, P = 0.004), removed surface-level bait 2.4 times more often (equation image, P ≤ 0.001), excavated bait buried beneath a sand mound 1.7 times more often (equation image, P = 0.010), removed buried bait 2.8 times more often (equation image, P = 0.043), and excavated unbaited sand mounds 1.5 times more often (equation image, P = 0.026). The 2-year-old, captive-born animals were more likely than 4-year-old, wild-caught animals to exhibit 3 of the 5 measured behaviors: younger animals uncovered surface-level baits 1.4 times more often (equation image, P ≤ 0.001), removed surface-level baits 2.6 times more often (equation image, P ≤ 0.001), and excavated baits buried beneath a sand mound 1.8 times more often (equation image, P = 0.011). There were no differences in the 2 cohorts' removal of buried baits (equation image, P = 0.082) or in their excavation of unbaited sand mounds (equation image, P = 0.235).

From page 390

Because not every observation station was visited by devils on every night, it is more instructive to consider just those data from observation station–nights with known devil visitation (based on photographic evidence) or probable devil visitation (based on spoor in cases of camera malfunction). With data combined from the 2 phases, burial treatment influenced removal (equation image, P ≤ 0.001 for definite and probable devil visitation; equation image, P = 0.004 for definite visitation only). Removal rates were highest at 5 cm, followed by mounds, 10 cm, and 15 cm (Fig. 1). When we considered the phases separately, burial treatment influenced removal in the western phase (equation image, P = 0.016 for definite and probable devil visits; equation image, P = 0.026 for definite visits only) but not in the eastern phase (equation image, P = 0.265 for definite and probable devil visits; equation image, P = 0.314 for definite visits only). We suspect that low statistical power was responsible for the lack of significance for the eastern phase.

Wiley-Blackwell apologizes to the authors for this error.