Get access

Decision making in advanced otosclerosis: An Evidence-Based Strategy

Authors

  • Paul Merkus MD, PhD,

    Corresponding author
    1. Cochlear Implant Center Amsterdam VUMC, Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, KNO 1d-114, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Maarten C. van Loon MD,

    1. Cochlear Implant Center Amsterdam VUMC, Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Conrad F. Smit MD, PhD,

    1. Cochlear Implant Center Amsterdam VUMC, Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Cas Smits PhD,

    1. Cochlear Implant Center Amsterdam VUMC, Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Adrianus F. C. de Cock MD,

    1. Cochlear Implant Center Amsterdam VUMC, Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Erik F. Hensen MD

    1. Cochlear Implant Center Amsterdam VUMC, Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

  • The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

  • Presented at the Joint Meeting IV: Consensus in Auditory Implants, Parma, Italy, June 16–19, 2010.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis:

To propose an evidence-based strategy for the management of patients with advanced otosclerosis accompanied by severe to profound hearing loss.

Study Design:

Systematic review of the literature and development of treatment guidelines.

Methods:

A systematic review was conducted on (advanced) otosclerosis and cochlear implantation or stapedotomy. We focused on hearing results, radiological findings, and surgical complications. Based on the results of the literature review and our own experience, we suggest a strategy to make decisions for the treatment of patients with advanced otosclerosis.

Results:

In cases of severe mixed hearing loss due to advanced otosclerosis, hearing aids may not result in optimal hearing rehabilitation, and cochlear implantation can be considered. However, there could be specific surgical dilemmas concerning cochlear implantation in advanced otosclerosis due to otospongiotic foci around, and otosclerotic foci within, the cochlea. Decision making in these patients can be difficult, especially because a stapedotomy may still be an effective treatment next to hearing aids. An algorithm is presented, based on the speech discrimination score, computed tomography classification and the air-bone gap, which will guide the surgeon to either cochlear implantation, stapedotomy, or a hearing aid and follow-up.

Conclusions:

To achieve optimal hearing with minimal disadvantages in patients with otosclerosis and severe to profound hearing loss, an algorithm can help in the selection of patients for either cochlear implantation, stapedotomy, or hearing aids and follow-up.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary