Presented at the 21st North American Skull Base Society Meeting, Scottsdale, Arizona, U.S.A., February 18, 2011.
Article first published online: 8 AUG 2012
Copyright © 2012 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.
Volume 122, Issue 9, pages 1925–1932, September 2012
How to Cite
Lee, S., Gallia, G. L., Reh, D. D., Schafer, S., Uneri, A., Mirota, D. J., Nithiananthan, S., Otake, Y., Stayman, J. W., Zbijewski, W. and Siewerdsen, J. H. (2012), Intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography: Quantitative analysis of surgical performance in skull base surgery. The Laryngoscope, 122: 1925–1932. doi: 10.1002/lary.23374
There were no commercial interests in the technologies described in this article. The research in this study was supported by NIH grant R01-CA-127444 and was performed in collaboration with Siemens Health Care (Erlangen, Germany). The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2012
- Article first published online: 8 AUG 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 28 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 22 FEB 2012
- Manuscript Received: 7 NOV 2011
- Cone-beam computed tomography;
- intraoperative imaging;
- skull base surgery;
- image-guided surgery;
- endoscopic sinus surgery
To determine whether incorporation of intraoperative imaging via a new cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image-guidance system improves accuracy and facilitates resection in sinus and skull-base surgery through quantification of surgical performance.
Landmark identification and skull base ablation tasks were performed with a CBCT intraoperative image-guidance system in the experimental group and with image-guided surgery (IGS) alone based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) in the control group.
Six cadaveric heads underwent preoperative CT imaging and surgical planning identifying surgical targets. Three types of surgical tasks were planned: landmark point identification, line contour identification, and volume drill-out. Key anatomic structures (carotid artery and optic nerve) were chosen for landmark identification and line contour tasks. Complete ethmoidectomy, vidian corridor drill-out, and clival resection were performed for volume ablation tasks. The CBCT guidance system was used in the experimental group and performance was assessed by metrics of target registration error, sensitivity, and specificity of excision.
Significant improvements were seen for point identification and line tracing tasks. Additional resection was performed in 67% of tasks in the CBCT group, and qualitative feedback indicated unequivocal improvement in confidence for all tasks. In review of tasks in the control group, additional resection would have been performed in 35% of tasks if an intraoperative image was available.
An experimental prototype C-arm CBCT guidance system was shown to improve surgical precision in the identification of skull base targets and increase accuracy in the ablation of surgical target volumes in comparison to using IGS alone.