• 1
    Lunn W, Garland R, Ashiku S, Thurer RL, Feller-Kopman D, Ernst A. Microdebrider bronchoscopy: A new tool for the interventional bronchoscopist. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:14851488.
  • 2
    Becker DG. Technical considerations in powered instrumentation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1997;30:421434.
  • 3
    Setliff RC, Parsons DS. The Hummer: New instrumentation for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 1994;8:275278.
  • 4
    Cantarella G, Viglinoe S, Forti S, Minetti A, Pignataro L. Comparing postoperative quality of life in children after microdebrider intracapsular tonsillotomy and tonsillectomy. Auris Nasus Larynx 2012;39:407410.
  • 5
    Pagella F, Pusateri A, Canzi P, et al. The evolution of the adenoidectomy: analysis of different power-assisted techniques. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2011;24(4 Suppl):5559.
  • 6
    Goh T, Tan BK, Song C. Use of the microdebrider for treatment of fibrous gynaecomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:506510.
  • 7
    Myer CM, Willging JP, McMurray S, Cotton RT. Use of a laryngeal micro resector system. Laryngoscope 1999;109:11651166.
  • 8
    Schraff S, Derkay CS, Burke B, et al. American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology members' experience with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis and the use of adjuvant therapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:10391042.
  • 9
    Holler T, Allegro J, Chadha NK, et al. Voice outcomes following repeated surgical resection of laryngeal papillomata in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;141:522526.
  • 10
    Flint PW. Powered surgical instruments for laryngeal surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:263266.
  • 11
    Gheriani H, Khan MH, Russell JD. Use of the laryngeal microdebrider blade in treating Teflon-induced vocal fold granuloma: A case report. Ear Nose Throat J 2009;88:E46.
  • 12
    Ranson E. Microdebrider resection of acquired subglottic cysts: case series and review of the literature. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:18331836.
  • 13
    Zalzal GH, Collins WO. Microdebrider-assisted supraglottoplasty. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:305309.
  • 14
    Bruggers S, Sindwani R. Innovations in microdebrider technology and design. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42:781787.
  • 15
    Bhatti MT, Giannoni CM, Raynor E, et al. Ocular motility complications after endoscopic sinus surgery with powered cutting instruments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:501509.
  • 16
    Cheng AY, Soliman AM. Use of a microdebrider for subepithelial excision of benign vocal fold lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010;119:782785.
  • 17
    Boone JL, Feldt BA, McMains KC, Weitzel EK. Improved function of prototype 4.3mm Medtronic Quadcut microdebrider blade over standard 4.0mm Medtronic Tricut microdebrider blade. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2011;1:198200.
  • 18
    Sindwani R, Manz R. Technological innovations in tissue removal during rhinologic surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012;26;6569.
  • 19
    HPCS (Healthcare Product Comparison System): Suction Regulators ECRI. J Healthc Manag 1994;3945.
  • 20
    Mortensen M, Woo P. An underreported complication of laryngeal microdebrider: Vocal fold web and granuloma: A case report. Laryngoscope 2009;119:18481850.
  • 21
    Chen T, Sailey SH, Naze SA, Jiang JJ. The head-mounted microscope: A Potential precision improvement in phonomicrosurgery. Laryngoscope 2012;122:781784.