This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R21 1R21EB008490-01A1 and the Hartwell Foundation Postdoctoral fellowship. The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Anatomical reconstructions of pediatric airways from endoscopic images: A pilot study of the accuracy of quantitative endoscopy
Version of Record online: 10 MAY 2013
Copyright © 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Volume 123, Issue 11, pages 2880–2887, November 2013
How to Cite
Meisner, E. M., Hager, G. D., Ishman, S. L., Brown, D., Tunkel, D. E. and Ishii, M. (2013), Anatomical reconstructions of pediatric airways from endoscopic images: A pilot study of the accuracy of quantitative endoscopy. The Laryngoscope, 123: 2880–2887. doi: 10.1002/lary.24046
- Issue online: 28 OCT 2013
- Version of Record online: 10 MAY 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 17 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 5 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 3 APR 2012
- Subglottic stenosis;
- airway reconstruction;
- computed tomography;
- quantitative endoscopy
To evaluate the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) airway reconstructions obtained using quantitative endoscopy (QE). We developed this novel technique to reconstruct precise 3D representations of airway geometries from endoscopic video streams. This method, based on machine vision methodologies, uses a post-processing step of the standard videos obtained during routine laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. We hypothesize that this method is precise and will generate assessment of airway size and shape similar to those obtained using computed tomography (CT).
This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB). We analyzed video sequences from pediatric patients receiving rigid bronchoscopy.
We generated 3D scaled airway models of the subglottis, trachea, and carina using QE. These models were compared to 3D airway models generated from CT. We used the CT data as the gold standard measure of airway size, and used a mixed linear model to estimate the average error in cross-sectional area and effective diameter for QE.
The average error in cross sectional area (area sliced perpendicular to the long axis of the airway) was 7.7 mm2 (variance 33.447 mm4). The average error in effective diameter was 0.38775 mm (variance 2.45 mm2), approximately 9% error.
Our pilot study suggests that QE can be used to generate precise 3D reconstructions of airways. This technique is atraumatic, does not require ionizing radiation, and integrates easily into standard airway assessment protocols. We conjecture that this technology will be useful for staging airway disease and assessing surgical outcomes.
Level of Evidence
N/A. Laryngoscope, 123:2880–2887, 2013