Get access

Evaluation of a teaching tool to increase the accuracy of pilot balloon palpation for measuring tracheostomy tube cuff pressure

Authors


  • The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

  • This manuscript was the winner of the 2013 First Place Richard J. Bellucci, MD, Resident Research Award and has been accepted for oral presentation at the Triological Society Combined Sections Meeting, to be held in Scottsdale, Arizona, U.S.A., January 24–26, 2013.

Send correspondence to Nancy Jiang, MD, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1189, New York, NY 10029. E-mail: nancy.jiang@mountsinai.org

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel teaching tool to improve health care providers' ability to inflate tracheostomy tube cuffs to the appropriate pressure.

Study Design

Single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.

Methods

Subjects were randomized to a control and study group. The control group viewed a video about inflating tracheostomy tube cuffs to safe pressure levels. The study group viewed the same video and also got to palpate the pilot balloons of tracheostomy tube cuffs inflated to three different pressures. All subjects inflated tracheostomy tube cuffs to pressures they believed to be appropriate based on palpation of the pilot balloon preintervention, and immediately, 2 weeks, and 3 months postintervention.

Results

Forty-nine health care providers participated in the study. There was no significant difference in the mean preintervention cuff inflation pressures between the two groups (36 cm H2O vs. 38 cm H2O, P = 0.4888), with both initially overinflating. Postintervention, the study group inflated the cuffs to significantly lower pressures than the control group, closer to the ideal of 25 cm H2O (26 cm H2O vs. 35 cm H2O, P = 0.0001). This difference was also observed 2 weeks (28 cm H2O vs. 37 cm H2O P <0.0001) and 3 months (28 cm H2O vs. 36 cm H2O, P = 0.0002) postintervention.

Conclusions

The novel teaching tool evaluated in this study is simple, easily reproducible, and low-cost. Its use leads to long-lasting improvement in health care providers' ability to more accurately inflate tracheostomy tube cuffs to safe pressures.

Level of Evidence

1b. Laryngoscope, 123:1884–1888, 2013

Ancillary