Get access

Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection

Authors

  • Eugenie Du MD,

    1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Thomas J. Ow MD,

    1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
    2. Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Yung-Tai Lo PhD,

    1. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Adam Gersten MD,

    1. Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Bradley A. Schiff MD,

    1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Andrew B. Tassler MD,

    1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Richard V. Smith MD

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
    2. Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A
    • Send correspondence to Richard V. Smith, MD, 3400 Bainbridge Avenue, 3rd Floor, Bronx, NY 10467. E-mail: rsmith@montefiore.org

    Search for more papers by this author

  • Presented at the Triological Annual Meeting at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A., April 22–26, 2015.

  • The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

Previous studies report high-accuracy rates for intraoperative frozen sections, but reliability of frozen sections in predicting the ultimate final margin status is unknown. We compared frozen and permanent reads to identify risk factors for overall discrepancies between intraoperative and final margin status.

Study Design

Retrospective chart review.

Methods

Pathology reports of 437 surgical resections between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 253 cases, generating 1,109 individual specimens, met inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, treatment, recurrence, and survival, as well as pathology data pertaining to the specimen, were recorded.

Results

Frozen read accuracy was 96.7% (83.1% sensitivity, 97.9% specificity) relative to permanent evaluation. However, 4.3% of cases had a final positive margin not detected by frozen section; 17.8% had a close margin not detected by frozen section. In eight of 11 cases with missed positive margins, the involved margin was never sampled intraoperatively. Cases where intraoperative margins were only taken from surrounding tissue had a higher risk of missing a close or positive final margin when compared to cases where some or all margins were taken from the specimen (odds ratio = 5.05, 95% confidence interval [2.31, 11.07], P <0.0001). Disease subsite, risk score, prior radiation, staging, and p16 expression were not significantly associated with the likelihood of missing a close or positive final margin.

Conclusion

Individual frozen section reads are highly accurate. However, negative intraoperative margins do not guarantee margin-negative resections. The process of selecting representative margins for intraoperative analysis, specifically the practice of sampling the resection bed, should be refined.

Level of Evidence

N/A. Laryngoscope, 126:1768–1775, 2016

Ancillary