You have free access to this content

Correlatives

  1. Adrian Brasoveanu†

Article first published online: 2 JAN 2012

DOI: 10.1002/lnc3.318

Issue

Language and Linguistics Compass

Language and Linguistics Compass

Volume 6, Issue 1, pages 1–20, January 2012

Additional Information

How to Cite

Brasoveanu, A. (2012), Correlatives. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6: 1–20. doi: 10.1002/lnc3.318

Author Information

  1. University of California, Santa Cruz

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 2 JAN 2012
  2. Article first published online: 2 JAN 2012

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (283K)

Works Cited

  1. Works Cited
  2. Further Reading
  • Andrews, A. 1975. Studies in the syntax of relative and comparative clauses, , MIT PhD dissertation [Published by New York: Garland, 1985].
  • Barker, Chris. 1999. Individuation and quantification. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 683–91.
  • Beck, S. 1997. On the semantics of comparative conditionals. Linguistics and Philosophy 20. 229–71.
  • van den Berg, M. 1996. Some aspects of the internal structure of discourse. The dynamics of nominal Anaphora, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.
  • Bhatt, Rajesh. 2003. Locality in correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 485–541.
  • Bittner, M. 2001. Topical referents for individuals and possibilities, Proceedings of SALT XI, ed. by R. Hastings, et al., 36–55. CLC, Ithaca: Cornell University.
  • Brasoveanu, Adrian. 2008a. uniqueness effects in correlatives. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, ed. by A. Grønn, 47–65. (ISBN 978-82-92800-00-3).
  • Brasoveanu, Adrian. 2008b. Comparative correlatives as Anaphora to differentials. In Proceedings of SALT XVIII, ed. by T. Friedman and S. Ito, 126–43. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.
  • Brasoveanu, Adrian. 2008c. Donkey pluralities. Linguistics and Philosophy 31. 129–209.
  • Brasoveanu, Adrian. 2010. Decomposing modal quantification. Journal of Semantics. Advance access published on 20 July 2010. Doi: 10.1093/jos/ffq008.
  • Cappelle, Bert. forthcoming. The ‘‘the… the…’’ construction: meaning and readings. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 99–117. Doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.002.
  • Dayal, Veneeta. 1995. Quantification in correlatives. Quantification in Natural Language, ed. by E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee, 179–205. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Dayal, Veneeta. 1996. Locality in Wh Quantification: Questions and Relative Clauses in Hindi. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • den Dikken, M. 2005. Comparative correlatives comparatively. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 497–532.
  • Farkas, Donka F. and Henriette de Swart. 2003. The Semantics of Incorporation. Stanford: CSLI.
  • Gajewski, J. 2008. On the semantics of Hindi-Urdu multiple correlatives. Linguistic Inquiry 39. 327–34.
  • Geurts, Bart. 2002. Donkey Business. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 129–56.
  • Heim, I. 1990. E-Type pronouns and donkey Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13. 137–77.
  • Jacobson, P. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. Quantification in Natural Language, ed, by E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee, 451–86. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Kadmon, Nirit. 1990. Uniqueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 13. 273–324.
  • Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. Syntax and semantics, volume 7: Notes from the linguistic underground, ed. by J. D. McCawley, 363–85. New York: Academic Press.
  • Krifka, Manfred. 1990. Four thousand ships passed through the lock: object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 13. 487–520.
  • Lewis, David. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. Formal semantics of natural language, ed. by E. Keenan, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McCawley, J. 1988. The comparative conditional construction in English, German and Chinese. Proceedings of BLS 14. 176–87.
  • McCawley, J.. 1992. Remarks on adsentential, adnominal and extraposed relative clauses in Hindi. Presented at South Asian Languages Analysis, Stanford University, Berkeley.
  • Moens, M., and M. Steedman. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14. 15–28.
  • Nouwen, Rick. 2003. Plural pronominal anaphora in context. PhD dissertation, UiL-OTS, Utrecht University, LOT Dissertation Series 84.
  • Partee, B. 1984. Nominal and temporal Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7. 243–86.
  • Pollard, Carl., and Ivan Sag 1994. Head-Driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Roberts, C. 1989. Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12. 683–721.
  • Sells, Peter. 1985. Restrictive and non-restrictive modification. Report No. CSLI-85-28, Stanford: Stanford University, CSLI.
  • Srivastav, Veneeta. 1991. The syntax and semantics of correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9. 637–86.
  • Stone, M. 1997. The anaphoric parallel between modality and tense. IRCS Report 97-06, Philadelphia: Universityof Pennsylvania.

Further Reading

  1. Works Cited
  2. Further Reading
  • Gallin, Daniel. 1975. Intensional and higher-order modal logic with applications to montague semantics. New York: North-Holland Mathematics Studies.
  • Geach, P. T. 1962. Reference and generality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1991. Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14. 39–100.
  • Hale, K. 1976. The adjoined relative clause in Australia. Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, ed. by R. Dixon, 78–105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
  • Heim, I. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst: UMass PhD dissertation [published in 1988, StateNew York: Garland].
  • Kamp, Hans. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Part 1, ed. by J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof, 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Center.
  • Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. Meaning, use and interpretation of language, ed. by R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow, 302–23. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Montague, Richard. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. Formal philosophy, 1974, ed. by R. Thomason, 247–70. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Muskens, Reinhard. 1996. Combining montague semantics and discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 19. 143–86.
  • Nelken, R. and N. Francez. 1995. Splitting the reference time: temporal anaphora and quantification in DRT. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 261–6. Association for Computational Linguistics, University College Dublin: Dublin, Ireland.
  • Nelken, R., and N. Francez. 1997. Splitting the reference time: the analogy between nominal and temporal Anaphora revisited. Journal of Semantics 14. 369–416.
  • Stone, M. 1999. Reference to possible worlds. RuCCS Report 49, New Brunswick: Rutgers University.
  • Webber, B. 1988. Tense as discourse Anaphor. Computational linguistics 14. 61–73.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (283K)