Assistant Clinical Professor.
Clinical Reports
Monopolar radiofrequency treatment of human eyelids: A prospective, multicenter, efficacy trial
Article first published online: 12 DEC 2006
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20452
Copyright © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Biesman, B. S., Baker, S. S., Carruthers, J., Silva, H. L. and Holloman, E. L. (2006), Monopolar radiofrequency treatment of human eyelids: A prospective, multicenter, efficacy trial. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 38: 890–898. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20452
Publication History
- Issue published online: 12 DEC 2006
- Article first published online: 12 DEC 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 SEP 2006
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- monopolar radiofrequency;
- eyelid;
- tissue;
- tightening
Abstract
Background/Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of a novel 0.25 cm2 monopolar radiofrequency (RF) treatment tip for aesthetic rejuvenation of the eyelids.
Study Design/Materials and Methods
This was a prospective, multicenter trial in which the eyelids of 72 patients were treated. Patients underwent a single treatment session and were then followed on a serial basis for 6 months. Cutaneous anesthesia was not required to perform the treatments. Assessments were made by the treating physician, the subjects, and by masked physician observers evaluating photographs taken at each data point.
Results
Upper eyelid tightening and reduction of hooding was noted in 88 and 86% of subjects, respectively. Lower eyelid tightening was noted in 71–74% of subjects. The majority of patients treated achieved at least up to 25% improvement while a smaller percentage achieved more dramatic results. There was no correlation between the amount of energy applied to the eyelids and the clinical outcome. There were no serious adverse sequelae.
Conclusion
Human eyelids can be safely treated with monopolar RF energy delivered via a novel 0.25 cm2 treatment tip. Using this technology non-invasive eyelid rejuvenation was achieved in the majority of subjects treated. The factors differentiating those patients who achieve the most impressive changes from others remain unclear. Further development and testing of this technology is warranted. Lasers Surg. Med. 38:890–898, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1096-9101/asset/LSM_left.gif?v=1&s=43bd509b64ead22af71f1cde54200b5a980e7c16)
1096-9101/asset/LSM_right.gif?v=1&s=1257886a6812ba45f6961f74d9139da76064d213)
