Telephone: 39 081 7473433; FAX: 39 081 7473433
Original Articles
Wide gene expression profiling of ischemia-reperfusion injury in human liver transplantation
Article first published online: 27 DEC 2006
DOI: 10.1002/lt.20960
Copyright © 2006 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Additional Information
How to Cite
Conti, A., Scala, S., D'Agostino, P., Alimenti, E., Morelli, D., Andria, B., Tammaro, A., Attanasio, C., Ragione, F. D., Scuderi, V., Fabbrini, F., D'Esposito, M., Di Florio, E., Nitsch, L., Calise, F. and Faiella, A. (2007), Wide gene expression profiling of ischemia-reperfusion injury in human liver transplantation. Liver Transpl, 13: 99–113. doi: 10.1002/lt.20960
Publication History
- Issue published online: 27 DEC 2006
- Article first published online: 27 DEC 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 1 AUG 2006
- Manuscript Received: 10 APR 2006
Funded by
- “High Committee for Transplantation of Campania Region,”
- MIUR (Italian Ministry for Education, University, and Research)
- BIOGEM (Biotechnology and Molecular Genetics in Southern Italy)
- CNR (National Research Council)
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) causes up to 10% of early liver failures in humans and can lead to a higher incidence of acute and chronic rejection. So far, very few studies have investigated wide gene expression profiles associated with the IRI process. The discovery of novel genes activated by IRI might lead to the identification of potential target genes for the prevention or treatment of the injury. In our study, we compared gene expression levels in reperfused livers (RL group) vs. the basal values before retrieval from the donor (basal liver [BL] group) using oligonucleotide array technology. We examined 10 biopsies from 5 livers, analyzing approximately 33,000 genes represented on the Affymetrix HG-U133APlus 2.0 oligonucleotide arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). About 13,000 individual genes were considered expressed in at least 1 condition. A total of 795 genes whose expression is significantly modified by ischemia-reperfusion in human liver transplantation were identified in this study. Some of them are likely to be completely activated by IRI, as they are not expressed in basal livers. The supervised gene expression analysis revealed that at least 12% of the genes involved in the apoptotic process, 12.5% of the genes involved in inflammatory processes, and 22.5% of the genes encoding for heat shock proteins are differentially expressed in RL samples vs. BL samples. Furthermore, IRI induces the upregulation of some genes' coding for adhesion molecules and integrins. In conclusion, we have identified a relevant amount of early genes regulated in the human liver after 7–9 hours of cold ischemia and 2 hours from reperfusion, many of them not having been described before in this process. Their analyses may help us to better understand the pathophysiology of IRI and to characterize potential target genes for the prevention or treatment of the liver injury in order to increase the number of patients that successfully undergo transplantation. Liver Transpl 13:99–113, 2007. © 2006 AASLD.
Orthotopic liver transplantation has become an effective therapeutic approach for end-stage liver diseases. Advances in surgical procedures and immunosuppression protocols have considerably improved patient survival after liver transplantation. However, ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), an antigen-independent component of the insult to the liver, represents a major problem affecting the outcome of liver transplantation. IRI causes up to 10% of early liver failures and can lead to a higher incidence of acute and chronic rejection.1 Moreover, with the increasing donor shortage, more functionally “suboptimal or “marginal” livers are being used. Such livers are more susceptible to the damage caused by IRI compared with normal livers.2
Liver IRI is mediated by several processes that lead to hepatocellular damage, which is triggered when the liver is transiently deprived of oxygen during the organ procurement for transplantation and later reoxygenated during reperfusion. These destructive effects arise mostly from acute generation of reactive oxygen species subsequent to reoxygenation that inflict direct tissue injury even though different mechanisms mediate the early, intermediate, and late phase of hepatic IRI. Ischemia activates Kupffer cells, which are the main sources of vascular reactive oxygen species formation during the initial reperfusion period.3–5 The consequent production of free radicals, cytokines, and chemokines by Kupffer cells principally mediates the middle phase of reperfusion injury for up to 6 hours after restoration of the blood flow.6 In addition to the molecular mechanism of direct vascular and parenchymal injury (inactivation of antiproteases and direct cytotoxic effects), reactive oxygen species can promote reperfusion injury through stimulation of the transcription factors nuclear factor [NF]-kB and activator protein-1 (AP-1).7, 8 The postischemic oxidant stress can enhance the expression of genes such as tumor necrosis factor α, inducible nitric oxide synthase, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), CXC chemokines, and adhesion molecules.9
The whole process involved in IRI is also regulated by a great number of transcription factors, through many signaling pathways. Gene expression variations following the IRI process have been investigated mainly in rat liver. To our knowledge, the wide gene expression profile associated with this process in human cadaveric liver transplantation has never been investigated in depth. Only 1 paper describing the gene expression profiling of acute liver stress during living donor liver transplantation has been published.10
The aim of the present study was to identify, in the human transplanted liver, genes that modulate their expression level in response to IRI early, using a larger-scale technology. By oligonucleotide microarray analysis of 33,000 known genes, we have identified more than 700 genes whose expression is significantly regulated by ischemia-reperfusion during transplantation of human cadaveric livers. Similarities and differences with previous studies are discussed.
Expression patterns of genes involved in IRI and comparison to the expression profile in basal conditions can provide insight into the changes in gene expression associated with cellular dysfunction and concomitant regulatory pathways underlying ischemia and reperfusion, suggesting better therapeutic protocols for both prevention and treatment of the injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental Design
In the first 4 months of 2005, 16 OLTs were performed at the Transplantation Center of the Cardarelli Hospital in Naples, Italy. We examined 10 biopsies from 5 livers from cadaveric donors. Two biopsies were collected from each liver: 1 biopsy before explantation from the donor (basal liver [BL] group), as the first step, immediately after opening, before ice was applied, and 1 biopsy about 2–3 hours after liver reperfusion in the recipient organism (reperfused livers [RL] group).
Livers were retrieved from donors classified as “standard” and “not standard,” according to the criteria of the “Italian National Transplantation Center.” Of 5 donors, 4 were “standard”; only LT 10 was “not standard” because of age (83 years). In particular, the donors' ages ranged from 38 to 83 years. There was no hypotension, and steatosis was always less than 15%. Mean cold ischemia time was 7 hours, mean warm ischemia time was 45 minutes and mean hospitalization in the intensive care unit was 5 days. Age, recipient gender, and liver ischemia times are shown in Table 1 together with donor and graft information.
| Donor and Graft Characteristics | Recipient Characteristics | Liver Ischemia Time | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Code | Age/Gender | Steatosis | ALT/ASTUI/L | Age/Gender | Pathology | Cold Ischemia Time | Warm Ischemia Time |
| |||||||
| LT 8 | 48/F | <10% | 47/31 | 55/M | Cirrhosis HBV | 8 h 50 min | 60 min |
| LT 10 | 83/F | <10% | 107/33 | 34/M | Cirrhosis HBV | 8 h 15 min | 40 min |
| LT 15 | 40/M | 15% | 89/75 | 53/M | Cirrhosis HCV | 6 h 50 min | 40 min |
| LT 17 | 38/M | <10% | 41/78 | 48/F | Cirrhosis HCV | 7 h 30 min | 50 min |
| LT 18 | 58/F | 15% | 116/107 | 47/F | Cirrhosis HBV | 6 h 50 min | 45 min |
BL and RL groups were compared by evaluating gene expression before and after liver ischemia-reperfusion. Ten microarray hybridizations were performed using 5 biological replicates per condition.
Sample Collection and RNA Extraction
Liver biopsies for BL samples were collected in different hospitals, whereas biopsies for RL samples were collected at the Transplantation Center of the Cardarelli Hospital. All biopsies were obtained with informed consent given according to protocols approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Biopsies were instantly submerged in the RNAlater solution (Quiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) and then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −135°C until RNA extraction.
Liver Transplantation Procedure
For liver retrieval, the inferior vena cava (IVC), suprahepatic vena cava, portal vein, and bile duct were isolated in the donor. The aorta was dissected at the origin of the celiac axis, and the celiac artery dissected from its origin to junction with the hepatic artery. After intravenous administration of 200 IU of heparin, the liver was flushed via a cannula placed in the aorta with cold Celsior preservation solution (Imtix Sangstat, Lyon, France),11 and some ice was placed in the donor abdomen for local cooling. The liver was excised and separated from the diaphragm, the right adrenal gland was placed in a basin with cold Celsior preservation solution for preparation of IVC and portal vein cuffs and then stored in a sealed container with Celsior preservation solution at 4°C for about 7–9 hours before implantation.
Total ischemia time was considered as the window time from devascularization in the donor and portal reperfusion in the recipient. It includes a long period of cold ischemia at 4°C (cold ischemia time), applied intentionally to reduce metabolic activities, and a short period of 40-60 minutes (warm ischemia time) at increasing variable temperature, while performing the vascular reconstruction. Portal circulation was restored by connecting the retrohepatic venae cavae with a continuous suture and performing a termino-terminal anastomosis with the 2 portal veins. The arterial flow and the bile duct were reconstituted with an end-to-end anastomosis.12
After surgery, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase enzymes and bilirubin were evaluated every day. The aspartate aminotransferase level ranged from 243 to 648 on the first day and from 23 to 53 on the fifth day. The alanine aminotransferase ranged from 239 to 424 on the first day and from 44 to 153 on the fifth day. Overall, maximum raise of bilirubin was 5.3 mg/dL (second patient on the third day post-OLT). No rejection episode was observed.
One-year follow-up showed good liver function in all recipients, and no major adverse event was noticed in the clinical course.
Array Processing
All the experiments were performed with Affymetrix HG-U133A Plus 2.0 oligonucleotide arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Total RNA from each sample was extracted using Trizol reagent (Gibco/BRL Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) and used to prepare biotinylated target complementary RNA, according to the Affymetrix protocols.13 Quality and amount of starting RNA was confirmed using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA).
Ten micrograms of high-quality total RNA were used to generate first-strand complementary DNA using Affymetrix GeneChip T7- oligo(dT) promoter primer; the second-strand synthesis was performed using the Superscript Choice Kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Breda, The Netherlands). In vitro transcription and labeling of complementary RNA was performed with biotinylated UTP and CTP using the Affymetrix IVT labeling Kit. The target complementary RNA generated from each sample was fragmented, washed, and stained according to the instructions provided by Affymetrix. Briefly, spike controls were added to 10-μg fragmented complementary RNA before overnight hybridization. Arrays were then washed and stained with streptavidin-phycoerythrin, before being scanned on an Affymetrix GeneChip scanner 3000.14
Microarray Data Acquisition and Analysis
The Affymetrix Software Microarray Suite (version 5.0) was used to assign to each probe set an “average difference” value corresponding to the expression level of the gene it represented. To make comparisons across different chips, data sets on each chip were scaled to a targeted total fluorescence of 500.
GeneSpring software, version 7.3 (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA), was used for data mining. Raw expression data per gene were normalized to median. Normalized data were log-transformed.
Expression data were prefiltered to reduce noise and so discard “unreliable” genes by using the Cross-Gene error model.15 Furthermore, genes were considered reliable when called present in at least 2 out of 10 samples and with a raw signal higher than 10.0. Data were excluded with standard deviation >0.3 within the control group.
Differentially expressed genes were grouped according to Gene Ontology (GO) consortium classification for biological processes and molecular functions.16 Using the GOTree Machine,17 GO categories have been identified with significantly enriched gene numbers in the gene lists when compared to the Affymetrix chip gene set, used as a reference list.18, 19
Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
Expression values of 14 genes from the 5 liver samples were checked by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The same batch of total RNA was used both for primary gene expression and validation experiments.
Complementary DNA was synthesized with random hexamer primers starting from 1.5 μg of total RNA using the reverse transcription protocol (Taqman Reverse Transcription, Applied Biosystems, Applera, Monza, Italy). Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Green I Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Applera) on the DNA Engine Opticon 2 System (MJ Research, Boston, MA) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Reactions were performed in 20 μL total volume with 0.2 μmol/L primers; nucleotides, Taq DNA polymerase, and buffer were included in the SYBR Green I Master mix. PCR reactions were performed in triplicate. The primers (Primm Biotech Products and Services, Milan, Italy) used for amplification are listed in Table 2. Primer pairs were designed using the Primer 3 software20 to obtain amplicons ranging from 100 to 150 base pair, and specifically designed to span introns or cross intron/exon boundaries. Data normalization was performed using hydroxymethyl-bilane synthase as housekeeping gene.21
| Probe Set | Gene Name | Acc. number ENSEMBL | Left Primer | Right Primer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 202076_at | BIRC2 | ENSG00000110330 | GGAGAAGGAAAAACAAGCTGAA | TGTTGAAAGAGAGCCATTCTGTT |
| 230499_at | BIRC3 | ENSG00000023445 | CCAGTTACCCTCATCTACTTGAACA | TGAATGGTCTTCTCCAGGTTC |
| 201236_s_at | BTG2 | ENSG00000159388 | GTGAGCGAGCAGAGGCTTA | ATGCGAATGCAGCGGTAG |
| 227558_at | CBX4 | ENSG00000141582 | ACCGGAGGAGAACATCCTG | CACTAGCGGTTTGGGCTTC |
| 206432_at | HAS2 | ENSG00000170961 | CAAAAATGGGGTGGAAAAAG | ACAGATGAGGCTGGGTCAAG |
| 205601_s_at | HOXB5 | ENSG00000120075 | TATTCCCCTGGATGAGGAAG | AGGGTCTGGTAGCGGGTAT |
| 215485_s_at | ICAM1 | ENSG00000090339 | TGATGGGCAGTCAACAGCTA | GCAGCGTAGGGTAAGGTTCTT |
| 228287_at | ING5 | ENSG00000168395 | GCTGATGCGAGAGCTGGA | AGGCGTTCTGGATCTTCTGC |
| 202068_s_at | LDLR | ENSG00000130164 | GACCTGTTCCCGACACCTC | CACGCTACTGGGCTTCTTCT |
| 205192_at | MAP3K14 | ENSG00000006062 | ACAGGATGGAGGACAAGCAG | AAAGGGACAATTCTGGGTGA |
| 209239_at | NFKB1 | ENSG00000109320 | CCTGGTGCCTCTAGTGAAAAG | TGAACAATAACCTTTGCTGGTC |
| 202464_s_at | PFKFB3 | ENSG00000170525 | GTGTGCGACGACCCTACAGT | CTTCTGCCGAGTTGCAGTCT |
| 200688_at | SF3B3 | ENSG00000189091 | GGAACACGGCAACTTCCTTA | CAGGGTCATCCAGGTCATTC |
| 225721_at | SYNPO2 | ENSG00000172403 | AGCAGAAGCAGCCCTTACAA | GCTTTCCATGAGCTTGATGAC |
Experiments were performed twice. The amplification protocol was as follows: 1 cycle of 10 minutes at 95°C, 43 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 56°C for 20 seconds, 72°C for 20 seconds, plus an extension at 72°C for 3 minutes. The relative expression value was calculated with the formula 2−ΔΔct.
Statistics
Data from different groups were compared using Student's t test, with Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate as multiple testing correction. Statistical significance was established at P < 0.01 during the unsupervised analysis and P < 0.05 during the supervised analysis. Genes were considered differentially expressed with a fold change >1.5 between the 2 conditions. Gene sets were considered enriched with a P < 0.01 when compared to the reference gene list.
RESULTS
Approximately 54,000 probe sets represented on the Affymetrix chip corresponding to about 33,000 human genes were analyzed. The Affymetrix Microarray Suite (version 5.0) software was used to identify presence calls and to quantify gene expression (see “Materials and Methods”). Affymetrix software assigns to each probe set an absolute call (present, absent, or marginal) that represents a qualitative indication of gene transcription within each sample. According to this flag, the total number of genes expressed in adult liver was determined first. About 14,000 probe sets, corresponding to about 9,500 genes, were never called present in our liver samples; 18,000 probe sets, corresponding to about 13,000 individual genes, were called present in 1 of the 2 conditions: basal and reperfused liver. Among them, about 1,300 genes were not expressed in the BL samples; they are likely to be induced by the ischemia-reperfusion injury. On the other hand, approximately 200 genes expressed in the basal samples were no more expressed in all the RL samples.
Raw expression data were normalized and prefiltered to eliminate unreliable data (see “Materials and Methods”) before performing gene expression differential analysis. Then 28,000 probe sets, corresponding to about 16,000 genes expressed in at least 1 sample, were selected.
Power analysis performed using PowerAtlas software (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL)22 demonstrated that at the threshold 0.01 at which we had chosen to discriminate differentially expressed genes, a sample size of 5 biological replicates per condition corresponded to a true positive probability >92% (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Probabilities of true positive (PTP) differential expressed genes calculated using PowerAtlas Software. The PTP is the expected proportion of genes declared significantly differentially expressed between 2 conditions that are truly differentially expressed between the 2 populations. The graphic shows PTP in the comparison between RL and BL samples across a variety of sample sizes and significance levels. At the significance level cutoff 0.01 (blue line) that we have chosen to discriminate differentially expressed genes, a sample size of 5 biological replicates per condition corresponds to a true positive probability >92%. Red, green, black and yellow lines indicate, respectively, the significance level cut-off of 0.1, 0.05, 0.001 and 1.0E-4 for Student's t test with Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate as multiple testing correction.
Unsupervised Gene Expression Analysis
The early gene expression profile of reperfused livers (RL group) was compared to the basal values (BL group). Based on Student's t test with Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate multiple correction, 420 genes were differentially expressed between the 2 groups with a fold change >2 and P < 0.01. Of them, 12 genes were downregulated and 408 genes were upregulated in RL samples. About 375 more genes were differentially expressed; 65 genes were downregulated in RL and 310 were upregulated with a fold change ranging between 1.5 and 2; therefore the total number of differentially expressed genes, with very high statistical significance, was 795 (Fig. 2). Table 3 reports the 50 most upregulated genes in RL group. The downregulated genes are listed in Table 4. The number of downregulated genes may be underestimated because Affymetrix Microarray Suite 5.0 software may assign the flag absent to a gene either when it is really not expressed or when its expression rate is not reliable. Genes with weak expression often give unreliable results, so they may be discarded from the analysis.

Figure 2. Expression profile of 1,063 probe sets differentially expressed in RL vs. BL samples with P < 0.01. Expression values (normalized log transformed data) of 1,063 probe sets, corresponding to 718 genes upregulated and 77 genes downregulated in reperfused livers, are plotted both per patient and per condition. Basal values are plotted on the left side and values after reperfusion are plotted on the right side. Red lines indicate that genes are upregulated in the RL group vs. the control group, and white lines indicate the downregulated genes. Genes were considered differentially expressed by comparing the mean expression values of RL samples with that of BL samples using Student's t test with Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate, with a P value <0.01, after filtering expression values for noise and unreliable data. TF, liver transplantation; RL, reperfused liver; BL, basal liver.
| Probe Set | Fold Change | P Value | Common name | Genbank | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
| 202768_at | 266.3 | 4.56E-05 | FOSB | NM_006732 | FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog B |
| 205476_at | 77.2 | 0.00113 | CCL20 | NM_004591 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 |
| 215078_at | 39.54 | 0.00125 | SOD2 | AL050388 | Superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrial |
| 36711_at | 38.04 | 0.000133 | MAFF | AL021977 | Human DNA sequence from clone CTA-447C4 |
| 241716_at | 37.33 | 0.00137 | HSPD1 | BF965447 | Heat shock 60kDa protein 1 (chaperonin) |
| 209189_at | 33.1 | 0.00428 | FOS | BC004490 | v-fos FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog |
| 204575_s_at | 26.88 | 0.000381 | MMP19 | U38321 | Matrix metalloproteinase 19 |
| 230494_at | 24.04 | 0.000393 | SLC20A1 | AI671885 | Solute carrier family 20 (phosphate transporter), member 1 |
| 202581_at | 22.8 | 0.000278 | HSPA1B | NM_005346 | Heat shock 70kDa protein 1B |
| 202859_x_at | 22.72 | 0.00126 | IL8 | NM_000584 | Interleukin 8 |
| 202672_s_at | 21.72 | 0.000285 | ATF3 | NM_001674 | Activating transcription factor 3 |
| 202627_s_at | 21.22 | 0.00171 | SERPINE1 | AL574210 | Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade E member 1 |
| 200800_s_at | 19.47 | 0.000304 | HSPA1A | NM_005345 | Heat shock 70kDa protein 1A |
| 202014_at | 18.97 | 0.000399 | PPP1R15A | NM_014330 | Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 15A |
| 218723_s_at | 18.69 | 0.00278 | RGC32 | NM_014059 | Response gene to complement 32 |
| 202643_s_at | 17.91 | 0.000465 | TNFAIP3 | AI738896 | Tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3 |
| 239818_x_at | 17.3 | 0.00277 | TRIB1 | AA576947 | Phosphoprotein regulated by mitogenic pathways |
| 1554333_at | 16.73 | 0.00171 | DNAJA4 | BC031044 | DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily A, member 4 |
| 244753_at | 14.66 | 0.00151 | ACTN4 | BF000430 | Actinin, alpha 4 |
| 204621_s_at | 14.33 | 0.00163 | NR4A2 | AI935096 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 |
| 208744_x_at | 13.56 | 0.000521 | HSPH1 | BG403660 | Heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1 |
| 201324_at | 13.48 | 0.000287 | EMP1 | NM_001423 | Epithelial membrane protein 1 |
| 203821_at | 12.56 | 0.00361 | DTR | NM_001945 | Diphtheria toxin receptor |
| 201464_x_at | 12.16 | 0.000245 | JUN | BG491844 | v-jun sarcoma virus 17 oncogene homolog (avian) |
| 212533_at | 11.92 | 0.00156 | WEE1 | X62048 | WEE1 homolog (S. pombe) |
| 221841_s_at | 11.79 | 0.000372 | KLF4 | BF514079 | Kruppel-like factor 4 (gut) |
| 202340_x_at | 11.58 | 0.00118 | NR4A1 | NM_002135 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 1 |
| 202497_x_at | 11.3 | 0.00185 | SLC2A3 | AI631159 | Solute carrier family 2 member 3 |
| 206115_at | 10.84 | 0.00387 | EGR3 | NM_004430 | Bridging integrator 3 |
| 208891_at | 10.62 | 0.00064 | DUSP6 | BC003143 | Dual specificity phosphatase 6 |
| 204103_at | 10.51 | 0.000304 | CCL4 | NM_002984 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 4 |
| 242726_at | 10.36 | 0.00403 | ACSL3 | BF221850 | Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 3 |
| 226553_at | 10.09 | 0.00215 | TMPRSS2 | AI660243 | Transmembrane protease, serine 2 |
| 217911_s_at | 9.64 | 0.000225 | BAG3 | NM_004281 | BCL2-associated athanogene 3 |
| 205214_at | 9.562 | 0.00373 | STK17B | NM_004226 | Serine/threonine kinase 17b (apoptosis-inducing) |
| 242963_at | 9.5 | 0.00148 | MGC26963 | AI160370 | CDNA FLJ41298 fis, clone BRAMY2040478 |
| 200664_s_at | 9.464 | 0.000225 | DNAJB1 | BG537255 | DNAJB1 |
| 242736_at | 9.445 | 0.00207 | SORBS1 | AI377221 | Sorbin and SH3 domain containing 1 |
| 232017_at | 9.332 | 0.000443 | TJP2 | AK025185 | Homo sapiens cDNA: FLJ21532 fis, clone COL06049. |
| 242727_at | 9.294 | 0.00064 | ARL8 | BG032269 | ADP-ribosylation factor-like 8 |
| 221031_s_at | 9.257 | 0.000234 | DKFZP434F0318 | NM_030817 | Hypothetical protein DKFZp434F0318 |
| 209803_s_at | 9.18 | 0.0012 | PHLDA2 | AF001294 | Pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 2 |
| 208960_s_at | 9.088 | 0.00389 | COPEB | BE675435 | Core promoter element binding protein |
| 202464_s_at | 9.052 | 0.000268 | PFKFB3 | NM_004566 | 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 |
| 206432_at | 8.798 | 0.00217 | HAS2 | NM_005328 | Hyaluronan synthase 2 |
| 205114_s_at | 8.405 | 0.00223 | CCL3 | NM_002983 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 |
| 203068_at | 8.262 | 0.000398 | KIAA0469 | NM_014851 | KIAA0469 |
| 205681_at | 8.186 | 0.00284 | BCL2A1 | NM_004049 | BCL2-related protein A1 |
| 203751_x_at | 8.062 | 0.000465 | JUND | AI762296 | Jun D proto-oncogene |
| 204094_s_at | 7.873 | 0.000972 | KIAA0669 | NM_014779 | Homo sapiens KIAA0669 gene product (KIAA0669), mRNA |
| Probe Set | Fold Change | P Value | Common name | Genbank | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
| 222518_at | 0.661 | 0.00776 | ARFGEF2 | BF525399 | ADP-ribosylation factor guanine nucleotide-exchange factor 2 |
| 200614_at | 0.658 | 0.00373 | CLTC | NM_004859 | Clathrin, heavy polypeptide (Hc) |
| 1555815_a_at | 0.657 | 0.00576 | L3MBTL2 | AL136564 | l(3)mbt-like 2 (Drosophila) |
| 206313_at | 0.651 | 0.0033 | HLA-DOA | NM_002119 | Major histocompatibility complex, class II, DO alpha |
| 217914_at | 0.646 | 0.00925 | TPCN1 | NM_017901 | Two pore segment channel 1 |
| 235471_at | 0.645 | 0.00811 | C10orf72 | BE858464 | 7g29d12.x1 NCI_CGAP_Brn23 |
| 225910_at | 0.644 | 0.00418 | LOC284019 | BF514723 | Helicase with zinc finger domain |
| 226093_at | 0.643 | 0.00723 | DCP1B | AW204088 | Decapping enzyme hDcp1b |
| 204594_s_at | 0.643 | 0.00246 | FLJ20232 | NM_013298 | FLJ20232 |
| 226510_at | 0.642 | 0.00703 | C14orf125 | BF435286 | Chromosome 14 open reading frame 125 |
| 235303_at | 0.641 | 0.00555 | RG9MTD3 | AV728846 | RNA (guanine-9-) methyltransferase domain containing 3 |
| 1566956_at | 0.64 | 0.00985 | OR7E104P | AL137719 | Olfactory receptor, family 7, subfamily E, member 104 pseudogene |
| 242895_x_at | 0.636 | 0.00317 | RNF39 | R63837 | Ring finger protein 39 |
| 205752_s_at | 0.635 | 0.00519 | GSTM5 | NM_000851 | Glutathione S-transferase M5 |
| 209316_s_at | 0.635 | 0.00286 | HBS1L | BC001465 | HBS1-like (S. cerevisiae) |
| 221696_s_at | 0.635 | 0.00894 | STYK1 | AF251059 | Protein kinase STYK1 |
| 227502_at | 0.634 | 0.00304 | FLJ10842 | AV649579 | LCHN protein |
| 216885_s_at | 0.634 | 0.00819 | H326 | AK026481 | Homo sapiens cDNA: FLJ22828 fis, clone KAIA4051 |
| 221063_x_at | 0.632 | 0.00568 | RNF123 | NM_022064 | Ring finger protein 123 |
| 223483_at | 0.627 | 0.00737 | DELGEF | BC000707 | Deafness locus associated putative guanine nucleotide exchange |
| 230214_at | 0.62 | 0.00334 | MRVI1 | AL044056 | Murine retrovirus integration site 1 homolog |
| 1557189_at | 0.616 | 0.00691 | DNASE1 | AW468509 | Deoxyribonuclease I |
| 1557953_at | 0.615 | 0.00712 | ZNF36 | BG761185 | 602718526F1 NIH_MGC_49 |
| 225499_at | 0.614 | 0.0075 | KIAA1272 | AW296194 | Chromosome 20 open reading frame 74 |
| 1556464_a_at | 0.614 | 0.0039 | LOC257407 | AF086098 | Hypothetical protein LOC257407 |
| 202607_at | 0.614 | 0.00983 | NDST1 | AL526632 | AL526632 Homo sapiens NEUROBLASTOMA COT 25-NORMAL |
| 224686_x_at | 0.611 | 0.0093 | LOC474170 | AA045233 | FLJ34306 protein/// Hypothetical LOC388397 |
| 221871_s_at | 0.61 | 0.00644 | TFG | BF057492 | TRK-fused gene |
| 202288_at | 0.609 | 0.00801 | FRAP1 | U88966 | FK506 binding protein 12-rapamycin associated protein 1 |
| 201620_at | 0.609 | 0.00738 | MBTPS1 | NM_003791 | Membrane-bound transcription factor protease, site 1 |
| 217902_s_at | 0.607 | 0.00571 | HERC2 | NM_004667 | Hect domain and RLD 2 |
| 219320_at | 0.604 | 0.00532 | MYOHD1 | NM_025109 | Myosin head domain containing 1 |
| 223760_s_at | 0.604 | 0.00311 | RAB7 | AF119891 | Predicted protein of HQ2706; Homo sapiens PRO2706 mRNA |
| 49452_at | 0.602 | 0.00243 | LOC283445 | AI057637 | Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase beta |
| 212880_at | 0.6 | 0.00894 | WDR7 | AB011113 | WD repeat domain 7 |
| 202204_s_at | 0.596 | 0.00489 | AMFR | AF124145 | Autocrine motility factor receptor |
| 1552279_a_at | 0.593 | 0.000972 | MGC9564 | AK074161 | Sterile alpha and TIR motif containing 1 |
| 204691_x_at | 0.59 | 0.00323 | PLA2G6 | NM_003560 | Phospholipase A2, group VI (cytosolic, calcium-independent) |
| 219245_s_at | 0.589 | 0.00311 | FLJ13491 | AI309636 | Hypothetical protein FLJ13491 |
| 223351_at | 0.589 | 0.00137 | HLC-8 | N21028 | yx46f01.s1 Soares melanocyte 2NbHM |
| 1565641_at | 0.578 | 0.00321 | C16orf45 | BE503823 | Chromosome 16 open reading frame 45 |
| 205601_s_at | 0.577 | 0.00492 | HOXB5 | NM_002147 | Homeo box B5 |
| 229223_at | 0.576 | 0.00784 | NFATC3 | AI038402 | Nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dep |
| 226450_at | 0.574 | 0.00874 | INSR | AV703054 | Insulin receptor |
| 242759_at | 0.573 | 0.00762 | ZFP64 | AI821726 | Zinc finger protein 64 homolog (mouse) |
| 228456_s_at | 0.572 | 0.00283 | LOC149832 | AU151357 | Clone IMAGE:5729395, mRNA |
| 225509_at | 0.57 | 0.00516 | LOC56757 | AI862477 | Hypothetical protein FLJ11526 |
| 218873_at | 0.568 | 0.00514 | FLJ20203 | NM_017710 | Synonyms: FLJ12923, FLJ23040, KIAA1606, DKFZp761I241 |
| 217225_x_at | 0.566 | 0.00284 | LOC283820 | AL512687 | Hypothetical protein LOC283820 |
| 200637_s_at | 0.566 | 0.00285 | PTPRF | AI762627 | Protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, F |
| 205783_at | 0.564 | 0.00995 | KLK13 | NM_015596 | Kallikrein 13 |
| 1566646_at | 0.563 | 0.00982 | LOC149086 | AK057562 | Hypothetical protein LOC149086 |
| 1560198_at | 0.554 | 0.00278 | C14orf70 | AV701600 | AV701600 ADB Homo sapiens cDNA clone ADBCWF03 5′ |
| 225065_x_at | 0.548 | 0.00206 | MGC40157 | AI826279 | wk33e07.x1 NCI_CGAP_Pr22 3′ |
| 211973_at | 0.548 | 0.00137 | NUDT3 | AW341200 | Nudix (nucleoside diphosphate linked moiety X)-type motif 3 |
| 214955_at | 0.543 | 0.00243 | TMPRSS6 | AI912086 | Transmembrane serine protease 6 |
| 225115_at | 0.541 | 0.00679 | HIPK2 | BF529628 | Homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 |
| 228688_at | 0.538 | 0.00838 | PSMD7 | AA843726 | Transcribed sequence with strong similarity prf:2111281A |
| 239586_at | 0.534 | 0.00568 | BJ-TSA-9 | AA085776 | Hypothetical protein MGC14128 |
| 225504_at | 0.534 | 0.00698 | FLJ21616 | AW294031 | Hypothetical protein FLJ21616 |
| 203279_at | 0.525 | 0.00613 | EDEM1 | NM_014674 | EDEM1 |
| 230888_at | 0.519 | 0.00264 | HSPC049 | AW300278 | HSPC049 protein |
| 236153_at | 0.517 | 0.00223 | SUHW4 | BF447323 | Suppressor of hairy wing homolog 4 (Drosophila) |
| 227319_at | 0.51 | 0.00308 | C16orf44 | AI693862 | Chromosome 16 open reading frame 44 |
| 160020_at | 0.503 | 0.00506 | MMP14 | Z48481 | Matrix metalloproteinase 14 (membrane-inserted) |
| 203656_at | 0.484 | 0.00238 | KIAA0274 | NM_014845 | KIAA0274 |
| 228287_at | 0.477 | 0.00172 | ING5 | BG054893 | Inhibitor of growth family, member 5 |
| 231304_at | 0.471 | 0.00307 | PPP3R2 | AI936596 | Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl-D-aspartate 3A |
| 200688_at | 0.463 | 0.00342 | SF3B3 | D13642 | Splicing factor 3b, subunit 3, 130kDa |
| 218019_s_at | 0.459 | 0.00304 | C21orf97 | NM_021941 | Chromosome 21 open reading frame 97 |
| 1552568_at | 0.45 | 0.00114 | TMEM7 | NM_031440 | Transmembrane protein 7 |
| 224653_at | 0.444 | 0.000245 | EIF4EBP2 | U88989 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 2 |
| 200617_at | 0.392 | 0.003 | KIAA0152 | NM_014730 | Go_component: integral to membrane [goid 0016021] |
| 226495_at | 0.379 | 0.00349 | KIAA1271 | BE727883 | 601564286F1 NIH_MGC_20. |
| 200784_s_at | 0.341 | 0.000225 | LRP1 | BF304759 | Low density lipoprotein-related protein 1 |
| 201729_s_at | 0.297 | 0.00258 | KIAA0100 | NM_014680 | KIAA0100 |
Considering the list of 408 genes upregulated in RL group with a fold change >2 and P < 0.01, 74 GO categories for molecular process were relatively enriched when compared with the complete Affymetrix chip gene set, with a ratio >2 between observed and expected values. Seven categories were relatively enriched in the list of 77 downregulated genes. Table 5 reports the observed and the expected gene numbers in these lists.
| Upregulated Genes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO Categories | Observed | Expected | Ratio | Significance |
| ||||
| Circadian rhythm | 4 | 0.40 | 10.00 | 0.000524 |
| Response to protein stimulus | 10 | 1.19 | 8.40 | 0.000000 |
| Response to unfolded protein | 10 | 1.19 | 8.40 | 0.000000 |
| Positive regulation of cell differentiation | 4 | 0.50 | 8.00 | 0.001368 |
| Actin filament organization | 4 | 0.58 | 6.90 | 0.002425 |
| Negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter | 11 | 1.75 | 6.29 | 0.000001 |
| Rhythmic process | 5 | 0.80 | 6.25 | 0.001045 |
| Positive regulation of development | 4 | 0.72 | 5.56 | 0.005244 |
| Angiogenesis | 9 | 1.62 | 5.56 | 0.000030 |
| Blood vessel morphogenesis | 9 | 1.70 | 5.29 | 0.000044 |
| Vasculature development | 9 | 1.70 | 5.29 | 0.000044 |
| Blood vessel development | 9 | 1.70 | 5.29 | 0.000044 |
| Regulation of cell adhesion | 5 | 0.98 | 5.10 | 0.002749 |
| Regulation of MAPK activity | 7 | 1.38 | 5.07 | 0.000412 |
| JAK-STAT cascade | 4 | 0.80 | 5.00 | 0.007696 |
| Anti-apoptosis | 15 | 3.07 | 4.89 | 0.000000 |
| Negative regulation of apoptosis | 17 | 3.55 | 4.79 | 0.000000 |
| Negative regulation of programmed cell death | 17 | 3.58 | 4.75 | 0.000000 |
| Cell cycle arrest | 8 | 1.70 | 4.71 | 0.000270 |
| Negative regulation of transcription\. DNA-dependent | 13 | 2.81 | 4.63 | 0.000004 |
| Regulation of kinase activity | 14 | 3.31 | 4.23 | 0.000005 |
| Regulation of protein kinase activity | 14 | 3.31 | 4.23 | 0.000005 |
| Regulation of transferase activity | 14 | 3.34 | 4.19 | 0.000006 |
| Positive regulation of protein kinase activity | 6 | 1.46 | 4.11 | 0.003209 |
| Positive regulation of transferase activity | 6 | 1.48 | 4.05 | 0.003516 |
| Negative regulation of signal transduction | 6 | 1.51 | 3.97 | 0.003844 |
| Negative regulation of transcription | 15 | 4.16 | 3.61 | 0.000018 |
| Taxis | 11 | 3.13 | 3.51 | 0.000290 |
| Chemotaxis | 11 | 3.13 | 3.51 | 0.000290 |
| Regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter | 24 | 6.92 | 3.47 | 0.000000 |
| Regulation of apoptosis | 30 | 8.72 | 3.44 | 0.000000 |
| Regulation of programmed cell death | 30 | 8.77 | 3.42 | 0.000000 |
| Negative regulation of nucleobase\. nucleoside\. nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism | 15 | 4.40 | 3.41 | 0.000034 |
| Negative regulation of cellular metabolism | 17 | 4.98 | 3.41 | 0.000010 |
| Locomotory behavior | 11 | 3.26 | 3.37 | 0.000416 |
| Negative regulation of cellular physiological process | 53 | 16.04 | 3.30 | 0.000000 |
| Apoptosis | 43 | 13.28 | 3.24 | 0.000000 |
| Programmed cell death | 43 | 13.33 | 3.23 | 0.000000 |
| Cell death | 45 | 14.02 | 3.21 | 0.000000 |
| Regulation of cell growth | 9 | 2.81 | 3.20 | 0.001981 |
| Negative regulation of progression through cell cycle | 13 | 4.06 | 3.20 | 0.000212 |
| Death | 45 | 14.07 | 3.20 | 0.000000 |
| Negative regulation of physiological process | 53 | 16.67 | 3.18 | 0.000000 |
| Negative regulation of cellular process | 56 | 17.78 | 3.15 | 0.000000 |
| Transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter | 38 | 12.14 | 3.13 | 0.000000 |
| Negative regulation of cell proliferation | 12 | 3.90 | 3.08 | 0.000531 |
| Cell growth | 11 | 3.60 | 3.06 | 0.000971 |
| Regulation of cell size | 11 | 3.60 | 3.06 | 0.000971 |
| Negative regulation of biological process | 58 | 19.22 | 3.02 | 0.000000 |
| MAPKKK cascade | 7 | 2.33 | 3.00 | 0.008717 |
| Induction of apoptosis | 11 | 3.74 | 2.94 | 0.001305 |
| Induction of programmed cell death | 11 | 3.74 | 2.94 | 0.001305 |
| Regulation of growth | 9 | 3.07 | 2.93 | 0.003657 |
| Response to chemical stimulus | 25 | 8.61 | 2.90 | 0.000002 |
| Negative regulation of metabolism | 17 | 5.88 | 2.89 | 0.000086 |
| Regulation of enzyme activity | 17 | 5.99 | 2.84 | 0.000107 |
| Inflammatory response | 15 | 5.33 | 2.81 | 0.000296 |
| Growth | 12 | 4.45 | 2.70 | 0.001711 |
| Regulation of cell proliferation | 20 | 7.45 | 2.68 | 0.000058 |
| Positive regulation of cell proliferation | 9 | 3.37 | 2.67 | 0.006613 |
| Positive regulation of apoptosis | 11 | 4.16 | 2.64 | 0.003060 |
| Positive regulation of programmed cell death | 11 | 4.19 | 2.63 | 0.003213 |
| Response to abiotic stimulus | 26 | 10.10 | 2.57 | 0.000009 |
| Cell motility | 15 | 5.88 | 2.55 | 0.000840 |
| Localization of cell | 15 | 5.88 | 2.55 | 0.000840 |
| Locomotion | 15 | 5.88 | 2.55 | 0.000840 |
| Protein kinase cascade | 18 | 7.08 | 2.54 | 0.000268 |
| Regulation of signal transduction | 13 | 5.41 | 2.40 | 0.003071 |
| Behavior | 12 | 5.04 | 2.38 | 0.004700 |
| Response to wounding | 23 | 9.67 | 2.38 | 0.000107 |
| Regulation of progression through cell cycle | 26 | 11.42 | 2.28 | 0.000078 |
| Regulation of cell cycle | 26 | 11.45 | 2.27 | 0.000081 |
| Cell proliferation | 29 | 13.36 | 2.17 | 0.000070 |
| Cellular morphogenesis | 14 | 6.57 | 2.13 | 0.006355 |
| Downregulated Genes | ||||
| GO categories | Observed | Expected | Ratio | Significance |
| Catabolism | 9 | 1.96 | 4.59 | 0.00011129 |
| Cellular catabolism | 7 | 1.67 | 4.19 | 0.00120548 |
| Cellular protein metabolism | 17 | 9.15 | 1.86 | 0.00492348 |
| Cellular macromolecule metabolism | 17 | 9.32 | 1.82 | 0.00598653 |
| Biopolymer metabolism | 16 | 8.84 | 1.81 | 0.00874002 |
| Protein metabolism | 18 | 10.01 | 1.80 | 0.00517154 |
| Macromolecule metabolism | 23 | 13.84 | 1.66 | 0.00304722 |
| Primary metabolism | 32 | 22.77 | 1.41 | 0.00318918 |
More than 700 genes expressed in adult liver are likely to not be affected by the ischemia-reperfusion process, because their expression is significantly homogeneous (fold change <1.1) in the 2 conditions.
Supervised Gene Expression Analysis
Next, the analysis addressed genes involved in pathways already investigated in the physiopathology of IRI. The genes involved in the apoptotic process were investigated in order to identify genes whose expression is modulated during ischemia-reperfusion. The HG-U133A Plus 2.0 chip contains about 1,000 probe sets, corresponding to about 600 genes, related to apoptosis. Seventy-two apoptosis related genes may be considered early genes in the IRI process, as they are regulated after 2 hours of reperfusion with a fold change >1.5 and P < 0.05. Three of them are downregulated. The complete list of these genes is reported in Table 6.
| Probe Set | P Value | Fold Change | Common Name | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| 201466_s_at | 0.00748 | 21.83 | JUN | v-jun sarcoma virus 17 oncogene homolog (avian) |
| 202014_at | 0.00063 | 18.97 | PPP1R15A | Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 15A |
| 202643_s_at | 0.000783 | 17.91 | TNFAIP3 | Tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3 |
| 208891_at | 0.00103 | 10.62 | DUSP6 | Dual specificity phosphatase 6 |
| 217911_s_at | 0.000171 | 9.64 | BAG3 | BCL2-associated athanogene 3 |
| 205214_at | 0.00827 | 9.562 | STK17B | Serine/threonine kinase 17b (apoptosis-inducing) |
| 205681_at | 0.00649 | 8.186 | BCL2A1 | BCL2-related protein A1 |
| 217997_at | 0.00191 | 7.719 | PHLDA1 | Pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 1 |
| 202431_s_at | 0.0028 | 7.607 | MYC | v-myc myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (avian) |
| 39402_at | 0.0152 | 7.392 | IL1B | Interleukin 1, beta |
| 200798_x_at | 0.000171 | 6.484 | MCL1 | Myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 (BCL2-related) |
| 210655_s_at | 0.0256 | 5.604 | FOXO3A | Forkhead box O3A |
| 201502_s_at | 0.000171 | 5.571 | NFKBIA | Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, alpha |
| 218368_s_at | 0.00514 | 5.342 | TNFRSF12A | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12A |
| 207574_s_at | 0.000171 | 5.143 | GADD45B | Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, beta |
| 201631_s_at | 0.00595 | 4.78 | IER3 | Immediate early response 3 |
| 203725_at | 0.0011 | 4.63 | GADD45A | Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, alpha |
| 203120_at | 0.00335 | 4.59 | TP53BP2 | Tumor protein p53 binding protein, 2 |
| 221009_s_at | 0.0028 | 4.434 | ANGPTL4 | Angiopoietin-like 4 |
| 202284_s_at | 0.00133 | 4.383 | CDKN1A | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21, Cip1) |
| 236402_at | 0.0424 | 3.776 | BRAF | v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 |
| 209308_s_at | 0.000852 | 3.523 | BNIP2 | BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19kDa interacting protein 2 |
| 227345_at | 0.00149 | 3.514 | TNFRSF10D | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 10d, decoy with truncated death domain |
| 204121_at | 0.0161 | 3.323 | GADD45G | Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, gamma |
| 226525_at | 0.0409 | 3.283 | STK17B | yz03f02.s1 Soares_multiple_sclerosis_2NbHMSP Homo sapiens |
| 238509_at | 0.0156 | 3.271 | CUL1 | cullin 1 |
| 202724_s_at | 0.00514 | 3.053 | FOXO1A | Forkhead box O1A (rhabdomyosarcoma) |
| 243664_at | 0.0142 | 2.942 | TXNL | Thioredoxin-like, 32kDa |
| 208309_s_at | 0.0297 | 2.778 | MALT1 | Mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation gene 1 |
| 209545_s_at | 0.00178 | 2.771 | RIPK2 | Receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 2 |
| 239629_at | 0.0042 | 2.735 | CFLAR | CASP8 and FADD-like apoptosis regulator |
| 231775_at | 0.0254 | 2.7 | TNFRSF10A | zd33e01.r1 Soares_fetal_heart_NbHH19W Homo sapiens cDNA clone IMAGE:342456 5′ similar to contains Alu repetitive element;, mRNA sequence. |
| 227558_at | 0.0376 | 2.668 | CBX4 | Chromobox homolog 4 (Pc class homolog, Drosophila) |
| 206665_s_at | 0.0409 | 2.63 | BCL2L1 | BCL2-like 1 |
| 213596_at | 0.00514 | 2.608 | CASP4 | Caspase 4, apoptosis-related cysteine protease |
| 230499_at | 0.00178 | 2.544 | BIRC3 | Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 3 |
| 205263_at | 0.0191 | 2.497 | BCL10 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 10 |
| 212312_at | 0.0177 | 2.492 | COX4I2 | |
| 211919_s_at | 0.00824 | 2.485 | CXCR4 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 |
| 210405_x_at | 0.00576 | 2.411 | TNFRSF10B | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 10b |
| 209239_at | 0.00119 | 2.37 | NFKB1 | Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1 (p105) |
| 202693_s_at | 0.0282 | 2.333 | STK17A | Serine/threonine kinase 17a (apoptosis-inducing) |
| 222728_s_at | 0.0297 | 2.332 | MGC5306 | NB4 apoptosis/ differentiation related protein; Homo sapiens PNAS-104 |
| 205192_at | 0.0222 | 2.33 | MAP3K14 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 14 |
| 229519_at | 0.00514 | 2.264 | FXR1 | Fragile X mental retardation, autosomal homolog 1 |
| 201739_at | 0.0161 | 2.258 | SGK | Serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase |
| 202076_at | 0.0131 | 2.177 | BIRC2 | Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 2 |
| 218088_s_at | 0.00514 | 2.167 | RRAGC | Ras-related GTP binding C |
| 204005_s_at | 0.0382 | 2.028 | PAWR | PRKC, apoptosis, WT1, regulator |
| 201375_s_at | 0.0234 | 2.014 | PPP2CB | Protein phosphatase 2 (formerly 2A), catalytic subunit, beta isoform |
| 208652_at | 0.00756 | 2.012 | PPP2CA | Protein phosphatase 2 (formerly 2A), catalytic subunit, alpha isoform |
| 225434_at | 0.0131 | 2.003 | DEDD2 | Death effector domain containing 2 |
| 214499_s_at | 0.00654 | 1.925 | BCLAF1 | BCL2-associated transcription factor 1 |
| 200608_s_at | 0.041 | 1.902 | RAD21 | RAD21 homolog (S. pombe) |
| 222985_at | 0.0134 | 1.879 | YWHAG | Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein |
| 231809_x_at | 0.0191 | 1.867 | PDCD7 | EST365840 MAGE resequences, MAGC Homo sapiens cDNA, mRNA sequence. |
| 209941_at | 0.025 | 1.821 | RIPK1 | Receptor (TNFRSF)-interacting serine-threonine kinase 1 |
| 210792_x_at | 0.0299 | 1.816 | SIVA | CD27-binding (Siva) protein |
| 200071_at | 0.025 | 1.801 | SMNDC1 | Survival motor neuron domain containing 1 |
| 208905_at | 0.00819 | 1.69 | CYCS | Cytochrome c, somatic |
| 202886_s_at | 0.0146 | 1.596 | PPP2R1B | Protein phosphatase 2 (formerly 2A), regulatory subunit A (PR 65), beta isoform |
| 222158_s_at | 0.0278 | 1.585 | PNAS-4 | CGI-146 protein |
| 212373_at | 0.025 | 1.582 | FEM1B | fem-1 homolog b (C. elegans) |
| 213026_at | 0.0225 | 1.561 | APG12L | APG12 autophagy 12-like (S. cerevisiae) |
| 221478_at | 0.0297 | 1.558 | BNIP3L | BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19kDa interacting protein 3-like |
| 204780_s_at | 0.0409 | 1.552 | TNFRSF6 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 6 |
| 201149_s_at | 0.0142 | 1.528 | TIMP3 | Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (Sorsby fundus dystrophy, pseudoinflammatory) |
| 210101_x_at | 0.0316 | 1.507 | SH3GLB1 | SH3-domain GRB2-like endophilin B1 |
| 212401_s_at | 0.00748 | 1.505 | CDC2L1 | Cell division cycle 2-like 2 |
| 1553178_a_at | 0.0297 | 0.639 | SSTR3 | Somatostatin receptor 3 |
| 205488_at | 0.024 | 0.632 | GZMA | Granzyme A (granzyme 1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated serine esterase 3) |
| 210685_s_at | 0.00649 | 0.564 | UBE4B | Ubiquitination factor E4B (UFD2 homolog, yeast) |
Genes related to the inflammatory response and heat shock genes were also analyzed. Spotted on the HG133 Plus 2.0 chip are 195 probe sets related to inflammatory response. They correspond to 132 genes, 17 of which are differentially expressed, upregulated or downregulated, and mostly chemokines CC and CXC and interleukins 1 and 8 (Table 7). Other interleukins are not significantly regulated after IRI.
| Probe set | P Value | Fold Change | Common Name | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 203140_at | 0.00104 | 2.283 | BCL6 | B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6 (zinc finger protein 51) |
| 207655_s_at | 0.0218 | 1.811 | BLNK | B-cell linker |
| 205476_at | 0.00211 | 77.2 | CCL20 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 |
| 205114_s_at | 0.00534 | 8.405 | CCL3 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 |
| 204103_at | 0.000866 | 10.51 | CCL4 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 4 |
| 209774_x_at | 0.00161 | 2.194 | CXCL2 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2 |
| 206336_at | 0.0267 | 2.481 | CXCL6 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 6 (granulocyte chemotactic protein 2) |
| 211919_s_at | 0.0114 | 2.485 | CXCR4 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 |
| 221664_s_at | 0.0425 | 1.782 | F11R | F11 receptor |
| 209189_at | 0.0127 | 33.1 | FOS | v-fos FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog |
| 205119_s_at | 0.00295 | 3.477 | FPR1 | Formyl peptide receptor 1 |
| 39402_at | 0.0181 | 7.392 | IL1B | Interleukin 1, beta |
| 207008_at | 0.0127 | 3.103 | IL8RB | Interleukin 8 receptor, beta |
| 206157_at | 0.04 | 4.588 | PTX3 | Pentaxin-related gene, rapidly induced by IL-1 beta |
| 209545_s_at | 0.00211 | 2.771 | RIPK2 | Receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 2 |
| 204924_at | 0.0212 | 1.897 | TLR2 | Toll-like receptor 2 |
| 202859_x_at | 0.0002 | 40.8 | IL8 | Interleukin 8 |
For heat shock genes, 261 probe sets that correspond to 180 genes have been tested. Twenty-six genes are differentially expressed between BL and RL samples with a fold change >1.5 and P < 0.05. They are all upregulated except for the heat shock protein HSPC049 gene, which that is 2-fold downregulated in RL samples. The list of these genes is reported in Table 8.
| Probe Set | P Value | Fold Change | Common Name | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 202581_at | 0.0004 | 22.8 | HSPA1B | Heat shock 70kDa protein 1B |
| 200800_s_at | 0.0004 | 19.47 | HSPA1A | Heat shock 70kDa protein 1A |
| 208744_x_at | 0.0006 | 13.56 | HSPH1 | Heat shock 105kDa/110kDa protein 1 |
| 207714_s_at | 0.0183 | 10.67 | SERPINH1 | CBP1, CBP2; collagen-binding protein 1 |
| 1554334_a_at | 0.0006 | 9.787 | DNAJA4 | DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily A, member 4 |
| 200666_s_at | 0.0004 | 7.331 | DNAJB1 | DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 1 |
| 213418_at | 0.0115 | 7.044 | HSPA6 | Heat shock 70kDa protein 6 (HSP70B') |
| 203811_s_at | 0.0042 | 4.073 | DNAJB4 | DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 4 |
| 219343_at | 0.0052 | 3.626 | CDC37L1 | Hsp90-associating relative of Cdc37 |
| 201841_s_at | 0.0151 | 3.247 | HSPB1 | Heat shock 27kDa protein 1 |
| 210211_s_at | 0.0151 | 2.589 | HSPCA | Heat shock 90kDa protein 1, alpha |
| 213330_s_at | 0.0372 | 2.518 | STIP1 | Stress-induced-phosphoprotein 1 (Hsp70/Hsp90-organizprotein) |
| 200881_s_at | 0.0151 | 2.252 | DNAJA1 | DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily A, member 1 |
| 218936_s_at | 0.0325 | 2.209 | HSPC128 | HSPC128 protein |
| 208811_s_at | 0.0119 | 2.165 | DNAJB6 | DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 6 |
| 214328_s_at | 0.0184 | 2.133 | HSPCA | Transcribed sequences |
| 200064_at | 0.0142 | 2.127 | HSPCB | Heat shock 90kDa protein 1, beta |
| 202843_at | 0.0325 | 2.117 | DNAJB9 | DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 9 |
| 223486_at | 0.0372 | 2.007 | HSPC135 | HSPC135 protein |
| 200806_s_at | 0.0325 | 1.93 | HSPD1 | Transcribed sequence with strong similarity to protein pir:A32800 |
| 205133_s_at | 0.0372 | 1.833 | HSPE1 | Heat shock 10kDa protein 1 (chaperonin 10) |
| 223271_s_at | 0.0303 | 1.772 | HSPC129 | Hypothetical protein HSPC129 |
| 208815_x_at | 0.0134 | 1.629 | HSPA4 | Heat shock 70kDa protein 4 |
| 218728_s_at | 0.0368 | 1.542 | HSPC163 | HSPC163 protein |
| 230888_at | 0.0055 | 0.519 | HSPC049 | HSPC049 protein |
| 203665_at | 0.0123 | 0.512 | HMOX1 | Heme oxygenase (decycling) 1, HO-1 |
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis on 14 genes was carried out to verify the results of microarray analysis. The genes were chosen as follows: 10 genes upregulated in RL group, 2 downregulated genes, and 2 normoregulated genes. The results confirm the microarray data for these genes (Table 9). Correlation rates between quantitative real-time PCR and microarray data were satisfactory for all the tested genes (r > 0.85) except for the homeobox B5 gene, which is downregulated in RL according to microarray data and normoregulated according to real-time PCR.
| Probe Set | Gene Description | RL/BL Microarray | RL/BLqPCR |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 202076_at | Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 2 (BIRC2) | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 230499_at | Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 3 (BIRC3) | 2.5 | 11.8 |
| 201236_s_at | BTG family, member 2 (BTG2) | 2.4 | 6.0 |
| 227558_at | Chromobox homolog 4 (Pc class homolog, Drosophila) (CBX4) | 2.7 | 2.5 |
| 206432_at | Hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2) | 8.8 | 34.2 |
| 205601_s_at | Homeobox B5 (HOXB5) | 0.6 | 1.1 |
| 215485_s_at | Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (CD54), human rhinovirus receptor (ICAM1) | 2.0 | 11.0 |
| 228287_at | Inhibitor of growth family, member 5 (ING5) | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| 202068_s_at | Low density lipoprotein receptor (familial hypercholesterolemia) (LDLR) | 8.7 | 11.3 |
| 205192_at | Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 14 (MAP3K14) | 2.3 | 3.3 |
| 209239_at | Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1 (p105) (NFKB1) | 2.3 | 2.0 |
| 202464_s_at | 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) | 9.0 | 5.6 |
| 200688_at | Splicing factor 3b, subunit 3, 130kDa (SF3B3) | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| 225721_at | Synaptopodin 2 (SYNPO2) | 0.8 | 1.2 |
DISCUSSION
A total of 795 genes whose expression is significantly modified by ischemia-reperfusion in human liver have been identified during transplantation of livers from cadaveric donors. All of them are early-responding genes, as their expression is significantly altered within 3 hours after reperfusion. The analysis of the enriched GO categories for biological processes in the list of upregulated genes showed a very significant presence of genes involved in signal transduction, intracellular signaling cascade, Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of the transcriptors (JAK-STAT) and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity, apoptosis induction and regulation, cell death, and cell growth. Many genes included in the group of significantly upregulated genes are likely to be completely activated by IRI, as these genes are not expressed at all in the basal samples.
We compared our data with data previously obtained by Borozan et al.10 during living donor transplantation. The authors analyzed 19,000 complementary DNA clones, identifying a set of genes whose expression is impaired in acute but not in chronic liver stress. They demonstrated that 2 hours after reperfusion of transplanted liver, 125 genes were at least 2-fold upregulated and 106 were downregulated with P < 0.01 when compared with basal gene expression. Even though experimental conditions are different, as we considered livers from cadaveric donors instead of living donors and our ischemia times were far longer, our data showed 90% agreement (95/125) with the list of upregulated genes. In particular, when we considered the list of 25 most dysregulated genes that the authors confirmed by real-time PCR, the agreement was quite complete for the upregulated genes. The genes downregulated after reperfusion showed a similar fold change but with poor significance in our data (Table 10). We hypothesize that the expression of many downregulated genes was already impaired in basal samples at BL, as we began our analysis with cadaveric livers.
| Probe Set | Fold Change, Borozan et al. | Fold Change, Our Data | P Value, Our Data | Common Name | GenBank Acc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
| Upregulated Genes | |||||
| 202284_s_at | 6.85 | 4.383 | 0.000136 | CDKN1A | NM_000389 |
| 224654_at | 6.54 | 3.228 | 0.000226 | DDX21 | BG164358 |
| 209457_at | 3.83 | 7.78 | 4.53E-05 | DUSP5 | U16996 |
| 232174_at | 3.82 | 5.155 | 0.000977 | EXT1 | AA480392 |
| 202768_at | 3.39 | 266 | 1.70E-07 | FOSB | NM_006732 |
| 208785_s_at | 3.84 | 2.476 | 1.00E-05 | MAP1LC3B | BE893893 |
| 210524_x_at | 3.51 | 1.597 | 0.202 | MT1F | AF078844 |
| 236495_at | 8.05 | 3.476 | 0.000549 | PBEF1 | AI681868 |
| 202071_at | 3.4 | 2.911 | 0.001 | SDC4 | NM_002999 |
| 211573_x_at | 4.73 | 1.463 | 0.213 | TGM2 | M98478 |
| 235086_at | 5.77 | 8.078 | 0.00231 | THBS1 | AW956580 |
| 215033_at | 15.3 | 13.29 | 0.00468 | TM4SF1 | AI189753 |
| Downregulated Genes | |||||
| 229229_at | 0.26 | 0.907 | 0.626 | AGXT2 | AJ292204 |
| 206913_at | 0.14 | 1.913 | 0.113 | BAAT | NM_001701 |
| 1554931_at | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.168 | CYP4A11 | BC022851 |
| 206930_at | 0.3 | 0.807 | 0.661 | GLYAT | NM_005838 |
| 1554303_at | 0.34 | 0.599 | 0.201 | HNMT | AF523356 |
| 1562089_at | 0.23 | 0.73 | 0.569 | MGC15937 | BC013929 |
| 240370_at | 0.33 | 0.722 | 0.54 | PKD2 | AI432451 |
| 1558027_s_at | 0.34 | 0.615 | 0.0376 | PRKAB2 | AL552001 |
| 205790_at | 0.32 | 0.742 | 0.0796 | SCAP1 | NM_003726 |
| 205152_at | 0.3 | 1.259 | 0.531 | SLC6A1 | AI003579 |
| 203868_s_at | 0.34 | 0.973 | 0.911 | VCAM1 | NM_001078 |
The supervised gene expression analysis revealed that 12% of the genes involved in the apoptotic process are differentially expressed in RL samples vs. BL samples. They are mostly upregulated except for the somatostatin receptor 3, the granzyme A, and the ubiquitination factor E4B, which are downregulated after reperfusion. The 72 upregulated genes are subdivided as follows: 41 proapoptotic genes, 31 antiapoptotic genes.
The 12.5% of the genes involved in the inflammatory process were induced by IRI. The most upregulated genes in this category encoded for chemotactic agents like C-C chemokines cystein cistein ligand (CCL) CCL4, and CCL20. Interleukin (IL) 1 and IL-8 were more than 5-fold upregulated. These results agree with the published data in mouse lung ischemia-reperfusion previously reported by Yamane.23 IL-1 is a strong inducer of hepatic chemokine synthesis.24 CXC chemokines recruit neutrophils into the reperfused liver due to their strong chemotactic activity. There is a strong activation of IL-6 gene in human liver. This result confirms the previous data obtained in lung experiments. The IL-6 receptor and the IL-6 signal transducer are deeply upregulated. IL-6 is an antiinflammatory citokine, as it can downregulate the tumor necrosis factorα. Its expression in liver is completely induced by IRI, as IL-6 is not expressed at all in the basal samples.
The activation of genes encoding for heat shock protein (HSP) is also in agreement with previously reported data.25 About 22.5% of the heat shock genes were differentially expressed in the 2 tested conditions. The most upregulated genes were HSP70, HSP105 and HSP90. HSPs are mostly molecular chaperons. They have already been used to evaluate IRI in rat liver.26
HSP induction can reduce the nuclear binding of proinflammatory transcription factors27 and increase the antioxidant power of cells.28 HSP and HO-1 are considered to be key factors in protection because of their preconditioning mechanisms such as ischemic and heat shock preconditioning.29 HO-1 was about 2-fold upregulated in samples after reperfusion. HO-1 degrades heme into carbon monoxide, iron, and biliverdin and is ubiquitously distributed in mammalian tissues. HO-1 is strongly and rapidly induced by a variety of stimuli and agents that cause oxidative stress under pathological conditions. Increased HO-1 expression has been proposed to reduce inducible nitric oxide synthase activity through accelerated degradation of heme thereby exerting a protective effect in animal models of inflammation.
The comparison between these data and data from literature confirms the activation of the adhesion molecule intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM1). Other adhesion molecules induced by IRI in our liver samples were chemotactic factors such as interleukin-8 (IL-8) and CCL4 and angiogenic inducers such as the cystein-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61) and the tumor necrosis factor receptor 12A and integrins such as beta-1 integrins. It is known that interaction between integrins and other adhesion molecules is responsible for the process of extravasation of neutrophils, a crucial prerequisite for hepatocyte damage.30 Inhibiting adhesion molecules production should be helpful in reducing leukocyte adhesion to vasal endothelium and therefore cell injury consequent to this event.
Pathway analysis of all of the differential expressed genes, performed using the Pathway Express software (Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI), revealed a possible orderly sequence of gene activation in the dysregulated pathways. Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction pathway was one of the most altered pathways, as 38 out of 229 genes represented on the chip are upregulated in RL samples, including IL-8 (22-fold upregulated) and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 and 4 and IL-6 and -1 (more than 7-fold upregulated). This pathway regulates the focal adhesion pathway (dysregulated with 28/155 upregulated genes) that in turn may influence 3 other pathways: WNT signaling, apoptosis, and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways (all dysregulated with 23/128, 21/92, and 52/232 upregulated genes in RL, respectively). These 3 pathways cooperate to induce cyclin D2 expression, regulating the cell cycle pathway and therefore promoting the liver regeneration process. Cyclin D2, indeed, is more than 2-fold upregulated in RL samples. In this manner, quiescent hepatocytes are induced to reenter the cell cycle, also stimulated by IL-6. Induction of the liver regeneration process is demonstrated the upregulation of MYC, JUND, JUNB, FOS, and FOSB genes, already identified during an early G1 phase of cell cycle in the regenerating liver.31 These genes are highly expressed in RL samples together with other genes upregulated in G1 such as DUSP6 and the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21 (CDKN1A). MYC, FOS, JUND, and FOSB were not expressed in our basal samples. FOSB was very highly upregulated in RL samples. Other genes activated during late cell cycle phases, such as cyclin D1 and genes involved in DNA replication and mitotic checkpoint control were not yet upregulated in our samples 2–3 hours after reperfusion.
In conclusion we have identified a huge amount of early human genes regulated in surgical phases of liver transplantation. Some of these genes are involved in liver injury and cell death, while other genes play a pivotal role in potential anti-inflammatory, regenerating, and protective mechanisms. The present study focused on the molecular mechanisms of liver injury. Obviously it is possible to hypothesize that there are other mechanisms that influence protein levels, despite gene expression behavior. The discovery of novel genes activated by IRI might lead to identification of potential target genes for the prevention or treatment of the liver injury. In that case we would consider it very helpful to extend the analysis to a proteomic level. The expression rate of the 50 most upregulated genes (Table 3) could potentially be used to check liver conditions according to specific therapeutic protocols.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Myriam Alcalay, Simone Minardi (FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Milan), and Pasquale De Luca (Genetic Engineering Center, Naples) for bioinformatic assistance.
REFERENCES
- 1, , . Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury—a fresh look. Exp Mol Pathol 2003; 74: 86–93.
- 2, . The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003; 9: 651–663.Direct Link:
- 3, , , . Superoxide generation by Kupffer cells and priming of neutrophils during reperfusion after hepatic ischemia. Free Radic Res Commun 1991; 15: 277–284.
- 4, . Neutrophil and Kupffer cell-induced oxidant stress and ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat liver. Am J Physiol 1991; 355–362.
- 5, , . O2-. release by activated Kupffer cells upon hypoxia-reoxygenation. Am J Physiol 1991; 261: 602–607.
- 6. Hypoxic, ischemic, and reperfusion injury to liver. In: AriasIM, BoyerJM, ChisaniFV, FaustoN, SchachterD, ShafritzDA, eds. The Liver: Biology and Pathobiology. 4th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Williams; 2001: 257–279.
- 7, , . Therapeutic approaches for ischemia/reperfusion injury in the liver. J Mol Med 1999; 77: 577–592. Review.
- 8. Reactive oxygen and mechanisms of inflammatory liver injury. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 15: 718–724. Review.Direct Link:
- 9. Molecular mechanisms of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and preconditioning. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2003; 284: 15–26. Review.
- 10, , , , , , et al. Gene expression profiling of acute liver stress during living donor liver transplantation. Am. J Transplant 2006; 6: 806–824.Direct Link:
- 11, , , , , , et al. Comparison of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions in cold preservation of liver from octogenarian donors. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 523–524.
- 12, , , , , , et al. The marginal donor: a single center experience in orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 1069–1073.
- 13
- 14
- 15, . Simultaneous gene clustering and subset selection for sample classification via MDL. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1100–1109.
- 16, , , , , , et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25: 25–29.
- 17
- 18, , , , , , . GO: TermFinder—open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 3710–33715.
- 19, , , . GOTree Machine (GOTM): a web-based platform for interpreting sets of interesting genes using Gene Ontology hierarchies. BMC Bioinformatics 2004; 5: 16.
- 20
- 21, , , , , , et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 2002; 18;3: 34.
- 22. , , , , , , . The PowerAtlas: a power and sample size atlas for microarray experimental design and research. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7: 84.
- 23, , , , , . Reperfusion-induced gene expression profiles in rat lung transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2160–2169.Direct Link:
- 24, , , , , , et al. The role of cytokine networks in the local liver injury following hepatic ischemia/reperfusion in the rat. Hepatology 1996; 23: 506–514.Direct Link:
- 25, , , , , et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes after partial rat liver ischemia/reperfusion by suppression subtractive hybridization. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 1303–1316.
- 26, , , , . Evaluation of warm ischemia-reperfusion injury using heat shock protein in the rat liver. Transpl Int 2003; 16: 88–99.Direct Link:
- 27, , , , , , et al. Effect of heat shock preconditioning on NF-kappaB/I-kappaB pathway during I/R injury of the rat liver. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2002; 282: 962–971.
- 28, . Heme oxygenase-1: redox regulation and role in the hepatic response to oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal 2002; 4: 749–758.
- 29, , , , , , et al. Protective effect of ischemic preconditioning on liver preservation-reperfusion injury in rats. Transplantation 1998; 66: 152–157.
- 30, , , . Neutrophil margination and extravasation in sinusoids and venules of liver during endotoxin-induced injury. Am J Physiol 1997; 272: 1195–1200.
- 31, , , . Identification of transcriptional networks during liver regeneration. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 3715–3722.

1527-6473/asset/LT_left.gif?v=1&s=e1df7d33719b841a3479d2fd0a24baa5df4653e4)
1527-6473/asset/LT_right.gif?v=1&s=5deda9b4c4c603398e58a7274cf47e5b03ffc5fe)
