Telephone: +34 942202738; FAX: +34 942315101
Original Article
ImmuKnow as a diagnostic tool for predicting infection and acute rejection in adult liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis†
Article first published online: 14 OCT 2012
DOI: 10.1002/lt.23497
Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Additional Information
How to Cite
Rodrigo, E., López-Hoyos, M., Corral, M., Fábrega, E., Fernández-Fresnedo, G., San Segundo, D., Piñera, C. and Arias, M. (2012), ImmuKnow as a diagnostic tool for predicting infection and acute rejection in adult liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Transpl, 18: 1244–1252. doi: 10.1002/lt.23497
- †
This work was supported by the Carlos III Institute of Health (REDINREN 06/16) and by the Institute for Training and Research of the Marqués de Valdecilla Foundation. Emilio Rodrigo was supported by grants from the Institute for Training and Research of the Marqués de Valdecilla Foundation and the Spanish Society of Nephrology.
- ‡
Telephone: +34 942202738; FAX: +34 942315101
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 14 OCT 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 27 JUN 2012 09:26AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 16 JUN 2012
- Manuscript Received: 18 APR 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Immune status monitoring of transplant recipients could identify patients at risk of acute rejection, infection, and cancer, which are important sources of morbidity and mortality in these patients. The ImmuKnow assay provides an objective assessment of the cellular immune function of immunosuppressed patients. Inconclusive results concerning the ability of the ImmuKnow test to predict acute rejection and infection have raised concerns about the predictive value of ImmuKnow in liver transplant recipients. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify studies published up to March 2012 that documented the use of ImmuKnow for monitoring immune function in liver transplant recipients. The study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 score. We identified 5 studies analyzing ImmuKnow performance for infection and 5 studies analyzing ImmuKnow performance for acute rejection. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 83.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 78.5%-88.3%], 75.3% (95% CI = 70.9%-79.4%), 3.3 (95% CI = 2.8-4.0), 14.6 (95% CI = 9.6-22.3), and 0.824 ± 0.034, respectively, for infection and 65.6% (95% CI = 55.0%-75.1%), 80.4% (95% CI = 76.4%-83.9%), 3.4 (95% CI = 2.4-4.7), 8.8 (95% CI = 3.1-24.8), and 0.835 ± 0.060, respectively, for acute rejection. Heterogeneity was low for infection studies and high for acute rejection studies. In conclusion, the ImmuKnow test is a valid tool for determining the risk of further infection in adult liver transplant recipients. Significant heterogeneity across studies precludes the conclusion that ImmuKnow identifies liver transplant patients at risk for rejection. Liver Transpl 18:1245–1253, 2012. © 2012 AASLD.

1527-6473/asset/LT_left.gif?v=1&s=e1df7d33719b841a3479d2fd0a24baa5df4653e4)
1527-6473/asset/LT_right.gif?v=1&s=5deda9b4c4c603398e58a7274cf47e5b03ffc5fe)
