Telephone: 734-615-4628; FAX: 734-936-7392
Article first published online: 7 DEC 2012
Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
Volume 18, Issue 12, pages 1479–1484, December 2012
How to Cite
Elmunzer, B. J., DeBenedet, A. T., Volk, M. L., Sonnenday, C. J., Waljee, A. K., Fontana, R. J., Oza, A. B., Singal, A., Englesbe, M. J. and Scheiman, J. M. (2012), Clinical yield of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in orthotopic liver transplant recipients With suspected biliary complications. Liver Transpl, 18: 1479–1484. doi: 10.1002/lt.23535
This study was supported by grant UL1RR024986 from the National Center for Research Resources.
The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.
- Issue published online: 7 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 7 DEC 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 10 AUG 2012 04:25AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 JUL 2012
- Manuscript Received: 13 MAR 2012
- National Center for Research Resources. Grant Number: UL1RR024986
Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (D-ERCP) is commonly performed for the evaluation of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This practice is contrary to the national trend of reserving endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for therapeutic purposes. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical yield and complications of D-ERCP in OLT recipients. In this retrospective study, 165 OLT recipients who underwent ERCP between January 2006 and December 2010 at the University of Michigan were divided into 2 groups: (1) a therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (T-ERCP) group (if they met prespecified criteria that suggested a high likelihood of endoscopic intervention) and (2) a D-ERCP group (if there was clinical suspicion of biliary disease but they did not meet any criteria). The 2 groups were compared with respect to the proportion of subjects undergoing high-yield ERCP, which was defined as a procedure resulting in a clinically important intervention that modified the disease course. 66.3% of the D-ERCP procedures were classified as high-yield, whereas 90.1% of the T-ERCP procedures were (P < 0.001). Serious complications were infrequent in both groups. A survey of practitioners caring for OLT recipients suggested that the rate of high-yield D-ERCP seen in this study is congruent with what is considered acceptable in clinical practice. In conclusion, although T-ERCP is more likely to reveal a pathological process requiring an intervention, D-ERCP appears to be an acceptable clinical strategy for OLT recipients because of the high likelihood of a high-yield study and the low rate of serious complications. Liver Transpl, 2012. © 2012 AASLD.