SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Aaker, J. L., & Sengupta, J. (2000). Additivity versus attenuation: The role of culture in resolution of information incongruity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 6782.
  • Adaval, R. (2001). Sometimes it just feels right: The differential weighting of affect-consistent and affect-inconsistent product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 117.
  • Andrews, J. C. (1988). Motivation, ability, and opportunity to process information: Conceptual and experimental manipulation issues. In M. J.Houston (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 15, pp. 219225). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
  • Aylesworth, A.B., & MacKenzie, S.B. (1998). Context is key: The effect of programinduced mood on thoughts about the ad. Journal of Advertising, 27, 1731.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 11731182.
  • Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D.M.Mackie & D.L.Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping (pp. 1238). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Beltramini, R.F. (1982). Advertising perceived believability scale. In D. R.Corrigan, F. B.Kraft, & R. H.Ross (Eds.), Proceedings of the Southwestern Marketing Association.Wichita, KS:Wichita State University, 13.
  • Blumer, J.G., & Katz, E. (Eds) (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratification research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Bohner, G., & Weinerth, T. (2001). Negative affect can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The affect interpretation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 14171428.
  • Bower, G. H., & Forgas, J. P. (2000). Affect, memory, and social cognition. In E.Eich, J. F.Kihlstrom, G. H.Bower, J. P.Forgas, & P. M.Niedenthal (Eds.), Cognition and emotion (pp. 87168). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Braun, K. A., Gaeth, G. J., & Levin, I. P. (1997). Framing effects with differential impact: The role of attribute salience. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 405411.
  • Brislin, R. W. (1987). The wording of translation of research instruments. In W. J.Lonner & J. W.Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Burke, M. C., & Edell, J. A. (1989). The impact of feelings on ad-based affect and cognition. Journal of Marketing, 26, 6983.
  • Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 210224.
  • Chang, C. (2005). The moderating influence of ad framing for ad-self-congruency effects. Psychology & Marketing, 22, 955968.
  • Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S.Wyer & T. K.Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 323–417). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 3747.
  • Edell, J. A., & Burke, M. C. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 421433.
  • Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 202216.
  • Eich, E. (1995). Searching for mood dependent memory. Psychological Science, 6, 6776.
    Direct Link:
  • Forgas, J. P. (1991). Emotion and social judgments. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Forgas, J. P. (1992). Affect in social judgments and decisions: A multiprocess model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 227275.
  • Forgas, J. P. (1994). The role of emotion in social judgments: An introductory review and an affect infusion model (AIM). European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 124.
  • Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 128.
  • Forgas, J. P. (2001). The Affect Infusion Model (AIM): An integrative theory of mood effects on cognition and judgments. In L. L.Martin & G. L.Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Forgas, J. P., & Bower, G.H. (1987). Mood effects on person-perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5360.
  • Forgas, J. P., Bower, G. H., & Krantz, S. E. (1984). The influence of mood on perceptions of social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 497513.
  • Forgas, J. P., Bower, G. H., & Moylan, S. J. (1990). Praise or blame? Affective influences on attributions for achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 809819.
  • Goldberg, M. E., & Gorn, G. J. (1987). Happy and sad TV programs: How they affect reactions to commercials. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 387403.
  • Gotlieb, J. B., & Sarel, D. (1991). Comparative advertising effectiveness: The role of involvement and source credibility. Journal of Advertising, 20, 3845.
  • Grewal, D., Kavanoor, S., Fern, E. F., Costley, C., & Barnes, J. (1997). Comparative versus noncomparative advertising: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 61, 115.
  • Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 404420.
  • Homer, P. M., & Yoon, S. (1992). Message framing and the interrelationships among ad-based feelings, affect, and cognition. Journal of Advertising, 21, 1933.
  • Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1983). Generalizing about messages: Suggestions for the design and analysis of experiments. Human Communication Research, 9, 169181.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 4, 362277.
  • Kolbe, R., & Burnett, M. (1991). Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 243250.
  • Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 4153.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819834.
  • Lee, A.Y., & Sternthal, B. (1999). The effects of positive mood on memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 115127.
  • Levin, I. P. (1987). Associative effects of information framing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 856.
  • Machleit, K. A., & Wilson, R. D. (1988). Emotional feelings and attitude toward the advertisement: The roles of brand familiarity and repetition. Journal of Advertising, 17, 2735.
  • MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 130143.
  • Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Cognitive deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 2740.
  • Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317326.
  • Mathur, M., & Chattopadhyay (1991). The impact of moods generated by television programs on responses to advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 8, 5977.
  • Mayer, J. D., Gaschke, Y. N., Braverman, D. L., & Evans, T. W. (1992). Moodcongruent judgment is a general effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 119132.
  • Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitudes? Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 318332.
  • Nabi, R. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference. Communication Research, 30, 224247.
  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 138148.
  • Petty, R. E., Gleicher, F., & Baker, S. (1991). Multiple roles for affect in persuasion. In J. P.Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgment (pp. 181200). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 144159.
  • Rossiter, J. R., Percy, L., & Donovan, R. J. (1991). A better advertising planning grid. Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 1121.
  • Salovey, P., Schneider, T. R., & Apanovitch, A. M. (2002). Message framing in the prevention and early detection of illness. In J. P.Dillard & M.Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook (pp. 391406). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information. Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In R.Sorrentino & E.T.Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 527561). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Schwarz, N., & Bless, B. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytical reasoning. In J.Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgment (pp. 5571). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Sedikides, C. (1995). Central and peripheral self-conceptions are differentially influenced by moods: Tests of the differential sensitivity hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 759777.
  • Smith, G. E. (1996). Framing in advertising and the moderating impact of consumer education. Journal of Advertising Research, 36, 4964.
  • Swinyard, W. R. (1981). The interaction between comparative advertising and copy claim variation. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 175186.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207232.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decision and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453458.
  • Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 10341048
  • Wegener, D.T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 515.
  • Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michel, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. 3rd ed. NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Wilder, D. A., & Simon, A. F. (1996). Incidental and integral affect as triggers of stereotyping. In R. M.Sorrentino & E.Tory Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 397419). London: Guilford.
  • Zhang, Y., & Buda, R. (1999). Moderating effects of need for cognition on responses to positively versus negatively framed advertising messages. Journal of Advertising, 28, 115.